H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Ivan Ljubicic vs Yen-Hsun Lu H2H: 1-0
Ivan Ljubicic holds a 1–0 lead over Yen-Hsun Lu in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Ivan Ljubicic leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Ivan Ljubicic won the 2010 Roland Garros first round 7-6(5) 7-5 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CRO
Age 47
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
TPE
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 26, 2010* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Ivan Ljubicic | 7-6(5) 7-5 6-3 | Yen-Hsun Lu | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ivan Ljubicic | #53 | #3 | 3,315 | 2,052 | 400 | 282 | 58.7% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 10 |
| Yen-Hsun Lu | #991 | #33 | 1,244 | 1,855 | 143 | 222 | 39.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Ivan Ljubicic | Yen-Hsun Lu | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1996 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #576 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #87 | 1,459 | 0 | 0 |
| 1997 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #289 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #158 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 |
| 1998 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #293 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #89 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 1999 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #77 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #110 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 2000 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #91 | 1,654 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #64 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 |
| 2001 | 27–21 | 56.2% | #37 | 1,824 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 9–22 | 29.0% | #98 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 |
| 2002 | 27–27 | 50.0% | #49 | 1,741 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 15–20 | 42.9% | #35 | 1,704 | 0 | 0 |
| 2003 | 27–23 | 54.0% | #42 | 1,791 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #82 | 1,708 | 0 | 0 |
| 2004 | 33–22 | 60.0% | #22 | 1,809 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #59 | 1,751 | 0 | 0 |
| 2005 | 50–23 | 68.5% | #9 | 1,951 | 0 | 3 | 2013 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #65 | 1,763 | 0 | 0 |
| 2006 | 55–19 | 74.3% | #5 | 1,944 | 0 | 6 | 2014 | 24–22 | 52.2% | #38 | 1,798 | 0 | 0 |
| 2007 | 43–22 | 66.2% | #18 | 1,807 | 0 | 8 | 2015 | 16–22 | 42.1% | #77 | 1,818 | 0 | 0 |
| 2008 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #44 | 1,724 | 0 | 8 | 2016 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #64 | 1,810 | 0 | 0 |
| 2009 | 32–23 | 58.2% | #24 | 1,894 | 0 | 9 | 2017 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #71 | 1,704 | 0 | 0 |
| 2010 | 26–19 | 57.8% | #17 | 1,884 | 0 | 10 | 2020 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #1008 | 1,674 | 0 | 0 |
| 2011 | 25–19 | 56.8% | #30 | 1,909 | 0 | 10 | 2021 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #568 | 1,614 | 0 | 0 |
| 2012 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #53 | 1,794 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |