H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Ivan Ljubicic vs Tomas Carbonell H2H: 1-0
Ivan Ljubicic holds a 1–0 lead over Tomas Carbonell in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Ivan Ljubicic leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Ivan Ljubicic won the 1996 Umag third round 6-3 RET.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CRO
Age 47
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 57
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 15, 1996* | Umag | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Ivan Ljubicic | 6-3 (ret.) | Tomas Carbonell | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ivan Ljubicic | #53 | #3 | 3,315 | 2,052 | 400 | 282 | 58.7% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 10 |
| Tomas Carbonell | #860 | #40 | 900 | 1,776 | 193 | 222 | 46.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Ivan Ljubicic | Tomas Carbonell | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1996 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #576 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #404 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1997 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #289 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #242 | 1,558 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1998 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #293 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #209 | 1,573 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1999 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #77 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #77 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2000 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #91 | 1,654 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 25–23 | 52.1% | #76 | 1,708 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2001 | 27–21 | 56.2% | #37 | 1,824 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 14–26 | 35.0% | #96 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2002 | 27–27 | 50.0% | #49 | 1,741 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 21–19 | 52.5% | #65 | 1,658 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2003 | 27–23 | 54.0% | #42 | 1,791 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 18–28 | 39.1% | #89 | 1,580 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2004 | 33–22 | 60.0% | #22 | 1,809 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 28–27 | 50.9% | #62 | 1,639 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2005 | 50–23 | 68.5% | #9 | 1,951 | 0 | 3 | 1995 | 26–26 | 50.0% | #74 | 1,677 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2006 | 55–19 | 74.3% | #5 | 1,944 | 0 | 6 | 1996 | 21–25 | 45.7% | #75 | 1,585 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2007 | 43–22 | 66.2% | #18 | 1,807 | 0 | 8 | 1997 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #170 | 1,576 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2008 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #44 | 1,724 | 0 | 8 | 1998 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #167 | 1,619 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 2009 | 32–23 | 58.2% | #24 | 1,894 | 0 | 9 | 1999 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #826 | 1,581 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | 2010 | 26–19 | 57.8% | #17 | 1,884 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2011 | 25–19 | 56.8% | #30 | 1,909 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2012 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #53 | 1,794 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |