H2H data updated: 2026-09-10 00:00 UTC

Jacco Eltingh vs Kevin Curren H2H: 1-0

Jacco Eltingh holds a 1–0 lead over Kevin Curren in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jacco Eltingh leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Jacco Eltingh won the 1992 Eastbourne Open round of 32 6-3 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jacco Eltingh
NED Age 56 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Kevin Curren
USA Age 68 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Jacco Eltingh #97 6-3 6-4 Kevin Curren #93 Match data Jun 18, 1992* R32 Eastbourne Open ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Jacco Eltingh #1,378 #19 1,332 1,876 124 141 46.8% 0 0 0 0 4 4
Kevin Curren #1,179 #5 684 2,088 339 238 58.8% 0 0 0 0 5 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jacco Eltingh Kevin Curren
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1989 0–1 0.0% #276 1,490 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1990 3–2 60.0% #128 1,525 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 1991 12–24 33.3% #114 1,510 0 0 1978 1–2 33.3% #91 1,510 0 0
21 1992 18–22 45.0% #78 1,591 0 1 1979 7–14 33.3% #197 1,550 0 0
22 1993 22–26 45.8% #63 1,634 0 2 1980 16–13 55.2% #55 1,770 0 0
23 1994 40–23 63.5% #23 1,829 0 4 1981 23–18 56.1% #50 1,768 0 1
24 1995 24–26 48.0% #43 1,772 0 4 1982 33–17 66.0% #17 1,944 0 2
25 1996 4–12 25.0% #307 1,617 0 4 1983 32–20 61.5% #9 1,932 0 2
26 1997 1–5 16.7% #604 1,557 0 4 1984 32–17 65.3% #15 1,958 0 2
27 — — — — — — — 1985 25–13 65.8% #10 1,917 0 3
28 — — — — — — — 1986 35–17 67.3% #18 1,892 0 4
29 — — — — — — — 1987 21–17 55.3% #37 1,808 0 4
30 — — — — — — — 1988 31–15 67.4% #23 1,812 0 4
31 — — — — — — — 1989 33–18 64.7% #20 1,830 0 5
32 — — — — — — — 1990 20–19 51.3% #71 1,798 0 5
33 — — — — — — — 1991 18–20 47.4% #58 1,701 0 5
34 — — — — — — — 1992 12–17 41.4% #147 1,659 0 5
35 — — — — — — — 1993 0–1 0.0% #1178 1,637 0 5

