H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC

Ivo Karlovic vs Benjamin Becker H2H: 7-1

Ivo Karlovic holds a 7–1 lead over Benjamin Becker in their ATP head-to-head. Across 8 main-draw meetings, Ivo Karlovic leads 5–1 on hard courts and 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Ivo Karlovic won the 2014 Basel quarterfinal 6-4 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Ivo Karlovic
CRO Age 47 Right-Handed 211 cm / 6'11"
H2H
7 – 1
8 main draw meetings
Benjamin Becker
GER Age 45 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Oct 25, 2014* Basel ATP 500 QF Hard Ivo Karlovic #31 6-4 6-4 Benjamin Becker #45 Match data
Aug 12, 2014* Cincinnati Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Benjamin Becker #57 7-6(5) 6-4 Ivo Karlovic #28 Match data
Apr 7, 2011* Houston ATP 250 R32 Clay Ivo Karlovic #174 7-6(5) 6-4 Benjamin Becker #65 Match data
Feb 18, 2010* Memphis ATP 250 R32 Hard Ivo Karlovic #33 7-6(6) 7-6(4) Benjamin Becker #40 Match data
Jan 7, 2010* Doha ATP 250 R16 Hard Ivo Karlovic #37 4-6 6-3 6-2 Benjamin Becker #40 Match data
Oct 4, 2007* Tokyo ATP 500 R32 Hard Ivo Karlovic #28 6-4 6-3 Benjamin Becker #58 Match data
Apr 12, 2007* Houston ATP 250 R32 Clay Ivo Karlovic #108 7-5 7-6(3) Benjamin Becker #44 Match data
Feb 17, 2007* San Jose ATP 250 SF Hard Ivo Karlovic #103 7-6(5) 7-5 Benjamin Becker #49 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Ivo Karlovic #1,066 #14 2,295 1,998 357 333 51.7% 0 0 0 0 8 8
Benjamin Becker #1,074 #35 1,098 1,851 153 215 41.6% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Ivo Karlovic Benjamin Becker
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
22 2001 0–1 0.0% #193 1,500 0 0 — — — — — — —
23 2002 1–2 33.3% #201 1,454 0 0 — — — — — — —
24 2003 9–7 56.2% #73 1,666 0 0 — — — — — — —
25 2004 16–24 40.0% #61 1,667 0 0 2006 9–8 52.9% #58 1,725 0 0
26 2005 17–22 43.6% #70 1,739 0 0 2007 21–30 41.2% #84 1,586 0 0
27 2006 16–18 47.1% #98 1,632 0 0 2008 11–20 35.5% #129 1,642 0 0
28 2007 45–21 68.2% #22 1,940 0 3 2009 14–19 42.4% #40 1,643 0 1
29 2008 29–25 53.7% #26 1,815 0 4 2010 30–29 50.8% #53 1,811 0 1
30 2009 21–22 48.8% #37 1,795 0 4 2011 3–9 25.0% #304 1,724 0 1
31 2010 16–9 64.0% #73 1,864 0 4 2012 10–14 41.7% #65 1,725 0 1
32 2011 16–20 44.4% #56 1,819 0 4 2013 9–19 32.1% #79 1,767 0 1
33 2012 14–16 46.7% #100 1,768 0 4 2014 27–25 51.9% #40 1,835 0 1
34 2013 15–13 53.6% #78 1,772 0 5 2015 10–21 32.3% #97 1,732 0 1
35 2014 32–27 54.2% #27 1,853 0 5 2016 9–18 33.3% #119 1,734 0 1
36 2015 38–25 60.3% #23 1,916 0 6 2017 0–3 0.0% #519 1,591 0 1
37 2016 32–22 59.3% #20 1,970 0 8 — — — — — — —
38 2017 15–20 42.9% #80 1,770 0 8 — — — — — — —
39 2018 11–16 40.7% #100 1,644 0 8 — — — — — — —
40 2019 11–15 42.3% #95 1,668 0 8 — — — — — — —
41 2020 1–4 20.0% #147 1,615 0 8 — — — — — — —
42 2021 2–4 33.3% #279 1,623 0 8 — — — — — — —