H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC

Ivo Karlovic vs Radek Stepanek H2H: 3-3

Ivo Karlovic and Radek Stepanek are tied 3–3 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Ivo Karlovic leads 3–0 on hard courts, while Radek Stepanek leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Ivo Karlovic won the 2015 Bogota quarterfinal 3-6 7-6(7) 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Ivo Karlovic
CRO Age 47 Right-Handed 211 cm / 6'11"
H2H
3 – 3
6 main draw meetings
Radek Stepanek
CZE Age 47 Right-Handed 186 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jul 25, 2015* Bogota ATP 250 QF Hard Ivo Karlovic #23 3-6 7-6(7) 6-4 Radek Stepanek #369 Match data
Jul 19, 2014* Bogota ATP 250 SF Hard Ivo Karlovic #29 6-4 3-6 6-4 Radek Stepanek #39 Match data
Apr 15, 2014* Monte Carlo Masters Masters 1000 R64 Clay Radek Stepanek #41 6-1 6-2 Ivo Karlovic #53 Match data
Jan 20, 2010* Australian Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Ivo Karlovic #39 2-6 7-6(5) 6-4 3-6 6-4 Radek Stepanek #13 Match data
Feb 4, 2005* Milan ATP 250 R16 Carpet Radek Stepanek #30 7-6(7) 4-6 7-6(5) Ivo Karlovic #60 Match data
Jul 16, 2004* Stuttgart ATP 250 R16 Clay Radek Stepanek #76 6-2 7-5 Ivo Karlovic #59 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Ivo Karlovic #1,066 #14 2,295 1,998 357 333 51.7% 0 0 0 0 8 8
Radek Stepanek #492 #8 2,700 2,034 366 283 56.4% 0 0 0 1 4 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Ivo Karlovic Radek Stepanek
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 — — — — — — — 1998 0–1 0.0% #165 1,488 0 0
20 — — — — — — — 1999 2–4 33.3% #169 1,501 0 0
22 2001 0–1 0.0% #193 1,500 0 0 2001 0–1 0.0% #542 1,464 0 0
23 2002 1–2 33.3% #201 1,454 0 0 2002 17–14 54.8% #63 1,659 0 0
24 2003 9–7 56.2% #73 1,666 0 0 2003 24–22 52.2% #46 1,716 0 0
25 2004 16–24 40.0% #61 1,667 0 0 2004 28–23 54.9% #33 1,790 0 0
26 2005 17–22 43.6% #70 1,739 0 0 2005 45–26 63.4% #20 1,840 0 0
27 2006 16–18 47.1% #98 1,632 0 0 2006 30–15 66.7% #19 1,865 0 1
28 2007 45–21 68.2% #22 1,940 0 3 2007 27–21 56.2% #30 1,863 0 2
29 2008 29–25 53.7% #26 1,815 0 4 2008 31–23 57.4% #27 1,837 0 2
30 2009 21–22 48.8% #37 1,795 0 4 2009 44–19 69.8% #12 2,010 0 4
31 2010 16–9 64.0% #73 1,864 0 4 2010 17–15 53.1% #62 1,872 0 4
32 2011 16–20 44.4% #56 1,819 0 4 2011 30–24 55.6% #28 1,880 0 5
33 2012 14–16 46.7% #100 1,768 0 4 2012 21–19 52.5% #31 1,930 0 5
34 2013 15–13 53.6% #78 1,772 0 5 2013 14–16 46.7% #44 1,828 0 5
35 2014 32–27 54.2% #27 1,853 0 5 2014 16–17 48.5% #68 1,801 0 5
36 2015 38–25 60.3% #23 1,916 0 6 2015 7–10 41.2% #197 1,766 0 5
37 2016 32–22 59.3% #20 1,970 0 8 2016 10–11 47.6% #107 1,866 0 5
38 2017 15–20 42.9% #80 1,770 0 8 2017 3–2 60.0% #354 1,900 0 5
39 2018 11–16 40.7% #100 1,644 0 8 — — — — — — —
40 2019 11–15 42.3% #95 1,668 0 8 — — — — — — —
41 2020 1–4 20.0% #147 1,615 0 8 — — — — — — —
42 2021 2–4 33.3% #279 1,623 0 8 — — — — — — —