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Jacco Eltingh Kevin Curren
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 1989 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1990 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1991 4 12 16 25.0% 3 7 10 30.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 1978 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1992 4 7 11 36.4% 7 8 15 46.7% 5 2 7 71.4% 2 5 7 28.6% 1979 4 10 14 28.6% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
22 1993 10 13 23 43.5% 8 6 14 57.1% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 1980 9 6 15 60.0% — — — — 7 4 11 63.6% 0 3 3 0.0%
23 1994 10 8 18 55.6% 11 7 18 61.1% 5 3 8 62.5% 14 5 19 73.7% 1981 13 8 21 61.9% 2 2 4 50.0% 8 5 13 61.5% 0 3 3 0.0%
24 1995 5 9 14 35.7% 5 7 12 41.7% 8 3 11 72.7% 6 7 13 46.2% 1982 8 3 11 72.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 6 2 8 75.0% 19 11 30 63.3%
25 1996 3 8 11 27.3% — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1983 7 5 12 58.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 9 2 11 81.8% 15 10 25 60.0%
26 1997 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1984 5 2 7 71.4% 1 1 2 50.0% 13 4 17 76.5% 13 10 23 56.5%
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 3 6 9 33.3% — — — — 8 2 10 80.0% 14 5 19 73.7%
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 16 8 24 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 17 6 23 73.9%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 14 9 23 60.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 3 4 7 42.9%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 21 9 30 70.0% — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% 7 4 11 63.6%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 19 10 29 65.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 10 5 15 66.7%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 8 8 16 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 5 2 7 71.4% 6 7 13 46.2%
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 7 11 18 38.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 9 6 15 60.0%
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 10 12 22 45.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 37 59 96 38.5% 34 36 70 48.6% 26 19 45 57.8% 27 27 54 50.0% — 145 110 255 56.9% 8 16 24 33.3% 71 36 107 66.4% 115 76 191 60.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Jacco Eltingh Kevin Curren
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 1989 1490 100.6 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.02 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1990 1525 104.0 — — — — +51 — — 61.5% +0.85 1–2 (33%) 1–4 (20%) 96.6 +0.66 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1991 1510 114.5 -1.53 -5.09 0.781 45.9% -36 +33 +133 35.1% -1.07 4–5 (44%) 7–5 (58%) 102.4 +1.29 1978 1510 108.2 — — — — +45 — — 42.9% 0.00 0–1 1–1 — -0.02
21 1992 1591 132.8 +2.27 -3.70 0.949 49.5% -101 +22 +152 44.1% -0.41 8–8 (50%) 10–10 (50%) 105.3 -1.05 1979 1550 117.1 — — — — +10 — — 40.0% -0.72 1–5 (17%) 6–2 (75%) 100.2 +0.18
22 1993 1635 126.1 +1.74 -3.99 0.916 48.5% -80 +16 +85 44.6% -0.42 5–2 (71%) 10–7 (59%) 106.8 -0.27 1980 1770 143.7 — — — — -96 — 0 54.9% +0.44 6–7 (46%) 7–10 (41%) 101.4 -0.62
23 1994 1829 139.4 +3.57 -2.91 1.009 50.3% -35 -81 -105 60.4% +0.25 11–9 (55%) 33–10 (77%) 113.1 +2.23 1981 1768 137.7 — — — — -11 -234 -8 55.1% +0.31 7–6 (54%) 9–9 (50%) 101.3 -0.60
24 1995 1772 145.8 +3.15 -2.97 0.973 50.2% -44 -33 +79 50.7% +0.03 7–8 (47%) 14–10 (58%) 102.1 -1.27 1982 1945 163.1 — — — — -10 — -133 62.7% +0.91 6–4 (60%) 5–9 (36%) 100.7 -5.36
25 1996 1618 118.1 +0.37 -3.11 0.871 47.9% +14 — +178 32.5% -1.05 1–4 (20%) 5–5 (50%) 94.7 -0.29 1983 1932 158.2 — — — — -8 -408 +68 61.0% +0.59 4–7 (36%) 14–10 (58%) 99.7 -3.15
26 1997 1557 105.0 +1.00 -1.87 0.932 48.8% +19 — — 31.3% -0.50 0–2 1–5 (17%) — +0.30 1984 1959 146.2 — — — — -46 — +79 59.9% +0.51 11–5 (69%) 13–11 (54%) 102.6 +0.12
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 1918 150.2 — — — — -82 — +233 67.4% +0.87 2–5 (29%) 13–11 (54%) 92.3 -0.51
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 1893 151.4 — — — — +28 — +158 63.8% +0.73 9–8 (53%) 20–14 (59%) 98.3 -0.41
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 1809 144.7 — — — — +41 — +158 53.9% +0.32 6–5 (55%) 9–13 (41%) 95.6 -1.25
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 1813 143.0 — — — — +19 — +62 61.9% +0.75 13–6 (68%) 11–10 (52%) 101.7 +0.26
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 1830 149.5 — — — — +48 — +2 61.7% +0.93 12–10 (55%) 13–9 (59%) 98.4 +0.21
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 1798 141.4 — — — — -9 -239 +65 52.4% +0.25 8–6 (57%) 12–11 (52%) 99.8 -1.04
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 1702 140.1 +1.54 -1.53 0.983 49.8% 0 — +133 48.0% +0.04 9–9 (50%) 11–12 (48%) 95.6 -2.21
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 1660 128.6 +0.39 -1.70 0.925 48.5% +15 — +118 45.1% -0.37 3–6 (33%) 1–8 (11%) 89.5 -0.53
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 1637 94.8 -1.10 -2.26 0.501 33.7% — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.19
Career — 1876 135.5 +1.94 -3.58 0.927 49.0% -45 -14 +74 47.3% -0.28 37–40 (48%) 81–56 (59%) 108.3 +0.60 — 2088 153.7 +1.04 -1.61 0.946 49.0% -1 -299 +63 57.4% +0.47 97–90 (52%) 145–140 (51%) 95.6 -2.59

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.