H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC

Ivo Karlovic vs Guillermo Garcia-Lopez H2H: 2-2

Ivo Karlovic and Guillermo Garcia-Lopez are tied 2–2 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Ivo Karlovic leads 2–1 on hard courts, while Guillermo Garcia-Lopez leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Ivo Karlovic won the 2015 Beijing third round 7-5 7-6(1).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Ivo Karlovic
CRO Age 47 Right-Handed 211 cm / 6'11"
H2H
2 – 2
4 main draw meetings
Guillermo Garcia-Lopez
ESP Age 43 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Oct 8, 2015* Beijing ATP 500 R32 Hard Ivo Karlovic #18 7-5 7-6(1) Guillermo Garcia-Lopez #26 Match data
May 13, 2012 Rome Masters Masters 1000 Q2 Q Clay Guillermo Garcia-Lopez #94 6-4 6-4 Ivo Karlovic #60 Match data
Mar 21, 2007* Miami Masters Masters 1000 R128 Hard Guillermo Garcia-Lopez #66 6-4 6-7(4) 7-6(5) Ivo Karlovic #105 Match data
Feb 15, 2007* San Jose ATP 250 R32 Hard Ivo Karlovic #103 6-3 7-6(7) Guillermo Garcia-Lopez #70 Match data
Apr 28, 2005* Estoril ATP 250 R32 Clay Guillermo Garcia-Lopez #80 6-3 6-3 Ivo Karlovic #64 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Ivo Karlovic #1,066 #14 2,295 1,998 357 333 51.7% 0 0 0 0 8 8
Guillermo Garcia-Lopez #1,009 #23 1,465 1,938 299 353 45.9% 0 0 0 0 5 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Ivo Karlovic Guillermo Garcia-Lopez
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
20 — — — — — — — 2003 0–1 0.0% #244 1,497 0 0
21 — — — — — — — 2004 5–7 41.7% #129 1,578 0 0
22 2001 0–1 0.0% #193 1,500 0 0 2005 19–26 42.2% #91 1,589 0 0
23 2002 1–2 33.3% #201 1,454 0 0 2006 15–20 42.9% #68 1,595 0 0
24 2003 9–7 56.2% #73 1,666 0 0 2007 13–22 37.1% #90 1,526 0 0
25 2004 16–24 40.0% #61 1,667 0 0 2008 22–22 50.0% #62 1,646 0 0
26 2005 17–22 43.6% #70 1,739 0 0 2009 28–27 50.9% #41 1,757 0 1
27 2006 16–18 47.1% #98 1,632 0 0 2010 31–23 57.4% #33 1,874 0 2
28 2007 45–21 68.2% #22 1,940 0 3 2011 20–29 40.8% #65 1,712 0 2
29 2008 29–25 53.7% #26 1,815 0 4 2012 20–25 44.4% #76 1,719 0 2
30 2009 21–22 48.8% #37 1,795 0 4 2013 20–21 48.8% #62 1,774 0 2
31 2010 16–9 64.0% #73 1,864 0 4 2014 25–26 49.0% #36 1,740 0 3
32 2011 16–20 44.4% #56 1,819 0 4 2015 32–25 56.1% #27 1,853 0 5
33 2012 14–16 46.7% #100 1,768 0 4 2016 22–31 41.5% #70 1,686 0 5
34 2013 15–13 53.6% #78 1,772 0 5 2017 5–15 25.0% #70 1,747 0 5
35 2014 32–27 54.2% #27 1,853 0 5 2018 16–23 41.0% #105 1,675 0 5
36 2015 38–25 60.3% #23 1,916 0 6 2019 6–10 37.5% #144 1,694 0 5
37 2016 32–22 59.3% #20 1,970 0 8 — — — — — — —
38 2017 15–20 42.9% #80 1,770 0 8 — — — — — — —
39 2018 11–16 40.7% #100 1,644 0 8 — — — — — — —
40 2019 11–15 42.3% #95 1,668 0 8 — — — — — — —
41 2020 1–4 20.0% #147 1,615 0 8 — — — — — — —
42 2021 2–4 33.3% #279 1,623 0 8 — — — — — — —