H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC
Jacco Eltingh holds a 1–0 lead over Alex Obrien in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jacco Eltingh leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Jacco Eltingh won the 1994 Tokyo Indoor round of 32 6-4 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jacco Eltingh | 6-4 7-5 | Alex Obrien | Match data | Oct 13, 1994* | R32 | Tokyo Indoor | ATP Championship Series → modern equivalent ATP 500 | Carpet |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jacco Eltingh | #1,378 | #19 | 1,332 | 1,876 | 124 | 141 | 46.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Alex Obrien | — | — | — | 1,794 | — | — | — | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Jacco Eltingh | Alex Obrien | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1989 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #276 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1990 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #128 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1991 | 12–24 | 33.3% | #114 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1992 | 18–22 | 45.0% | #78 | 1,591 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1993 | 22–26 | 45.8% | #63 | 1,634 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1994 | 40–23 | 63.5% | #23 | 1,829 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1995 | 24–26 | 48.0% | #43 | 1,772 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1996 | 4–12 | 25.0% | #307 | 1,617 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1997 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #604 | 1,557 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Jacco Eltingh | Alex Obrien | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | ||
| 1989 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1990 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 3 | 1 | 4 | 75.0% | 1992 | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 1991 | 4 | 12 | 16 | 25.0% | 3 | 7 | 10 | 30.0% | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 1993 | 8 | 14 | 22 | 36.4% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 1992 | 4 | 7 | 11 | 36.4% | 7 | 8 | 15 | 46.7% | 5 | 2 | 7 | 71.4% | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | 1994 | 11 | 12 | 23 | 47.8% | 1 | 5 | 6 | 16.7% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% |
| 1993 | 10 | 13 | 23 | 43.5% | 8 | 6 | 14 | 57.1% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 1995 | 4 | 9 | 13 | 30.8% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% |
| 1994 | 10 | 8 | 18 | 55.6% | 11 | 7 | 18 | 61.1% | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | 14 | 5 | 19 | 73.7% | 1996 | 15 | 8 | 23 | 65.2% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% |
| 1995 | 5 | 9 | 14 | 35.7% | 5 | 7 | 12 | 41.7% | 8 | 3 | 11 | 72.7% | 6 | 7 | 13 | 46.2% | 1997 | 10 | 14 | 24 | 41.7% | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% |
| 1996 | 3 | 8 | 11 | 27.3% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1998 | 5 | 8 | 13 | 38.5% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 1997 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 1999 | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | 37 | 59 | 96 | 38.5% | 34 | 36 | 70 | 48.6% | 26 | 19 | 45 | 57.8% | 27 | 27 | 54 | 50.0% | Career | 62 | 80 | 142 | 43.7% | 7 | 20 | 27 | 25.9% | 13 | 18 | 31 | 41.9% | 7 | 12 | 19 | 36.8% |
Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Jacco Eltingh | Alex Obrien | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule |
| 1989 | 1490 | 100.6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.50 | — | — | — | -0.02 | 1991 | 1517 | 112.7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 50.0% | +0.25 | — | 0–1 | — | -0.11 |
| 1990 | 1525 | 104.0 | — | — | — | — | +51 | — | — | 61.5% | +0.85 | 1–2 (33%) | 1–4 (20%) | 96.6 | +0.66 | 1992 | 1539 | 119.0 | — | — | — | — | +46 | — | — | 40.0% | -0.90 | 1–1 | 4–1 (80%) | — | 0.00 |
| 1991 | 1510 | 114.5 | -1.53 | -5.09 | 0.781 | 45.9% | -36 | +33 | +133 | 35.1% | -1.07 | 4–5 (44%) | 7–5 (58%) | 102.4 | +1.29 | 1993 | 1540 | 120.7 | — | — | — | — | +25 | +21 | -29 | 41.3% | -0.76 | 4–7 (36%) | 8–4 (67%) | 100.5 | -0.23 |
| 1992 | 1591 | 132.8 | +2.27 | -3.70 | 0.949 | 49.5% | -101 | +22 | +152 | 44.1% | -0.41 | 8–8 (50%) | 10–10 (50%) | 105.3 | -1.05 | 1994 | 1627 | 133.6 | — | — | — | — | +25 | -93 | -105 | 45.3% | -0.40 | 5–10 (33%) | 9–6 (60%) | 98.5 | -0.65 |
| 1993 | 1635 | 126.1 | +1.74 | -3.99 | 0.916 | 48.5% | -80 | +16 | +85 | 44.6% | -0.42 | 5–2 (71%) | 10–7 (59%) | 106.8 | -0.27 | 1995 | 1557 | 125.1 | — | — | — | — | +31 | -56 | -20 | 32.2% | -0.90 | 2–5 (29%) | 3–3 (50%) | 98.1 | -0.97 |
| 1994 | 1829 | 139.4 | +3.57 | -2.91 | 1.009 | 50.3% | -35 | -81 | -105 | 60.4% | +0.25 | 11–9 (55%) | 33–10 (77%) | 113.1 | +2.23 | 1996 | 1759 | 146.1 | — | — | — | — | +15 | — | — | 59.2% | +0.39 | 6–5 (55%) | 8–5 (62%) | 106.8 | +0.66 |
| 1995 | 1772 | 145.8 | +3.15 | -2.97 | 0.973 | 50.2% | -44 | -33 | +79 | 50.7% | +0.03 | 7–8 (47%) | 14–10 (58%) | 102.1 | -1.27 | 1997 | 1634 | 132.7 | — | — | — | — | +19 | -148 | +27 | 46.7% | -0.07 | 7–14 (33%) | 12–14 (46%) | 95.7 | +0.79 |
| 1996 | 1618 | 118.1 | +0.37 | -3.11 | 0.871 | 47.9% | +14 | — | +178 | 32.5% | -1.05 | 1–4 (20%) | 5–5 (50%) | 94.7 | -0.29 | 1998 | 1638 | 120.6 | — | — | — | — | +5 | -194 | -12 | 41.0% | -0.61 | 2–6 (25%) | 4–4 (50%) | 97.2 | -0.70 |
| 1997 | 1557 | 105.0 | +1.00 | -1.87 | 0.932 | 48.8% | +19 | — | — | 31.3% | -0.50 | 0–2 | 1–5 (17%) | — | +0.30 | 1999 | 1625 | 122.3 | — | — | — | — | +24 | — | — | 31.6% | -1.21 | 1–0 | 1–0 | — | -0.46 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 1648 | 113.8 | — | — | — | — | -20 | — | — | 36.4% | -0.59 | 1–1 | 1–3 (25%) | — | +0.21 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 1628 | 110.2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 28.6% | -1.28 | 0–1 | 1–1 | — | -0.08 |
| Career | 1876 | 135.5 | +1.94 | -3.58 | 0.927 | 49.0% | -45 | -14 | +74 | 47.3% | -0.28 | 37–40 (48%) | 81–56 (59%) | 108.3 | +0.60 | Career | 1795 | 135.4 | — | — | — | — | +20 | -85 | -27 | 43.8% | -0.41 | 29–50 (37%) | 51–42 (55%) | 100.1 | -0.71 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andre Agassi | 1 | 5 | 6 | Jul 18, 1996 | H2H |
| Richey Reneberg | 0 | 6 | 6 | Feb 23, 1995 | H2H |
| MaliVai Washington | 1 | 3 | 4 | Jan 15, 1997 | H2H |
| Emilio Sanchez | 0 | 4 | 4 | Jan 12, 1996 | H2H |
| Michael Chang | 2 | 2 | 4 | Dec 9, 1995 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Richard Krajicek | 2 | 4 | 6 | Sep 4, 1998 | — |
| David Wheaton | 0 | 6 | 6 | Sep 1, 1996 | — |
| Jonathan Stark | 1 | 4 | 5 | Feb 15, 1995 | — |
| Gianluca Pozzi | 2 | 2 | 4 | Jan 17, 2001 | — |
| Alex Corretja | 1 | 3 | 4 | Aug 12, 1998 | — |