H2H data updated: 2026-07-14 14:15 UTC
J. Kriek vs T. Tulasne H2H: 2-0
J. Kriek holds a 2–0 lead over T. Tulasne in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, J. Kriek leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, J. Kriek won the 1981 North Conway third round 6-3 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 68
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 63
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 31, 1981* | North Conway | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | J. Kriek | 6-3 6-0 | T. Tulasne | Match data |
| Jun 16, 1981* | Bristol | ATP 250 | R32 | Grass | J. Kriek | 6-4 6-4 | T. Tulasne | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| J. Kriek | #859 | #7 | 268 | 2,052 | 380 | 223 | 63.0% | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 14 |
| T. Tulasne | #1,117 | #10 | 334 | 1,937 | 215 | 206 | 51.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | J. Kriek | T. Tulasne | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #579 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #113 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 26–23 | 53.1% | #59 | 1,675 | 0 | 1 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 18–21 | 46.2% | #95 | 1,721 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 1977 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #278 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #82 | 1,661 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 1978 | 22–11 | 66.7% | #27 | 1,781 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 15–14 | 51.7% | #54 | 1,721 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1979 | 33–22 | 60.0% | #35 | 1,879 | 0 | 1 | 1985 | 34–21 | 61.8% | #23 | 1,878 | 0 | 4 |
| 22 | 1980 | 39–24 | 61.9% | #17 | 1,976 | 0 | 1 | 1986 | 37–21 | 63.8% | #20 | 1,758 | 0 | 5 |
| 23 | 1981 | 38–15 | 71.7% | #19 | 1,955 | 1 | 4 | 1987 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #57 | 1,684 | 0 | 5 |
| 24 | 1982 | 41–21 | 66.1% | #9 | 1,960 | 2 | 7 | 1988 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #75 | 1,675 | 0 | 5 |
| 25 | 1983 | 39–19 | 67.2% | #15 | 1,952 | 2 | 10 | 1989 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #127 | 1,607 | 0 | 5 |
| 26 | 1984 | 37–17 | 68.5% | #13 | 1,916 | 2 | 12 | 1990 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #158 | 1,532 | 0 | 5 |
| 27 | 1985 | 43–21 | 67.2% | #14 | 1,907 | 2 | 13 | 1991 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #374 | 1,493 | 0 | 5 |
| 28 | 1986 | 21–14 | 60.0% | #23 | 1,880 | 2 | 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1987 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #48 | 1,737 | 2 | 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1988 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #39 | 1,788 | 2 | 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1989 | 12–10 | 54.5% | #52 | 1,700 | 2 | 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #413 | 1,683 | 2 | 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1991 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #274 | 1,611 | 2 | 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1097 | 1,593 | 2 | 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |