H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 01:16 UTC

Ivo Karlovic vs Dmitry Tursunov H2H: 1-2

Dmitry Tursunov holds a 2–1 lead over Ivo Karlovic in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Dmitry Tursunov leads 1–0 on clay, while Ivo Karlovic leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Ivo Karlovic won the 2007 Nottingham semifinal 7-5 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Ivo Karlovic
CRO Age 47 Right-Handed 211 cm / 6'11"
H2H
1 – 2
3 main draw meetings
Dmitry Tursunov
RUS Age 43 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 23, 2007* Nottingham ATP 250 SF Grass Ivo Karlovic #61 7-5 6-4 Dmitry Tursunov #24 Match data
Apr 15, 2004* Houston ATP 250 R32 Clay Dmitry Tursunov #74 6-7(3) 6-4 7-5 Ivo Karlovic #65 Match data
Mar 4, 2004* Scottsdale ATP 250 R32 Hard Dmitry Tursunov #74 6-3 6-4 Ivo Karlovic #70 Match data
Jun 23, 2003 Wimbledon Grand Slam Q1 Q Grass Ivo Karlovic #203 7-6(5) 7-5 Dmitry Tursunov #214 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Ivo Karlovic #1,066 #14 2,295 1,998 357 333 51.7% 0 0 0 0 8 8
Dmitry Tursunov #815 #20 2,290 1,914 223 215 50.9% 0 0 0 0 7 7

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Ivo Karlovic Dmitry Tursunov
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 — — — — — — — 2001 3–1 75.0% #174 1,542 0 0
20 — — — — — — — 2003 2–3 40.0% #98 1,610 0 0
21 — — — — — — — 2004 12–17 41.4% #80 1,681 0 0
22 2001 0–1 0.0% #193 1,500 0 0 2005 16–16 50.0% #60 1,738 0 0
23 2002 1–2 33.3% #201 1,454 0 0 2006 42–31 57.5% #22 1,785 0 1
24 2003 9–7 56.2% #73 1,666 0 0 2007 28–21 57.1% #34 1,767 0 3
25 2004 16–24 40.0% #61 1,667 0 0 2008 35–21 62.5% #22 1,861 0 5
26 2005 17–22 43.6% #70 1,739 0 0 2009 13–17 43.3% #89 1,701 0 6
27 2006 16–18 47.1% #98 1,632 0 0 2010 6–9 40.0% #197 1,705 0 6
28 2007 45–21 68.2% #22 1,940 0 3 2011 18–18 50.0% #40 1,767 0 7
29 2008 29–25 53.7% #26 1,815 0 4 2012 3–9 25.0% #122 1,698 0 7
30 2009 21–22 48.8% #37 1,795 0 4 2013 30–21 58.8% #29 1,868 0 7
31 2010 16–9 64.0% #73 1,864 0 4 2014 13–19 40.6% #110 1,746 0 7
32 2011 16–20 44.4% #56 1,819 0 4 — — — — — — —
33 2012 14–16 46.7% #100 1,768 0 4 2016 1–7 12.5% #411 1,676 0 7
34 2013 15–13 53.6% #78 1,772 0 5 2017 1–5 16.7% #487 1,622 0 7
35 2014 32–27 54.2% #27 1,853 0 5 — — — — — — —
36 2015 38–25 60.3% #23 1,916 0 6 — — — — — — —
37 2016 32–22 59.3% #20 1,970 0 8 — — — — — — —
38 2017 15–20 42.9% #80 1,770 0 8 — — — — — — —
39 2018 11–16 40.7% #100 1,644 0 8 — — — — — — —
40 2019 11–15 42.3% #95 1,668 0 8 — — — — — — —
41 2020 1–4 20.0% #147 1,615 0 8 — — — — — — —
42 2021 2–4 33.3% #279 1,623 0 8 — — — — — — —