H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Ivo Karlovic vs Marcos Baghdatis H2H: 2-3

Marcos Baghdatis holds a 3–2 lead over Ivo Karlovic in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Marcos Baghdatis leads 2–1 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Ivo Karlovic won the 2016 Newport semifinal 7-6(3) 7-6(6).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Ivo Karlovic
CRO Age 47 Right-Handed 211 cm / 6'11"
H2H
2 – 3
5 main draw meetings
Marcos Baghdatis
CYP Age 41 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jul 16, 2016* Newport ATP 250 SF Grass Ivo Karlovic #38 7-6(3) 7-6(6) Marcos Baghdatis #43 Match data
May 26, 2015* Roland Garros Grand Slam R128 Clay Marcos Baghdatis #59 7-6(5) 6-4 6-4 Ivo Karlovic #25 Match data
Feb 6, 2015* Zagreb ATP 250 R16 Hard Marcos Baghdatis #67 3-6 7-6(5) 7-6(7) Ivo Karlovic #25 Match data
Oct 2, 2008* Metz ATP 250 R32 Hard Ivo Karlovic #14 4-6 2-1 (ret.) Marcos Baghdatis #42 Match data
Feb 15, 2008* Marseille ATP 250 R16 Hard Marcos Baghdatis #17 6-4 6-4 Ivo Karlovic #23 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Ivo Karlovic #1,066 #14 2,295 1,998 357 333 51.7% 0 0 0 0 8 8
Marcos Baghdatis #179 #8 2,111 1,952 324 272 54.4% 0 0 0 0 4 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Ivo Karlovic Marcos Baghdatis
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 — — — — — — — 2004 1–1 50.0% #159 1,559 0 0
20 — — — — — — — 2005 11–12 47.8% #55 1,694 0 0
21 — — — — — — — 2006 33–20 62.3% #12 1,842 0 1
22 2001 0–1 0.0% #193 1,500 0 0 2007 44–22 66.7% #16 1,937 0 2
23 2002 1–2 33.3% #201 1,454 0 0 2008 12–12 50.0% #98 1,815 0 2
24 2003 9–7 56.2% #73 1,666 0 0 2009 18–16 52.9% #42 1,810 0 3
25 2004 16–24 40.0% #61 1,667 0 0 2010 41–27 60.3% #20 1,852 0 4
26 2005 17–22 43.6% #70 1,739 0 0 2011 26–27 49.1% #44 1,844 0 4
27 2006 16–18 47.1% #98 1,632 0 0 2012 31–24 56.4% #36 1,897 0 4
28 2007 45–21 68.2% #22 1,940 0 3 2013 14–22 38.9% #87 1,804 0 4
29 2008 29–25 53.7% #26 1,815 0 4 2014 7–11 38.9% #85 1,703 0 4
30 2009 21–22 48.8% #37 1,795 0 4 2015 26–19 57.8% #46 1,869 0 4
31 2010 16–9 64.0% #73 1,864 0 4 2016 26–23 53.1% #36 1,884 0 4
32 2011 16–20 44.4% #56 1,819 0 4 2017 18–16 52.9% #102 1,839 0 4
33 2012 14–16 46.7% #100 1,768 0 4 2018 12–17 41.4% #124 1,723 0 4
34 2013 15–13 53.6% #78 1,772 0 5 2019 4–3 57.1% #179 1,740 0 4
35 2014 32–27 54.2% #27 1,853 0 5 — — — — — — —
36 2015 38–25 60.3% #23 1,916 0 6 — — — — — — —
37 2016 32–22 59.3% #20 1,970 0 8 — — — — — — —
38 2017 15–20 42.9% #80 1,770 0 8 — — — — — — —
39 2018 11–16 40.7% #100 1,644 0 8 — — — — — — —
40 2019 11–15 42.3% #95 1,668 0 8 — — — — — — —
41 2020 1–4 20.0% #147 1,615 0 8 — — — — — — —
42 2021 2–4 33.3% #279 1,623 0 8 — — — — — — —