H2H data updated: 2026-09-05 00:00 UTC

Ivan Molina vs Byron Bertram H2H: 0-1

Byron Bertram holds a 1–0 lead over Ivan Molina in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Byron Bertram leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Byron Bertram won the 1974 Little Rock round of 16 6-7 7-6 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Ivan Molina
COL Age 80 Left-Handed
H2H
0 – 1
1 main draw meetings
Byron Bertram
RSA Age 73 Right-Handed

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Byron Bertram 6-7 7-6 6-2 Ivan Molina Match data Feb 8, 1974* R16 Little Rock ATP 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Ivan Molina #831 #46 0 1,799 156 195 44.4% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Byron Bertram #150 #57 0 1,815 115 139 45.3% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Ivan Molina Byron Bertram
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1969 0–3 0.0% — 1,467 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1970 11–11 50.0% — 1,540 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 1971 9–13 40.9% — 1,547 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 1972 2–2 50.0% — 1,536 0 0
20 — — — — — — — 1973 11–10 52.4% #152 1,617 0 0
21 — — — — — — — 1974 15–13 53.6% #156 1,655 0 0
22 1968 2–3 40.0% — 1,517 0 0 1975 5–8 38.5% #120 1,652 0 0
23 1969 5–5 50.0% — 1,577 0 0 1976 23–24 48.9% #57 1,737 0 0
24 1970 1–2 33.3% — 1,553 0 0 1977 21–27 43.8% #87 1,744 0 0
25 1971 2–3 40.0% — 1,526 0 0 1978 10–11 47.6% #92 1,668 0 0
26 1972 11–16 40.7% — 1,609 0 0 1979 1–2 33.3% #219 1,649 0 0
27 1973 18–19 48.6% #54 1,640 0 0 1980 7–15 31.8% #150 1,570 0 0
28 1974 22–33 40.0% #94 1,603 0 0 — — — — — — —
29 1975 32–33 49.2% #54 1,773 0 0 — — — — — — —
30 1976 22–24 47.8% #91 1,624 0 0 — — — — — — —
31 1977 14–19 42.4% #81 1,682 0 0 — — — — — — —
32 1978 16–19 45.7% #101 1,658 0 0 — — — — — — —
33 1979 11–15 42.3% #100 1,648 0 0 — — — — — — —
34 1980 0–4 0.0% #365 1,575 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Ivan Molina Byron Bertram
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1969 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1970 1 3 4 25.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 8 5 13 61.5% — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1971 4 5 9 44.4% 0 2 2 0.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 0 2 2 0.0%
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1972 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1973 3 3 6 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0%
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1974 3 1 4 75.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 10 7 17 58.8%
22 1968 — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — 1975 1 3 4 25.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
23 1969 0 1 1 0.0% 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — — — — — 1976 7 4 11 63.6% 13 15 28 46.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 4 7 42.9%
24 1970 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 1977 7 10 17 41.2% 4 7 11 36.4% 6 3 9 66.7% 4 7 11 36.4%
25 1971 — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — 1978 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 10 6 16 62.5%
26 1972 0 2 2 0.0% 8 10 18 44.4% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — 1979 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
27 1973 2 3 5 40.0% 14 12 26 53.8% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — 1980 4 6 10 40.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
28 1974 5 7 12 41.7% 10 14 24 41.7% 0 3 3 0.0% 7 9 16 43.8% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1975 1 6 7 14.3% 28 20 48 58.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1976 2 2 4 50.0% 20 19 39 51.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1977 — — — — 14 19 33 42.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1978 — — — — 16 19 35 45.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1979 1 3 4 25.0% 10 12 22 45.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1980 — — — — 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 11 25 36 30.6% 130 140 270 48.1% 5 14 19 26.3% 10 16 26 38.5% — 31 43 74 41.9% 24 41 65 36.9% 29 24 53 54.7% 31 31 62 50.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Ivan Molina Byron Bertram
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1969 1467 97.7 — — — — +26 — — 20.0% -2.20 — — — -0.10
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1970 1541 119.6 — — — — -55 -40 +104 49.1% -0.21 0–1 — — +0.86
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1971 1547 108.9 — — — — -39 — +97 47.5% -0.13 2–7 (22%) 3–2 (60%) 96.3 +2.12
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1972 1536 105.5 — — — — — — — 54.5% +1.27 — 0–1 — +0.31
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1973 1618 113.6 — — — — +1 -147 +39 49.0% -0.12 5–3 (63%) 2–2 (50%) 102.7 +1.62
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1974 1655 122.3 — — — — +78 -202 — 53.2% +0.08 5–3 (63%) 5–2 (71%) 106.5 +2.72
22 1968 1517 104.4 — — — — — +22 — 62.5% +1.00 1–1 — — +0.01 1975 1653 123.3 — — — — +13 -136 — 44.1% -0.26 2–3 (40%) 3–2 (60%) 99.5 -0.16
23 1969 1577 106.7 — — — — — +36 — 46.7% -0.27 4–1 (80%) — — +0.25 1976 1737 135.3 — — — — +19 -143 — 48.7% -0.04 10–8 (56%) 5–6 (45%) 102.8 -0.81
24 1970 1553 99.3 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.50 — — — +0.64 1977 1745 136.0 — — — — -14 -174 +50 43.4% -0.53 11–5 (69%) 4–7 (36%) 107.4 -2.84
25 1971 1526 102.0 — — — — — +40 — 46.7% +0.33 0–1 — — +0.93 1978 1668 116.8 — — — — +30 — — 45.7% -0.35 2–1 (67%) 3–1 (75%) 102.2 +3.30
26 1972 1609 120.2 — — — — — +26 -91 45.9% -0.12 1–5 (17%) 1–2 (33%) 95.0 -0.92 1979 1650 106.6 — — — — +23 — — 28.6% -0.86 1–0 0–1 — +0.39
27 1973 1641 125.1 — — — — -99 +57 -136 48.9% -0.08 4–4 (50%) 5–6 (45%) 99.9 +2.11 1980 1570 124.2 — — — — +66 -71 +169 38.9% -0.57 2–5 (29%) 5–6 (45%) 96.6 -0.40
28 1974 1603 122.3 — — — — -39 +70 -155 42.1% -0.44 8–11 (42%) 2–12 (14%) 90.9 +3.98 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1975 1773 145.2 — — — — -220 +66 — 48.4% +0.01 10–11 (48%) 3–8 (27%) 100.4 -2.34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1976 1625 125.0 — — — — -108 +67 — 47.7% -0.01 7–7 (50%) 6–8 (43%) 96.5 +3.96 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1977 1683 141.6 — — — — — +16 — 42.3% -0.49 6–5 (55%) 5–4 (56%) 103.6 -1.93 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1978 1659 132.2 — — — — — +5 — 48.7% -0.20 5–7 (42%) 5–2 (71%) 100.4 +0.02 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1979 1649 142.7 — — — — -134 +28 — 45.2% -0.13 2–4 (33%) 5–6 (45%) 97.4 -0.98 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1980 1575 106.5 — — — — — +17 — 22.2% -1.11 0–1 — — +0.26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1800 136.1 — — — — -105 +43 -120 46.0% -0.18 48–58 (45%) 32–48 (40%) 93.2 +1.73 — 1816 130.3 — — — — +20 -141 +86 46.2% -0.25 40–36 (53%) 30–30 (50%) 106.0 +2.79

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.