H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC
Jacco Eltingh and Martin Damm Sr are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Martin Damm Sr leads 1–0 on carpet, while Jacco Eltingh leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Jacco Eltingh won the 1994 Eastbourne Open round of 16 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jacco Eltingh | 6-4 6-4 | Martin Damm Sr | Match data | Jun 17, 1994* | R16 | Eastbourne Open | ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 | Grass |
| Martin Damm Sr | 6-2 7-6(3) | Jacco Eltingh | Match data | Nov 11, 1993* | R32 | Moscow | ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 | Carpet |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jacco Eltingh | #1,378 | #19 | 1,332 | 1,876 | 124 | 141 | 46.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Martin Damm Sr | — | — | — | 1,731 | — | — | — | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Jacco Eltingh | Martin Damm Sr | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1989 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #276 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1990 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #128 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1991 | 12–24 | 33.3% | #114 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1992 | 18–22 | 45.0% | #78 | 1,591 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1993 | 22–26 | 45.8% | #63 | 1,634 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1994 | 40–23 | 63.5% | #23 | 1,829 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1995 | 24–26 | 48.0% | #43 | 1,772 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1996 | 4–12 | 25.0% | #307 | 1,617 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1997 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #604 | 1,557 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Jacco Eltingh | Martin Damm Sr | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | ||
| 1989 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1990 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 3 | 1 | 4 | 75.0% | 1990 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1991 | 4 | 12 | 16 | 25.0% | 3 | 7 | 10 | 30.0% | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 1991 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% |
| 1992 | 4 | 7 | 11 | 36.4% | 7 | 8 | 15 | 46.7% | 5 | 2 | 7 | 71.4% | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | 1992 | 6 | 8 | 14 | 42.9% | 0 | 5 | 5 | 0.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| 1993 | 10 | 13 | 23 | 43.5% | 8 | 6 | 14 | 57.1% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 1993 | 7 | 11 | 18 | 38.9% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 8 | 6 | 14 | 57.1% |
| 1994 | 10 | 8 | 18 | 55.6% | 11 | 7 | 18 | 61.1% | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | 14 | 5 | 19 | 73.7% | 1994 | 7 | 12 | 19 | 36.8% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 4 | 7 | 11 | 36.4% |
| 1995 | 5 | 9 | 14 | 35.7% | 5 | 7 | 12 | 41.7% | 8 | 3 | 11 | 72.7% | 6 | 7 | 13 | 46.2% | 1995 | 7 | 13 | 20 | 35.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 7 | 6 | 13 | 53.8% |
| 1996 | 3 | 8 | 11 | 27.3% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1996 | 15 | 13 | 28 | 53.6% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 13 | 10 | 23 | 56.5% |
| 1997 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 1997 | 10 | 13 | 23 | 43.5% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 10 | 7 | 17 | 58.8% |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 10 | 14 | 24 | 41.7% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 6 | 8 | 14 | 42.9% |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 5 | 9 | 14 | 35.7% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 6 | 11 | 17 | 35.3% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 5 | 2 | 7 | 71.4% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | — | — | — | — |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | 37 | 59 | 96 | 38.5% | 34 | 36 | 70 | 48.6% | 26 | 19 | 45 | 57.8% | 27 | 27 | 54 | 50.0% | Career | 74 | 107 | 181 | 40.9% | 6 | 28 | 34 | 17.6% | 22 | 24 | 46 | 47.8% | 51 | 49 | 100 | 51.0% |
Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Jacco Eltingh | Martin Damm Sr | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule |
| 1989 | 1490 | 100.6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.50 | — | — | — | -0.02 | 1989 | 1492 | 98.3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -5.00 | — | — | — | -0.08 |
| 1990 | 1525 | 104.0 | — | — | — | — | +51 | — | — | 61.5% | +0.85 | 1–2 (33%) | 1–4 (20%) | 96.6 | +0.66 | 1990 | 1478 | 98.3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -2.50 | — | — | — | +0.15 |
| 1991 | 1510 | 114.5 | -1.53 | -5.09 | 0.781 | 45.9% | -36 | +33 | +133 | 35.1% | -1.07 | 4–5 (44%) | 7–5 (58%) | 102.4 | +1.29 | 1991 | 1504 | 104.7 | — | — | — | — | +57 | — | — | 57.1% | +0.57 | 1–0 | 0–1 | — | +0.21 |
| 1992 | 1591 | 132.8 | +2.27 | -3.70 | 0.949 | 49.5% | -101 | +22 | +152 | 44.1% | -0.41 | 8–8 (50%) | 10–10 (50%) | 105.3 | -1.05 | 1992 | 1546 | 125.4 | — | — | — | — | +65 | -88 | — | 35.1% | -0.91 | 4–1 (80%) | 2–5 (29%) | 103.3 | +0.26 |
| 1993 | 1635 | 126.1 | +1.74 | -3.99 | 0.916 | 48.5% | -80 | +16 | +85 | 44.6% | -0.42 | 5–2 (71%) | 10–7 (59%) | 106.8 | -0.27 | 1993 | 1647 | 128.4 | — | — | — | — | +28 | -196 | — | 44.8% | -0.40 | 6–6 (50%) | 8–5 (62%) | 105.4 | +0.61 |
| 1994 | 1829 | 139.4 | +3.57 | -2.91 | 1.009 | 50.3% | -35 | -81 | -105 | 60.4% | +0.25 | 11–9 (55%) | 33–10 (77%) | 113.1 | +2.23 | 1994 | 1630 | 133.5 | — | — | — | — | -23 | -172 | +21 | 44.4% | -0.32 | 3–13 (19%) | 9–10 (47%) | 92.4 | -0.61 |
| 1995 | 1772 | 145.8 | +3.15 | -2.97 | 0.973 | 50.2% | -44 | -33 | +79 | 50.7% | +0.03 | 7–8 (47%) | 14–10 (58%) | 102.1 | -1.27 | 1995 | 1619 | 133.0 | — | — | — | — | +8 | — | — | 42.3% | -0.55 | 9–8 (53%) | 11–11 (50%) | 102.9 | -0.27 |
| 1996 | 1618 | 118.1 | +0.37 | -3.11 | 0.871 | 47.9% | +14 | — | +178 | 32.5% | -1.05 | 1–4 (20%) | 5–5 (50%) | 94.7 | -0.29 | 1996 | 1709 | 139.5 | — | — | — | — | +35 | — | -23 | 47.9% | -0.08 | 13–8 (62%) | 13–18 (42%) | 102.9 | +1.26 |
| 1997 | 1557 | 105.0 | +1.00 | -1.87 | 0.932 | 48.8% | +19 | — | — | 31.3% | -0.50 | 0–2 | 1–5 (17%) | — | +0.30 | 1997 | 1694 | 135.4 | — | — | — | — | +35 | -281 | +7 | 48.3% | -0.18 | 8–7 (53%) | 16–10 (62%) | 105.2 | +0.62 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 1649 | 132.2 | — | — | — | — | +16 | — | +23 | 42.9% | -0.50 | 7–7 (50%) | 8–11 (42%) | 98.6 | -0.31 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 1578 | 123.5 | — | — | — | — | +27 | -177 | +52 | 39.1% | -0.78 | 1–7 (13%) | 3–5 (38%) | 90.9 | -0.57 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 1615 | 127.5 | — | — | — | — | -72 | -159 | +102 | 44.2% | -0.34 | 7–3 (70%) | 6–9 (40%) | 105.2 | +0.30 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 1514 | 96.3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | +91 | 15.0% | -1.90 | — | 0–2 | — | +0.77 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 1525 | 111.4 | — | — | — | — | +15 | — | — | 37.5% | -0.75 | — | 1–1 | — | -0.13 |
| Career | 1876 | 135.5 | +1.94 | -3.58 | 0.927 | 49.0% | -45 | -14 | +74 | 47.3% | -0.28 | 37–40 (48%) | 81–56 (59%) | 108.3 | +0.60 | Career | 1732 | 136.6 | — | — | — | — | +17 | -170 | +36 | 43.3% | -0.43 | 59–60 (50%) | 77–88 (47%) | 101.6 | +0.62 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andre Agassi | 1 | 5 | 6 | Jul 18, 1996 | H2H |
| Richey Reneberg | 0 | 6 | 6 | Feb 23, 1995 | H2H |
| MaliVai Washington | 1 | 3 | 4 | Jan 15, 1997 | H2H |
| Emilio Sanchez | 0 | 4 | 4 | Jan 12, 1996 | H2H |
| Michael Chang | 2 | 2 | 4 | Dec 9, 1995 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cedric Pioline | 2 | 7 | 9 | Jun 23, 1999 | — |
| Patrick Rafter | 1 | 7 | 8 | Jun 24, 2000 | — |
| Thomas Johansson | 3 | 4 | 7 | May 4, 2000 | — |
| Byron Black | 2 | 5 | 7 | Aug 18, 1999 | — |
| Goran Ivanisevic | 0 | 5 | 5 | Jan 16, 2002 | — |