H2H data updated: 2026-07-14 14:15 UTC
J. Canter vs G. Layendecker H2H: 0-1
G. Layendecker holds a 1–0 lead over J. Canter in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, G. Layendecker leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, G. Layendecker won the 1986 Scottsdale fourth round 7-6 4-6 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 61
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 65
Left-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 10, 1986* | Scottsdale | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | G. Layendecker | 7-6 4-6 6-3 | J. Canter | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| J. Canter | #810 | #36 | 244 | 1,792 | 68 | 96 | 41.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| G. Layendecker | #804 | #48 | 447 | 1,733 | 77 | 104 | 42.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | J. Canter | G. Layendecker | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1982 | 3–5 | 37.5% | — | 1,505 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1983 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #279 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1984 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #225 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1985 | 16–14 | 53.3% | #73 | 1,636 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1986 | 27–22 | 55.1% | #41 | 1,731 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1987 | 5–17 | 22.7% | #169 | 1,600 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1988 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #182 | 1,582 | 0 | 1 | 1984 | 3–12 | 20.0% | #174 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1989 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #183 | 1,532 | 0 | 1 | 1985 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #118 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1990 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #191 | 1,558 | 0 | 1 | 1986 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #73 | 1,663 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1991 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #408 | 1,539 | 0 | 1 | 1987 | 1–12 | 7.7% | #353 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 9–8 | 52.9% | #78 | 1,610 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1993 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #190 | 1,579 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #87 | 1,651 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1994 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #388 | 1,542 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 12–14 | 46.2% | #134 | 1,629 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #135 | 1,610 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #353 | 1,598 | 0 | 0 |