H2H data updated: 2026-07-14 14:15 UTC
J. Canter vs K. Evernden H2H: 0-4
K. Evernden holds a 4–0 lead over J. Canter in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, K. Evernden leads 3–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, K. Evernden won the 1990 Singapore third round 6-4 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 61
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
0
–
4
4 main draw meetings
NZL
Age 64
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 3, 1990* | Singapore | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | K. Evernden | 6-4 6-3 | J. Canter | Match data |
| Apr 14, 1989* | Seoul | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | K. Evernden | 6-3 6-2 | J. Canter | Match data |
| Oct 29, 1987* | Hong Kong | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | K. Evernden | 6-3 4-6 6-1 | J. Canter | Match data |
| Jan 14, 1987* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | K. Evernden | 7-6 6-3 6-4 | J. Canter | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| J. Canter | #810 | #36 | 244 | 1,792 | 68 | 96 | 41.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| K. Evernden | #1,218 | #31 | 535 | 1,853 | 121 | 129 | 48.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | J. Canter | K. Evernden | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1982 | 3–5 | 37.5% | — | 1,505 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1983 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #279 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #403 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1984 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #225 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1985 | 16–14 | 53.3% | #73 | 1,636 | 0 | 1 | 1982 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,506 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1986 | 27–22 | 55.1% | #41 | 1,731 | 0 | 1 | 1983 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #576 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1987 | 5–17 | 22.7% | #169 | 1,600 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1988 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #182 | 1,582 | 0 | 1 | 1985 | 17–11 | 60.7% | #86 | 1,670 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1989 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #183 | 1,532 | 0 | 1 | 1986 | 2–12 | 14.3% | #289 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1990 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #191 | 1,558 | 0 | 1 | 1987 | 29–18 | 61.7% | #36 | 1,793 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 1991 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #408 | 1,539 | 0 | 1 | 1988 | 15–23 | 39.5% | #119 | 1,607 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 30–18 | 62.5% | #38 | 1,707 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 1993 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #190 | 1,579 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 15–23 | 39.5% | #97 | 1,615 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 1994 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #388 | 1,542 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 4–13 | 23.5% | #193 | 1,512 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #207 | 1,560 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #447 | 1,580 | 0 | 3 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1198 | 1,570 | 0 | 3 |