H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Ivo Heuberger vs Neville Godwin H2H: 1-0
Ivo Heuberger holds a 1–0 lead over Neville Godwin in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Ivo Heuberger leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Ivo Heuberger won the 2001 Shanghai third round 6-4 7-6(4).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SUI
Age 50
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
RSA
Age 51
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 20, 2001* | Shanghai | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Ivo Heuberger | 6-4 7-6(4) | Neville Godwin | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ivo Heuberger | #1,496 | #102 | 398 | 1,639 | 33 | 72 | 31.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Neville Godwin | #812 | #90 | 515 | 1,670 | 34 | 51 | 40.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Ivo Heuberger | Neville Godwin | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #487 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #275 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #208 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1997 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #188 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #111 | 1,594 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1998 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #143 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #180 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1999 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #221 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #150 | 1,581 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2000 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #222 | 1,448 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #210 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2001 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #112 | 1,598 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #123 | 1,616 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2002 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #127 | 1,609 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #128 | 1,579 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2003 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #155 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #207 | 1,489 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2004 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #124 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2005 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #214 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |