H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC

Ivan Ljubicic vs Tommy Robredo H2H: 5-1

Ivan Ljubicic holds a 5–1 lead over Tommy Robredo in their ATP head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Ivan Ljubicic leads 3–1 on hard courts and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Ivan Ljubicic won the 2008 Indian Wells Masters third round 6-3 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Ivan Ljubicic
CRO Age 47 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
5 – 1
6 main draw meetings
Tommy Robredo
ESP Age 44 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Mar 18, 2008* Indian Wells Masters Masters 1000 R32 Hard Ivan Ljubicic #23 6-3 6-4 Tommy Robredo #15 Match data
Aug 20, 2006* Cincinnati Masters Masters 1000 QF Hard Tommy Robredo #7 7-6(6) 6-2 Ivan Ljubicic #3 Match data
Nov 6, 2005* Paris Masters Masters 1000 QF Carpet Ivan Ljubicic #10 7-6(6) 3-6 6-1 Tommy Robredo #21 Match data
Oct 15, 2005* Vienna ATP 250 SF Hard Ivan Ljubicic #13 7-6(5) 6-4 Tommy Robredo #18 Match data
Feb 26, 2005* Dubai ATP 250 SF Hard Ivan Ljubicic #14 6-4 6-3 Tommy Robredo #13 Match data
Apr 21, 2004* Monte Carlo Masters Masters 1000 R64 Clay Ivan Ljubicic #41 6-4 7-6(2) Tommy Robredo #22 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Ivan Ljubicic #53 #3 3,315 2,052 400 282 58.7% 0 1 0 0 9 10
Tommy Robredo #1,059 #5 2,770 2,048 523 351 59.8% 0 1 0 0 11 12

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Ivan Ljubicic Tommy Robredo
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1996 1–1 50.0% #576 1,509 0 0 1999 2–2 50.0% #244 1,534 0 0
18 1997 1–4 20.0% #289 1,489 0 0 2000 0–2 0.0% #131 1,496 0 0
19 1998 0–1 0.0% #293 1,482 0 0 2001 37–20 64.9% #30 1,761 0 1
20 1999 11–12 47.8% #77 1,587 0 0 2002 32–25 56.1% #30 1,794 0 1
21 2000 19–21 47.5% #91 1,654 0 0 2003 38–26 59.4% #21 1,761 0 1
22 2001 27–21 56.2% #37 1,824 0 1 2004 39–24 61.9% #13 1,823 0 2
23 2002 27–27 50.0% #49 1,741 0 1 2005 42–24 63.6% #19 1,849 0 2
24 2003 27–23 54.0% #42 1,791 0 1 2006 49–26 65.3% #7 1,868 0 4
25 2004 33–22 60.0% #22 1,809 0 1 2007 48–25 65.8% #10 1,856 0 6
26 2005 50–23 68.5% #9 1,951 0 3 2008 35–22 61.4% #21 1,882 0 7
27 2006 55–19 74.3% #5 1,944 0 6 2009 46–24 65.7% #16 1,903 0 9
28 2007 43–22 66.2% #18 1,807 0 8 2010 20–23 46.5% #50 1,796 0 9
29 2008 20–19 51.3% #44 1,724 0 8 2011 20–14 58.8% #51 1,760 0 10
30 2009 32–23 58.2% #24 1,894 0 9 2012 5–7 41.7% #114 1,752 0 10
31 2010 26–19 57.8% #17 1,884 0 10 2013 36–20 64.3% #18 2,000 0 12
32 2011 25–19 56.8% #30 1,909 0 10 2014 43–26 62.3% #17 1,998 0 12
33 2012 3–6 33.3% #53 1,794 0 10 2015 23–20 53.5% #42 1,883 0 12
34 — — — — — — — 2016 2–6 25.0% #358 1,814 0 12
35 — — — — — — — 2017 6–11 35.3% #164 1,740 0 12
36 — — — — — — — 2018 0–2 0.0% #201 1,684 0 12
37 — — — — — — — 2019 0–1 0.0% #205 1,582 0 12
40 — — — — — — — 2022 0–1 0.0% #1043 1,502 0 12