H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 19:16 UTC

Ivo Karlovic vs Fernando Verdasco H2H: 3-4

Fernando Verdasco holds a 4–3 lead over Ivo Karlovic in their ATP head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, Fernando Verdasco leads 3–1 on hard courts, while Ivo Karlovic leads 2–0 on grass. Most recently, Fernando Verdasco won the 2017 Doha quarterfinal 6-2 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Ivo Karlovic
CRO Age 47 Right-Handed 211 cm / 6'11"
H2H
3 – 4
7 main draw meetings
Fernando Verdasco
ESP Age 42 Left-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jan 6, 2017* Doha ATP 250 QF Hard Fernando Verdasco #42 6-2 7-5 Ivo Karlovic #20 Match data
Feb 11, 2011* San Jose ATP 250 R16 Hard Fernando Verdasco #9 7-5 7-5 Ivo Karlovic #122 Match data
May 12, 2010* Madrid Masters Masters 1000 R32 Clay Fernando Verdasco #9 7-6(5) 6-3 Ivo Karlovic #36 Match data
Jun 30, 2009* Wimbledon Grand Slam R16 Grass Ivo Karlovic #36 7-6(5) 6-7(4) 6-3 7-6(9) Fernando Verdasco #8 Match data
Jun 22, 2008* Nottingham ATP 250 F Grass Ivo Karlovic #22 7-5 6-7(4) 7-6(8) Fernando Verdasco #21 Match data
Oct 30, 2007* Paris Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Ivo Karlovic #24 4-6 6-3 6-4 Fernando Verdasco #27 Match data
Mar 8, 2006* Indian Wells Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Fernando Verdasco #34 6-3 3-6 7-6(5) Ivo Karlovic #59 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Ivo Karlovic #1,066 #14 2,295 1,998 357 333 51.7% 0 0 0 0 8 8
Fernando Verdasco #893 #7 3,900 2,125 549 441 55.5% 0 0 0 1 6 7

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Ivo Karlovic Fernando Verdasco
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 — — — — — — — 2002 1–2 33.3% #173 1,502 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 2003 7–12 36.8% #109 1,592 0 0
20 — — — — — — — 2004 31–25 55.4% #36 1,732 0 1
21 — — — — — — — 2005 34–27 55.7% #32 1,791 0 1
22 2001 0–1 0.0% #193 1,500 0 0 2006 31–25 55.4% #35 1,726 0 1
23 2002 1–2 33.3% #201 1,454 0 0 2007 33–26 55.9% #26 1,864 0 1
24 2003 9–7 56.2% #73 1,666 0 0 2008 45–27 62.5% #16 1,876 0 2
25 2004 16–24 40.0% #61 1,667 0 0 2009 51–24 68.0% #9 2,001 0 3
26 2005 17–22 43.6% #70 1,739 0 0 2010 43–21 67.2% #9 1,926 0 5
27 2006 16–18 47.1% #98 1,632 0 0 2011 34–24 58.6% #24 1,930 0 5
28 2007 45–21 68.2% #22 1,940 0 3 2012 32–21 60.4% #24 1,915 0 5
29 2008 29–25 53.7% #26 1,815 0 4 2013 27–24 52.9% #30 1,891 0 5
30 2009 21–22 48.8% #37 1,795 0 4 2014 26–20 56.5% #33 1,880 0 6
31 2010 16–9 64.0% #73 1,864 0 4 2015 24–26 48.0% #49 1,822 0 6
32 2011 16–20 44.4% #56 1,819 0 4 2016 29–26 52.7% #42 1,824 0 7
33 2012 14–16 46.7% #100 1,768 0 4 2017 29–25 53.7% #35 1,895 0 7
34 2013 15–13 53.6% #78 1,772 0 5 2018 33–28 54.1% #28 1,915 0 7
35 2014 32–27 54.2% #27 1,853 0 5 2019 26–27 49.1% #49 1,810 0 7
36 2015 38–25 60.3% #23 1,916 0 6 2020 6–7 46.2% #65 1,768 0 7
37 2016 32–22 59.3% #20 1,970 0 8 2021 2–8 20.0% #154 1,627 0 7
38 2017 15–20 42.9% #80 1,770 0 8 2022 5–11 31.2% #124 1,603 0 7
39 2018 11–16 40.7% #100 1,644 0 8 2023 0–5 0.0% #651 1,535 0 7
40 2019 11–15 42.3% #95 1,668 0 8 — — — — — — —
41 2020 1–4 20.0% #147 1,615 0 8 — — — — — — —
42 2021 2–4 33.3% #279 1,623 0 8 — — — — — — —