H2H data updated: 2026-07-14 14:15 UTC
J. Fillol vs B. Fairlie H2H: 3-2
J. Fillol holds a 3–2 lead over B. Fairlie in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, B. Fairlie leads 2–1 on hard courts, while J. Fillol leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, B. Fairlie won the 1976 Palm Springs third round 3-6 7-5 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CHI
Age 80
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
3
–
2
5 main draw meetings
NZL
Age 78
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 25, 1976* | Palm Springs | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | B. Fairlie | 3-6 7-5 7-5 | J. Fillol | Match data |
| Apr 18, 1975* | Denver Wct | ATP 250 | R16 | Carpet | J. Fillol | 6-3 7-6(6) | B. Fairlie | Match data |
| Apr 12, 1974* | Orlando Wct | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | J. Fillol | 7-5 7-5 | B. Fairlie | Match data |
| Sep 3, 1972* | US Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Grass | J. Fillol | 6-4 7-5 6-3 | B. Fairlie | Match data |
| Feb 28, 1969* | Kingston | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | B. Fairlie | 6-3 2-6 7-5 | J. Fillol | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| J. Fillol | #1,171 | #14 | 8 | 2,041 | 532 | 367 | 59.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 7 |
| B. Fairlie | #332 | #24 | 0 | 1,916 | 233 | 220 | 51.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | J. Fillol | B. Fairlie | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1968 | 8–9 | 47.1% | — | 1,504 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1969 | 13–14 | 48.1% | — | 1,592 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1968 | 30–10 | 75.0% | — | 1,658 | 0 | 1 | 1970 | 36–20 | 64.3% | — | 1,800 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1969 | 27–19 | 58.7% | — | 1,673 | 0 | 1 | 1971 | 20–29 | 40.8% | — | 1,662 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1970 | 32–23 | 58.2% | — | 1,749 | 0 | 1 | 1972 | 13–27 | 32.5% | — | 1,720 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1971 | 43–21 | 67.2% | — | 1,774 | 0 | 3 | 1973 | 33–21 | 61.1% | #25 | 1,773 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 1972 | 44–32 | 57.9% | — | 1,745 | 0 | 3 | 1974 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #58 | 1,760 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 1973 | 51–33 | 60.7% | #17 | 1,867 | 0 | 4 | 1975 | 22–17 | 56.4% | #66 | 1,811 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 1974 | 48–32 | 60.0% | #31 | 1,830 | 0 | 4 | 1976 | 40–28 | 58.8% | #36 | 1,843 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 1975 | 56–27 | 67.5% | #16 | 1,962 | 0 | 4 | 1977 | 25–24 | 51.0% | #92 | 1,667 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | 1976 | 47–27 | 63.5% | #24 | 1,928 | 0 | 5 | 1978 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #123 | 1,648 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | 1977 | 44–21 | 67.7% | #24 | 1,894 | 0 | 5 | 1979 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #332 | 1,607 | 0 | 3 |
| 32 | 1978 | 33–29 | 53.2% | #77 | 1,756 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1979 | 21–28 | 42.9% | #124 | 1,736 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 1980 | 10–22 | 31.2% | #86 | 1,644 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 1981 | 18–19 | 48.6% | #95 | 1,654 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 1982 | 14–8 | 63.6% | #77 | 1,707 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 1983 | 14–16 | 46.7% | #85 | 1,649 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |