H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Ivan Ljubicic vs Tommy Haas H2H: 2-2
Ivan Ljubicic and Tommy Haas are tied 2–2 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Tommy Haas leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Ivan Ljubicic won the 2005 Vienna fourth round 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CRO
Age 47
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
2
–
2
4 main draw meetings
GER
Age 48
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 14, 2005* | Vienna | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Ivan Ljubicic | 6-3 6-4 | Tommy Haas | Match data |
| Nov 1, 2001* | Paris Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Carpet | Tommy Haas | 6-3 6-4 | Ivan Ljubicic | Match data |
| Aug 2, 2001* | Canada Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Hard | Tommy Haas | 7-6(6) 6-4 | Ivan Ljubicic | Match data |
| Jun 15, 2000* | Halle | ATP 250 | R32 | Grass | Ivan Ljubicic | 6-2 5-7 6-2 | Tommy Haas | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ivan Ljubicic | #53 | #3 | 3,315 | 2,052 | 400 | 282 | 58.7% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 10 |
| Tommy Haas | #616 | #2 | 3,030 | 2,103 | 533 | 330 | 61.8% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 11 | 15 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Ivan Ljubicic | Tommy Haas | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1996 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #576 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1997 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #289 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #170 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1998 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #293 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 22–17 | 56.4% | #45 | 1,721 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1999 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #77 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 34–26 | 56.7% | #34 | 1,840 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2000 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #91 | 1,654 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 45–23 | 66.2% | #11 | 1,859 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2001 | 27–21 | 56.2% | #37 | 1,824 | 0 | 1 | 2000 | 27–20 | 57.4% | #23 | 1,777 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2002 | 27–27 | 50.0% | #49 | 1,741 | 0 | 1 | 2001 | 53–21 | 71.6% | #8 | 2,009 | 0 | 5 |
| 24 | 2003 | 27–23 | 54.0% | #42 | 1,791 | 0 | 1 | 2002 | 43–22 | 66.2% | #11 | 1,849 | 0 | 5 |
| 25 | 2004 | 33–22 | 60.0% | #22 | 1,809 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2005 | 50–23 | 68.5% | #9 | 1,951 | 0 | 3 | 2004 | 35–18 | 66.0% | #17 | 1,909 | 0 | 7 |
| 27 | 2006 | 55–19 | 74.3% | #5 | 1,944 | 0 | 6 | 2005 | 28–21 | 57.1% | #45 | 1,766 | 0 | 7 |
| 28 | 2007 | 43–22 | 66.2% | #18 | 1,807 | 0 | 8 | 2006 | 48–19 | 71.6% | #11 | 1,893 | 0 | 10 |
| 29 | 2008 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #44 | 1,724 | 0 | 8 | 2007 | 36–17 | 67.9% | #12 | 1,892 | 0 | 11 |
| 30 | 2009 | 32–23 | 58.2% | #24 | 1,894 | 0 | 9 | 2008 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #82 | 1,855 | 0 | 11 |
| 31 | 2010 | 26–19 | 57.8% | #17 | 1,884 | 0 | 10 | 2009 | 31–18 | 63.3% | #18 | 1,913 | 0 | 12 |
| 32 | 2011 | 25–19 | 56.8% | #30 | 1,909 | 0 | 10 | 2010 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #372 | 1,844 | 0 | 12 |
| 33 | 2012 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #53 | 1,794 | 0 | 10 | 2011 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #205 | 1,762 | 0 | 12 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 31–17 | 64.6% | #21 | 1,966 | 0 | 13 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 46–23 | 66.7% | #12 | 2,011 | 0 | 15 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 14–11 | 56.0% | #77 | 1,904 | 0 | 15 |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #470 | 1,784 | 0 | 15 |
| 39 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #252 | 1,686 | 0 | 15 |