H2H data updated: 2026-08-31 00:00 UTC

J. Mandarino vs Ove Bengtson H2H: 1-1

J. Mandarino and Ove Bengtson are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Ove Bengtson leads 1–0 on carpet, while J. Mandarino leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Ove Bengtson won the 1969 Dallas round of 16 6-0 3-6 6-3.

BRA Age 85 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1 1
2 main draw meetings
SWE Age 81 Right-Handed 196 cm / 6'5"

H2H Match Log

WinnerScoreLoserMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Ove Bengtson 6-0 3-6 6-3 J. Mandarino Match data Apr 25, 1969* R16 Dallas ATP 250 Carpet
J. Mandarino 6-3 6-4 1-6 4-6 6-0 Ove Bengtson Match data Jul 12, 1968* R16 Swedish Open ATP 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
J. Mandarino #793 #81 0 1,716 86 99 46.5% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ove Bengtson #261 #43 0 1,732 132 168 44.0% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age J. Mandarino Ove Bengtson
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
23 1968 5–6 45.5% 1,557 0 0
24 1969 24–14 63.2% 1,699 0 1
25 1970 1–4 20.0% 1,648 0 1
26 1971 6–7 46.2% 1,636 0 1
27 1968 25–14 64.1% 1,693 0 0 1972 17–24 41.5% 1,678 0 1
28 1969 10–12 45.5% 1,595 0 0 1973 22–27 44.9% #56 1,646 0 1
29 1970 5–6 45.5% 1,627 0 0 1974 12–20 37.5% #68 1,635 0 1
30 1971 11–9 55.0% 1,645 0 0 1975 2–15 11.8% #177 1,539 0 1
31 1972 8–6 57.1% 1,682 0 0 1976 13–11 54.2% #43 1,657 0 1
32 1973 9–19 32.1% #104 1,646 0 0 1977 12–13 48.0% #89 1,665 0 1
33 1974 6–10 37.5% #129 1,621 0 0 1978 14–15 48.3% #88 1,725 0 1
34 1975 8–12 40.0% #120 1,565 0 0 1979 4–12 25.0% #261 1,598 0 1
35 1976 4–9 30.8% #180 1,529 0 0
36 1977 0–2 0.0% #253 1,493 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age J. Mandarino Ove Bengtson
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
23 1968 1 3 4 25.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
24 1969 8 4 12 66.7% 4 3 7 57.1% 9 3 12 75.0% 3 4 7 42.9%
25 1970 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
26 1971 4 4 8 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
27 1968 6 4 10 60.0% 17 9 26 65.4% 2 1 3 66.7% 1972 3 6 9 33.3% 4 6 10 40.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 9 9 18 50.0%
28 1969 0 3 3 0.0% 10 5 15 66.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1973 7 10 17 41.2% 3 5 8 37.5% 2 3 5 40.0% 10 9 19 52.6%
29 1970 2 2 4 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 1974 6 4 10 60.0% 1 7 8 12.5% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 6 10 40.0%
30 1971 5 3 8 62.5% 4 4 8 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1975 1 6 7 14.3% 0 4 4 0.0% 1 5 6 16.7%
31 1972 1 1 2 50.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1976 5 3 8 62.5% 2 3 5 40.0% 4 1 5 80.0% 2 4 6 33.3%
32 1973 2 5 7 28.6% 6 7 13 46.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 6 7 14.3% 1977 6 9 15 40.0% 6 4 10 60.0%
33 1974 0 1 1 0.0% 5 7 12 41.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1978 7 5 12 58.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 4 6 10 40.0%
34 1975 8 10 18 44.4% 0 2 2 0.0% 1979 1 6 7 14.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 3 3 0.0%
35 1976 4 8 12 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
36 1977 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
Career 16 19 35 45.7% 62 57 119 52.1% 6 13 19 31.6% 2 10 12 16.7% 48 58 106 45.3% 19 37 56 33.9% 25 22 47 53.2% 40 51 91 44.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age J. Mandarino Ove Bengtson
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Schedule
23 1968 1558 109.4 -67 -17 45.5% -0.18 2–1 (67%) -1.21
24 1969 1699 122.0 +49 -151 -25 58.8% +0.65 10–5 (67%) +3.21
25 1970 1649 106.8 -104 37.5% -1.19 0–1 -0.47
26 1971 1636 112.8 +63 -23 47.4% -0.34 2–2 (50%) 3–1 (75%) +0.19
27 1968 1694 122.3 -84 +39 -137 61.0% +0.86 4–3 (57%) +0.02 1972 1679 130.8 +45 -99 -132 46.0% -0.24 4–10 (29%) 3–3 (50%) +1.02
28 1969 1595 108.5 -85 +141 50.9% +0.22 1–3 (25%) +2.82 1973 1647 123.8 +16 -57 -86 44.3% -0.42 4–6 (40%) 10–6 (63%) +2.04
29 1970 1628 121.9 -78 +78 -48 51.5% -0.06 0–2 +0.28 1974 1636 126.2 +34 -130 -46 39.2% -0.96 2–7 (22%) 13–6 (68%) -1.62
30 1971 1645 115.8 -45 +50 -65 51.1% +0.08 2–1 (67%) 2–1 (67%) +0.81 1975 1540 122.9 +28 -64 26.2% -1.57 1–7 (13%) 2–5 (29%) -1.08
31 1972 1683 116.4 +101 51.1% -0.16 2–1 (67%) 3–1 (75%) +1.29 1976 1657 131.0 -19 -165 +36 53.6% +0.04 4–4 (50%) 6–2 (75%) +1.17
32 1973 1647 128.4 -68 +99 34.8% -0.82 4–4 (50%) 1–5 (17%) -1.89 1977 1666 124.8 0 46.3% -0.43 3–1 (75%) 8–3 (73%) +1.91
33 1974 1622 120.3 +97 34.2% -1.08 3–3 (50%) -0.11 1978 1726 135.2 -9 -188 -18 50.0% -0.32 6–7 (46%) 12–6 (67%) +0.31
34 1975 1566 122.3 +83 42.9% -0.24 3–5 (38%) 0–4 (0%) +0.94 1979 1598 117.7 -27 +138 36.4% -0.71 3–5 (38%) 1–8 (11%) +0.48
35 1976 1529 106.7 +56 33.3% -1.12 2–1 (67%) 0–2 +0.74
36 1977 1493 100.7 0.0% -3.00 0–1 +0.24
Career 1716 125.0 -70 +80 -82 47.4% -0.10 21–23 (48%) 6–14 (30%) +2.92 1732 131.5 +18 -112 -17 45.9% -0.35 41–56 (42%) 58–40 (59%) +2.02

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.