H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC
Ivan Ljubicic vs Taylor Dent H2H: 2-2
Ivan Ljubicic and Taylor Dent are tied 2–2 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Taylor Dent leads 2–1 on hard courts, while Ivan Ljubicic leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Ivan Ljubicic won the 2010 Montpellier fourth round 7-5 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CRO
Age 47
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
2
–
2
4 main draw meetings
USA
Age 45
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 29, 2010* | Montpellier | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Ivan Ljubicic | 7-5 6-4 | Taylor Dent | Match data |
| Aug 25, 2009* | New Haven | ATP 250 | R64 | Hard | Taylor Dent | 6-3 6-4 | Ivan Ljubicic | Match data |
| Aug 10, 2005* | Canada Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Taylor Dent | 1-6 7-5 6-3 | Ivan Ljubicic | Match data |
| Jun 25, 2003* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Ivan Ljubicic | 7-5 3-6 6-3 7-5 | Taylor Dent | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ivan Ljubicic | #53 | #3 | 3,315 | 2,052 | 400 | 282 | 58.7% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 10 |
| Taylor Dent | #979 | #21 | 1,345 | 1,905 | 148 | 138 | 51.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Ivan Ljubicic | Taylor Dent | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1996 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #576 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #410 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1997 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #289 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #276 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1998 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #293 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #181 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1999 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #77 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 10–13 | 43.5% | #124 | 1,635 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2000 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #91 | 1,654 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 20–17 | 54.1% | #57 | 1,690 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2001 | 27–21 | 56.2% | #37 | 1,824 | 0 | 1 | 2003 | 28–12 | 70.0% | #33 | 1,883 | 0 | 4 |
| 23 | 2002 | 27–27 | 50.0% | #49 | 1,741 | 0 | 1 | 2004 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #32 | 1,744 | 0 | 4 |
| 24 | 2003 | 27–23 | 54.0% | #42 | 1,791 | 0 | 1 | 2005 | 33–21 | 61.1% | #29 | 1,783 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | 2004 | 33–22 | 60.0% | #22 | 1,809 | 0 | 1 | 2006 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #574 | 1,712 | 0 | 4 |
| 26 | 2005 | 50–23 | 68.5% | #9 | 1,951 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2006 | 55–19 | 74.3% | #5 | 1,944 | 0 | 6 | 2008 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #865 | 1,671 | 0 | 4 |
| 28 | 2007 | 43–22 | 66.2% | #18 | 1,807 | 0 | 8 | 2009 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #76 | 1,730 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | 2008 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #44 | 1,724 | 0 | 8 | 2010 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #118 | 1,776 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | 2009 | 32–23 | 58.2% | #24 | 1,894 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2010 | 26–19 | 57.8% | #17 | 1,884 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2011 | 25–19 | 56.8% | #30 | 1,909 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2012 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #53 | 1,794 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |