H2H data updated: 2026-09-07 00:00 UTC

Ivo Karlovic vs Guillermo Canas H2H: 0-1

Guillermo Canas holds a 1–0 lead over Ivo Karlovic in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Guillermo Canas leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Guillermo Canas won the 2002 Chennai round of 16 7-5 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Ivo Karlovic
CRO Age 47 Right-Handed 211 cm / 6'11"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Guillermo Canas
ARG Age 48 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Guillermo Canas #15 7-5 6-2 Ivo Karlovic #193 Match data Jan 4, 2002* R16 Chennai ATP International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Ivo Karlovic #1,066 #14 2,295 1,999 363 335 52.0% 0 0 0 0 8 8
Guillermo Canas #1,110 #8 2,075 1,991 245 189 56.5% 0 1 0 1 5 7

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Ivo Karlovic Guillermo Canas
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 — — — — — — — 1996 0–3 0.0% #183 1,461 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 1997 1–4 20.0% #129 1,460 0 0
20 — — — — — — — 1998 6–14 30.0% #95 1,480 0 0
21 — — — — — — — 1999 15–23 39.5% #71 1,575 0 0
22 2001 0–1 0.0% #193 1,500 0 0 2000 5–12 29.4% #231 1,530 0 0
23 2002 1–2 33.3% #201 1,454 0 0 2001 45–21 68.2% #15 1,839 0 1
24 2003 9–7 56.2% #73 1,665 0 0 2002 41–22 65.1% #15 1,856 0 3
25 2004 18–25 41.9% #61 1,685 0 0 2003 5–4 55.6% #272 1,804 0 3
26 2005 17–22 43.6% #70 1,745 0 0 2004 40–21 65.6% #12 1,900 0 6
27 2006 16–18 47.1% #98 1,633 0 0 2005 22–11 66.7% #102 1,870 0 6
28 2007 45–21 68.2% #22 1,931 0 3 — — — — — — —
29 2008 29–25 53.7% #26 1,814 0 4 2007 38–21 64.4% #15 1,817 0 7
30 2009 21–22 48.8% #37 1,797 0 4 2008 22–20 52.4% #79 1,684 0 7
31 2010 16–9 64.0% #73 1,866 0 4 2009 5–13 27.8% #191 1,626 0 7
32 2011 16–20 44.4% #56 1,821 0 4 — — — — — — —
33 2012 14–16 46.7% #100 1,769 0 4 — — — — — — —
34 2013 15–13 53.6% #78 1,774 0 5 — — — — — — —
35 2014 36–28 56.2% #27 1,856 0 5 — — — — — — —
36 2015 38–25 60.3% #23 1,917 0 6 — — — — — — —
37 2016 32–22 59.3% #20 1,972 0 8 — — — — — — —
38 2017 15–20 42.9% #80 1,771 0 8 — — — — — — —
39 2018 11–16 40.7% #100 1,645 0 8 — — — — — — —
40 2019 11–15 42.3% #95 1,675 0 8 — — — — — — —
41 2020 1–4 20.0% #147 1,620 0 8 — — — — — — —
42 2021 2–4 33.3% #279 1,625 0 8 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Ivo Karlovic Guillermo Canas
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 3 7 10 30.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 1 6 7 14.3% 12 11 23 52.2% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 4 4 0.0%
22 2001 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 1 3 4 25.0% 4 8 12 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
23 2002 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2001 19 10 29 65.5% 18 7 25 72.0% 7 2 9 77.8% 1 2 3 33.3%
24 2003 5 4 9 55.6% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 2002 16 8 24 66.7% 20 11 31 64.5% 4 2 6 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0%
25 2004 6 12 18 33.3% 5 7 12 41.7% 5 3 8 62.5% 2 3 5 40.0% 2003 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2005 9 11 20 45.0% 0 6 6 0.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2004 19 8 27 70.4% 17 10 27 63.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 3 1 4 75.0%
27 2006 8 11 19 42.1% 6 4 10 60.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 2005 7 3 10 70.0% 12 7 19 63.2% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — —
28 2007 30 16 46 65.2% 6 2 8 75.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2008 17 14 31 54.8% 5 8 13 38.5% 7 2 9 77.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 2007 15 10 25 60.0% 20 8 28 71.4% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
30 2009 9 15 24 37.5% 5 5 10 50.0% 7 2 9 77.8% — — — — 2008 9 9 18 50.0% 10 8 18 55.6% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
31 2010 14 7 21 66.7% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2009 1 7 8 12.5% 3 5 8 37.5% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
32 2011 12 13 25 48.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2012 12 11 23 52.2% 0 3 3 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2013 13 11 24 54.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2014 24 18 42 57.1% 7 6 13 53.8% 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2015 26 18 44 59.1% 1 3 4 25.0% 11 4 15 73.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2016 20 13 33 60.6% 4 6 10 40.0% 8 3 11 72.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2017 8 12 20 40.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
39 2018 4 7 11 36.4% 5 6 11 45.5% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
40 2019 9 11 20 45.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
41 2020 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
42 2021 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 229 213 442 51.8% 54 70 124 43.5% 74 44 118 62.7% 6 8 14 42.9% — 97 78 175 55.4% 117 82 199 58.8% 26 18 44 59.1% 5 11 16 31.2%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 692/698 of Ivo Karlovic's and 398/434 of Guillermo Canas's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Ivo Karlovic Guillermo Canas
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1996 1/3 1.0 4.0 47.6% 62.5% 54.5% 50.0% 50.0% 58.3% 40.7%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1997 5/5 5.2 2.8 50.9% 70.7% 47.1% 52.2% 43.1% 58.5% 38.0%
20 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1998 14/20 5.4 3.8 53.2% 72.2% 46.0% 62.4% 40.8% 59.7% 37.0%
21 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1999 31/38 2.8 3.1 57.2% 69.1% 52.5% 63.4% 42.8% 61.6% 41.1%
22 2001 1/1 16.0 2.0 76.6% 71.4% 46.7% 60.0% 50.0% 65.6% 32.4% 2000 15/17 3.8 4.3 53.3% 67.7% 44.7% 44.1% 44.4% 57.1% 38.5%
23 2002 2/3 15.0 8.5 53.7% 75.3% 40.4% 71.7% 75.0% 59.2% 28.6% 2001 57/66 5.8 2.7 60.7% 71.3% 51.9% 58.7% 44.3% 63.7% 42.8%
24 2003 16/16 17.6 6.3 61.1% 83.8% 53.3% 73.0% 28.3% 71.9% 29.0% 2002 58/63 5.2 2.6 59.7% 73.3% 54.6% 56.6% 43.3% 65.7% 41.4%
25 2004 40/43 21.1 5.4 61.9% 81.6% 52.8% 63.7% 25.9% 70.3% 26.8% 2003 9/9 4.9 4.6 62.9% 71.5% 46.3% 60.8% 35.2% 62.1% 39.9%
26 2005 39/39 18.7 4.4 63.3% 82.0% 51.5% 69.3% 31.9% 70.9% 25.5% 2004 61/61 4.8 3.4 58.7% 73.8% 54.8% 59.2% 48.3% 66.0% 41.5%
27 2006 34/34 18.3 3.1 65.0% 82.0% 50.3% 70.9% 34.6% 70.7% 28.1% 2005 32/33 3.5 2.4 60.6% 70.6% 53.3% 63.3% 47.0% 64.3% 43.3%
28 2007 64/66 20.6 1.9 68.7% 84.3% 54.5% 71.9% 34.1% 74.9% 29.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
29 2008 54/54 17.8 1.8 66.2% 81.4% 53.2% 66.2% 31.8% 71.8% 30.1% 2007 58/59 5.7 2.1 57.3% 73.5% 52.7% 60.3% 48.0% 64.7% 40.5%
30 2009 43/43 20.7 2.3 66.4% 84.9% 54.8% 62.5% 39.2% 74.8% 29.1% 2008 39/42 5.9 2.9 53.9% 71.1% 50.0% 54.1% 44.9% 61.4% 38.9%
31 2010 25/25 18.9 2.1 64.2% 83.5% 51.8% 68.0% 27.1% 72.1% 30.3% 2009 18/18 5.8 3.2 51.2% 73.2% 49.3% 62.8% 49.0% 62.0% 35.9%
32 2011 36/36 17.6 2.7 66.4% 80.8% 49.8% 65.5% 37.0% 70.5% 28.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2012 30/30 16.9 2.9 64.7% 79.5% 52.3% 61.0% 31.2% 69.7% 30.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2013 28/28 17.3 3.4 64.1% 82.1% 55.1% 61.7% 28.7% 72.4% 27.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2014 64/64 18.5 2.8 66.3% 82.8% 54.0% 68.7% 34.9% 73.2% 27.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
36 2015 63/63 23.0 3.6 66.4% 84.9% 57.0% 73.1% 33.3% 75.5% 29.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
37 2016 54/54 20.9 5.2 63.8% 81.7% 56.4% 72.1% 35.7% 72.6% 26.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
38 2017 35/35 20.8 5.1 65.1% 81.8% 56.2% 67.0% 29.2% 72.7% 25.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
39 2018 27/27 23.5 5.9 65.1% 83.9% 54.4% 71.8% 28.8% 73.4% 25.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
40 2019 26/26 23.7 4.3 65.0% 83.3% 54.3% 72.4% 24.8% 73.2% 25.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
41 2020 5/5 13.4 3.6 66.8% 75.6% 56.8% 71.8% 21.3% 69.5% 24.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
42 2021 6/6 18.2 5.2 64.8% 79.3% 46.0% 44.2% 29.2% 67.6% 27.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 692/698 19.8 3.5 65.3% 82.6% 53.8% 68.2% 32.4% 72.6% 28.1% — 398/434 5.0 2.9 57.7% 72.0% 52.0% 58.7% 45.3% 63.6% 40.8%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Ivo Karlovic Guillermo Canas
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 1462 97.5 +1.04 -2.26 0.976 49.1% — — — 25.0% -1.62 0–2 1–0 — +0.33
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 1461 111.0 +1.67 -1.40 0.916 47.7% +43 — — 33.3% -1.25 0–2 1–0 — -0.22
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 1481 121.3 -1.19 -0.67 0.917 48.3% +38 +4 +126 40.4% -0.50 1–6 (14%) 3–6 (33%) 94.8 +0.36
21 2000 1493 98.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 1575 128.1 +0.38 +2.60 1.070 51.2% -99 +35 +40 42.7% -0.46 3–7 (30%) 8–7 (53%) 101.0 -1.21
22 2001 1501 100.2 -4.08 -1.53 0.943 47.8% — — — 0.0% -2.00 — 0–1 — +0.14 2000 1530 126.2 -2.48 +0.32 0.898 47.3% -56 +30 — 34.1% -0.98 2–4 (33%) 0–2 — -0.39
23 2002 1455 101.0 -0.82 -1.26 0.701 45.7% — — — 42.9% -0.57 0–1 1–1 — -0.01 2001 1839 149.5 +2.44 +4.53 1.177 52.9% -76 -16 -135 60.0% +0.79 15–5 (75%) 9–13 (41%) 109.3 +0.72
24 2003 1666 123.8 +5.40 -4.66 1.033 50.5% -35 — +2 54.3% +0.22 2–2 (50%) 9–10 (47%) 100.2 -0.07 2002 1856 149.5 +2.94 +3.27 1.208 53.1% -23 +31 -142 60.5% +0.74 11–10 (52%) 13–11 (54%) 98.1 +1.54
25 2004 1686 136.3 +5.37 -7.05 0.904 48.9% -54 -121 +84 45.1% -0.31 10–14 (42%) 28–28 (50%) 102.1 -0.85 2003 1804 118.1 -0.44 +1.57 1.054 50.7% -9 — — 52.2% +0.09 2–0 3–2 (60%) — +0.24
26 2005 1745 141.3 +6.26 -7.68 0.875 48.7% -20 -269 +91 45.4% -0.26 6–7 (46%) 24–22 (52%) 102.5 -2.07 2004 1901 152.0 +3.45 +3.93 1.218 53.4% +11 +13 -212 61.9% +0.86 10–11 (48%) 11–9 (55%) 98.4 -1.25
27 2006 1633 131.3 +6.13 -7.11 0.960 49.6% +16 -48 — 51.1% +0.03 7–9 (44%) 19–18 (51%) 97.8 +0.32 2005 1871 147.8 +2.24 +5.12 1.212 53.3% +67 +11 -120 64.1% +1.00 2–5 (29%) 7–4 (64%) 97.1 +0.92
28 2007 1931 150.5 +9.95 -5.32 1.173 51.8% -6 -289 -103 60.5% +0.53 17–8 (68%) 37–30 (55%) 109.8 -1.29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2008 1815 150.1 +7.57 -4.88 1.069 50.7% +25 -181 +93 53.4% +0.24 7–10 (41%) 26–29 (47%) 93.8 +0.70 2007 1818 155.4 +2.37 +3.32 1.149 52.4% +52 +124 -35 64.0% +0.84 5–7 (42%) 18–6 (75%) 103.0 -1.01
30 2009 1798 147.0 +8.98 -4.91 1.158 51.5% -104 -119 +253 51.8% +0.26 4–9 (31%) 14–24 (37%) 89.5 0.00 2008 1685 140.5 -1.38 +1.60 1.006 50.1% +67 +164 +92 48.0% 0.00 8–5 (62%) 5–12 (29%) 94.1 +1.08
31 2010 1867 147.8 +6.46 -3.55 1.087 51.1% -26 -171 — 56.7% +0.33 4–0 (100%) 11–9 (55%) 107.1 -0.09 2009 1627 123.4 -1.48 -0.18 0.946 49.5% +28 +135 — 37.5% -0.44 1–5 (17%) 2–6 (25%) 89.2 +0.68
32 2011 1822 147.5 +6.44 -5.95 0.962 49.6% +14 -88 +122 46.5% -0.14 5–5 (50%) 19–19 (50%) 98.0 -1.25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2012 1769 144.3 +5.38 -4.85 1.007 49.8% +37 -113 +182 48.7% -0.18 2–6 (25%) 17–14 (55%) 95.3 -0.59 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2013 1774 137.0 +5.97 -5.23 1.007 50.0% +27 — +167 51.6% +0.06 6–4 (60%) 17–11 (61%) 106.8 +0.66 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2014 1857 153.7 +7.97 -6.74 1.029 49.9% +21 -115 +54 55.0% +0.13 11–8 (58%) 34–31 (52%) 102.5 +1.55 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2015 1917 155.1 +10.01 -5.54 1.186 51.7% -35 -231 +136 57.1% +0.52 15–12 (56%) 32–44 (42%) 99.7 +3.02 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2016 1973 155.0 +7.27 -7.09 0.983 50.0% -18 -250 +83 56.8% +0.16 12–6 (67%) 41–25 (62%) 110.4 +3.08 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2017 1771 141.4 +6.85 -7.48 0.952 49.6% +15 -53 +153 44.9% -0.17 6–5 (55%) 17–24 (41%) 95.8 +1.27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
39 2018 1646 126.4 +5.95 -7.94 0.974 49.6% +41 +26 +201 46.2% -0.10 5–9 (36%) 17–24 (41%) 89.6 +0.79 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
40 2019 1675 134.3 +6.12 -7.61 0.954 49.4% +46 -25 +100 49.3% -0.17 2–6 (25%) 20–18 (53%) 99.5 +1.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
41 2020 1621 114.5 +1.55 -3.38 0.808 46.4% +33 — — 28.6% -1.00 — 1–4 (20%) — -0.32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
42 2021 1626 114.4 +1.80 -4.17 0.837 47.4% +19 — — 31.3% -0.75 2–1 (67%) 0–3 (0%) 98.7 +0.12 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2000 150.3 +7.24 -6.06 1.023 50.2% -4 -133 +101 51.7% +0.09 123–122 (50%) 384–389 (50%) 100.0 +0.88 — 1992 149.7 +1.54 +2.98 1.119 51.9% 0 +50 -51 54.9% +0.39 60–69 (47%) 81–78 (51%) 97.0 +0.42

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.