H2H data updated: 2026-07-14 14:15 UTC
J. Mandarino vs D. Crealy H2H: 1-1
J. Mandarino and D. Crealy are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay. Most recently, D. Crealy won the 1972 Kitzbuhel semifinal 6-3 6-1 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BRA
Age 85
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 81
Right-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 27, 1972* | Kitzbuhel | ATP 250 | SF | Clay | D. Crealy | 6-3 6-1 6-1 | J. Mandarino | Match data |
| Jul 19, 1972* | Bastad | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | J. Mandarino | 7-5 6-0 | D. Crealy | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| J. Mandarino | #793 | #81 | 0 | 1,716 | 85 | 97 | 46.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| D. Crealy | #509 | #33 | 0 | 1,904 | 335 | 317 | 51.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | J. Mandarino | D. Crealy | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1968 | 31–16 | 66.0% | — | 1,650 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1969 | 30–23 | 56.6% | — | 1,641 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1970 | 32–21 | 60.4% | — | 1,700 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1971 | 10–23 | 30.3% | — | 1,609 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1968 | 25–13 | 65.8% | — | 1,694 | 0 | 0 | 1972 | 18–14 | 56.2% | — | 1,718 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 1969 | 10–12 | 45.5% | — | 1,592 | 0 | 0 | 1973 | 31–33 | 48.4% | #51 | 1,625 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 1970 | 5–6 | 45.5% | — | 1,625 | 0 | 0 | 1974 | 41–40 | 50.6% | #71 | 1,709 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 1971 | 11–9 | 55.0% | — | 1,645 | 0 | 0 | 1975 | 41–37 | 52.6% | #56 | 1,734 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | 1972 | 8–6 | 57.1% | — | 1,682 | 0 | 0 | 1976 | 46–34 | 57.5% | #38 | 1,779 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | 1973 | 8–18 | 30.8% | #104 | 1,642 | 0 | 0 | 1977 | 31–30 | 50.8% | #68 | 1,670 | 0 | 2 |
| 33 | 1974 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #129 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 | 1978 | 19–33 | 36.5% | #131 | 1,565 | 0 | 2 |
| 34 | 1975 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #120 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 1–10 | 9.1% | #274 | 1,497 | 0 | 2 |
| 35 | 1976 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #180 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #309 | 1,509 | 0 | 2 |
| 36 | 1977 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #414 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #309 | 1,507 | 0 | 2 |