H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Ivan Ljubicic vs Tim Henman H2H: 4-1

Ivan Ljubicic holds a 4–1 lead over Tim Henman in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Ivan Ljubicic leads 4–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Ivan Ljubicic won the 2005 Dubai quarterfinal 7-5 6-4.

CRO Age 47 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
4 1
5 main draw meetings
GBR Age 51 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Feb 26, 2005* Dubai ATP 250 QF Hard Ivan Ljubicic #14 7-5 6-4 Tim Henman #7 Match data
Oct 23, 2004* Madrid Masters Masters 1000 R16 Hard Ivan Ljubicic #29 6-4 4-6 6-2 Tim Henman #5 Match data
Jan 10, 2004* Doha ATP 250 SF Hard Ivan Ljubicic #42 7-6(2) 3-6 7-6(5) Tim Henman #15 Match data
Feb 20, 2003* Rotterdam ATP 250 R32 Hard Ivan Ljubicic #52 6-4 6-2 Tim Henman #11 Match data
Feb 23, 2002* Rotterdam ATP 250 SF Hard Tim Henman #11 7-5 6-4 Ivan Ljubicic #33 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Ivan Ljubicic #53 #3 3,315 2,052 400 282 58.7% 0 1 0 0 9 10
Tim Henman #615 #4 2,826 2,027 468 260 64.3% 0 1 0 0 10 11

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Ivan Ljubicic Tim Henman
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1996 1–1 50.0% #576 1,509 0 0
18 1997 1–4 20.0% #289 1,489 0 0
19 1998 0–1 0.0% #293 1,482 0 0 1994 3–5 37.5% #167 1,513 0 0
20 1999 11–12 47.8% #77 1,587 0 0 1995 7–7 50.0% #95 1,584 0 0
21 2000 19–21 47.5% #91 1,654 0 0 1996 37–24 60.7% #29 1,821 0 0
22 2001 27–21 56.2% #37 1,824 0 1 1997 47–23 67.1% #17 1,895 0 2
23 2002 27–27 50.0% #49 1,741 0 1 1998 55–29 65.5% #7 1,960 0 4
24 2003 27–23 54.0% #42 1,791 0 1 1999 41–25 62.1% #12 1,785 0 4
25 2004 33–22 60.0% #22 1,809 0 1 2000 55–23 70.5% #10 1,953 0 6
26 2005 50–23 68.5% #9 1,951 0 3 2001 49–20 71.0% #9 1,924 0 8
27 2006 55–19 74.3% #5 1,944 0 6 2002 45–18 71.4% #8 1,867 0 9
28 2007 43–22 66.2% #18 1,807 0 8 2003 30–16 65.2% #15 1,970 0 11
29 2008 20–19 51.3% #44 1,724 0 8 2004 41–20 67.2% #6 1,926 0 11
30 2009 32–23 58.2% #24 1,894 0 9 2005 23–18 56.1% #36 1,746 0 11
31 2010 26–19 57.8% #17 1,884 0 10 2006 31–20 60.8% #39 1,868 0 11
32 2011 25–19 56.8% #30 1,909 0 10 2007 4–12 25.0% #292 1,684 0 11
33 2012 3–6 33.3% #53 1,794 0 10