H2H data updated: 2026-07-14 14:15 UTC
J. Kriek vs T. Moor H2H: 4-2
J. Kriek holds a 4–2 lead over T. Moor in their ATP head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, J. Kriek leads 3–1 on hard courts and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, J. Kriek won the 1987 Memphis third round 6-2 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 68
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
4
–
2
6 main draw meetings
USA
Age 74
Left-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 12, 1987* | Memphis | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | J. Kriek | 6-2 6-3 | T. Moor | Match data |
| Sep 13, 1984* | Los Angeles | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | T. Moor | 4-6 7-6 6-1 | J. Kriek | Match data |
| Aug 2, 1984* | Livingston | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | J. Kriek | 7-5 7-6 | T. Moor | Match data |
| Feb 25, 1982* | Monterrey | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | J. Kriek | 6-4 6-4 | T. Moor | Match data |
| Apr 9, 1981* | Houston | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | T. Moor | 6-3 6-4 | J. Kriek | Match data |
| Apr 17, 1980* | Los Angeles | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | J. Kriek | 6-4 4-6 6-3 | T. Moor | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | J. Kriek | T. Moor | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 1977 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #278 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1978 | 22–11 | 66.7% | #27 | 1,781 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1979 | 33–22 | 60.0% | #35 | 1,879 | 0 | 1 | 1973 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #180 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1980 | 39–24 | 61.9% | #17 | 1,976 | 0 | 1 | 1974 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #318 | 1,476 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1981 | 38–15 | 71.7% | #19 | 1,955 | 1 | 4 | 1975 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #396 | 1,456 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1982 | 41–21 | 66.1% | #9 | 1,960 | 2 | 7 | 1976 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #71 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1983 | 39–19 | 67.2% | #15 | 1,952 | 2 | 10 | 1977 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #53 | 1,761 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1984 | 37–17 | 68.5% | #13 | 1,916 | 2 | 12 | 1978 | 35–32 | 52.2% | #73 | 1,760 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1985 | 43–21 | 67.2% | #14 | 1,907 | 2 | 13 | 1979 | 35–26 | 57.4% | #38 | 1,822 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 1986 | 21–14 | 60.0% | #23 | 1,880 | 2 | 13 | 1980 | 34–26 | 56.7% | #53 | 1,848 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 1987 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #48 | 1,737 | 2 | 14 | 1981 | 26–25 | 51.0% | #57 | 1,748 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 1988 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #39 | 1,788 | 2 | 14 | 1982 | 18–22 | 45.0% | #95 | 1,696 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 1989 | 12–10 | 54.5% | #52 | 1,700 | 2 | 14 | 1983 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #100 | 1,675 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #413 | 1,683 | 2 | 14 | 1984 | 28–19 | 59.6% | #34 | 1,796 | 0 | 2 |
| 33 | 1991 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #274 | 1,611 | 2 | 14 | 1985 | 13–22 | 37.1% | #104 | 1,616 | 0 | 2 |
| 34 | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1097 | 1,593 | 2 | 14 | 1986 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #621 | 1,562 | 0 | 2 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #552 | 1,567 | 0 | 2 |