H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Ivo Karlovic vs Lukasz Kubot H2H: 1-3
Lukasz Kubot holds a 3–1 lead over Ivo Karlovic in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Lukasz Kubot leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Ivo Karlovic won the 2012 Miami Masters first round 6-3 6-7(2) 7-6(2).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CRO
Age 47
Right-Handed
211 cm / 6'11"
H2H
1
–
3
4 main draw meetings
POL
Right-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 23, 2012* | Miami Masters | Masters 1000 | R128 | Hard | Ivo Karlovic | 6-3 6-7(2) 7-6(2) | Lukasz Kubot | Match data |
| Mar 10, 2012* | Indian Wells Masters | Masters 1000 | R128 | Hard | Lukasz Kubot | 6-4 6-2 | Ivo Karlovic | Match data |
| Jun 23, 2011* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R64 | Grass | Lukasz Kubot | 7-6(2) 6-3 6-3 | Ivo Karlovic | Match data |
| May 9, 2009* | Belgrade | ATP 250 | SF | Clay | Lukasz Kubot | 7-6(0) 6-2 | Ivo Karlovic | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ivo Karlovic | #1,066 | #14 | 2,295 | 1,998 | 357 | 333 | 51.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 8 |
| Lukasz Kubot | #1,054 | #41 | 977 | 1,870 | 82 | 118 | 41.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Ivo Karlovic | Lukasz Kubot | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2001 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #193 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #219 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 |
| 2002 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #201 | 1,454 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #142 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 2003 | 9–7 | 56.2% | #73 | 1,666 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #125 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 |
| 2004 | 16–24 | 40.0% | #61 | 1,667 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #222 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 2005 | 17–22 | 43.6% | #70 | 1,739 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 9–9 | 50.0% | #101 | 1,730 | 0 | 0 |
| 2006 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #98 | 1,632 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 15–24 | 38.5% | #70 | 1,661 | 0 | 0 |
| 2007 | 45–21 | 68.2% | #22 | 1,940 | 0 | 3 | 2011 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #57 | 1,818 | 0 | 0 |
| 2008 | 29–25 | 53.7% | #26 | 1,815 | 0 | 4 | 2012 | 21–26 | 44.7% | #74 | 1,721 | 0 | 0 |
| 2009 | 21–22 | 48.8% | #37 | 1,795 | 0 | 4 | 2013 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #72 | 1,674 | 0 | 0 |
| 2010 | 16–9 | 64.0% | #73 | 1,864 | 0 | 4 | 2014 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #170 | 1,673 | 0 | 0 |
| 2011 | 16–20 | 44.4% | #56 | 1,819 | 0 | 4 | 2015 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #471 | 1,700 | 0 | 0 |
| 2012 | 14–16 | 46.7% | #100 | 1,768 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2013 | 15–13 | 53.6% | #78 | 1,772 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2014 | 32–27 | 54.2% | #27 | 1,853 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2015 | 38–25 | 60.3% | #23 | 1,916 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2016 | 32–22 | 59.3% | #20 | 1,970 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2017 | 15–20 | 42.9% | #80 | 1,770 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2018 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #100 | 1,644 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2019 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #95 | 1,668 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2020 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #147 | 1,615 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #279 | 1,623 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |