H2H data updated: 2026-07-14 14:15 UTC
J. Fillol vs C. Dibley H2H: 1-3
C. Dibley holds a 3–1 lead over J. Fillol in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, C. Dibley leads 2–0 on carpet, while they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, C. Dibley won the 1981 Denver third round 6-1 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CHI
Age 80
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
3
4 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 81
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 5, 1981* | Denver | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | C. Dibley | 6-1 6-2 | J. Fillol | Match data |
| Mar 31, 1977* | Los Angeles Psw | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | C. Dibley | 6-2 6-2 | J. Fillol | Match data |
| Feb 20, 1975* | La Costa Wct | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | J. Fillol | 7-6(2) 6-2 | C. Dibley | Match data |
| Sep 3, 1971* | South Orange | ATP 250 | R64 | Hard | C. Dibley | 6-4 6-7 6-3 | J. Fillol | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | J. Fillol | C. Dibley | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 22 | 1968 | 30–10 | 75.0% | — | 1,658 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1969 | 27–19 | 58.7% | — | 1,673 | 0 | 1 | 1968 | 3–2 | 60.0% | — | 1,521 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1970 | 32–23 | 58.2% | — | 1,749 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1971 | 43–21 | 67.2% | — | 1,774 | 0 | 3 | 1970 | 7–10 | 41.2% | — | 1,528 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1972 | 44–32 | 57.9% | — | 1,745 | 0 | 3 | 1971 | 41–21 | 66.1% | — | 1,757 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1973 | 51–33 | 60.7% | #17 | 1,867 | 0 | 4 | 1972 | 52–30 | 63.4% | — | 1,818 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 1974 | 48–32 | 60.0% | #31 | 1,830 | 0 | 4 | 1973 | 35–31 | 53.0% | #39 | 1,692 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | 1975 | 56–27 | 67.5% | #16 | 1,962 | 0 | 4 | 1974 | 35–36 | 49.3% | #87 | 1,689 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | 1976 | 47–27 | 63.5% | #24 | 1,928 | 0 | 5 | 1975 | 15–28 | 34.9% | #94 | 1,606 | 0 | 4 |
| 31 | 1977 | 44–21 | 67.7% | #24 | 1,894 | 0 | 5 | 1976 | 39–39 | 50.0% | #85 | 1,655 | 0 | 4 |
| 32 | 1978 | 33–29 | 53.2% | #77 | 1,756 | 0 | 5 | 1977 | 52–33 | 61.2% | #36 | 1,778 | 0 | 4 |
| 33 | 1979 | 21–28 | 42.9% | #124 | 1,736 | 0 | 5 | 1978 | 18–28 | 39.1% | #115 | 1,628 | 0 | 4 |
| 34 | 1980 | 10–22 | 31.2% | #86 | 1,644 | 0 | 5 | 1979 | 20–22 | 47.6% | #116 | 1,698 | 0 | 4 |
| 35 | 1981 | 18–19 | 48.6% | #95 | 1,654 | 0 | 6 | 1980 | 18–23 | 43.9% | #57 | 1,648 | 0 | 5 |
| 36 | 1982 | 14–8 | 63.6% | #77 | 1,707 | 0 | 7 | 1981 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #99 | 1,630 | 0 | 5 |
| 37 | 1983 | 14–16 | 46.7% | #85 | 1,649 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |