H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Jaime Fillol vs Balazs Taroczy H2H: 1-2
Balazs Taroczy holds a 2–1 lead over Jaime Fillol in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Balazs Taroczy leads 2–0 on clay, while Jaime Fillol leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Balazs Taroczy won the 1978 Madrid quarterfinal 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CHI
Age 80
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
HUN
Age 72
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 13, 1978* | Madrid | ATP 250 | QF | Clay | Balazs Taroczy | 6-3 6-3 | Jaime Fillol | Match data |
| Aug 8, 1977 | Indianapolis | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Balazs Taroczy | 6-1 6-2 | Jaime Fillol | Match data |
| Nov 7, 1973* | Stockholm | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Jaime Fillol | 6-3 6-3 | Balazs Taroczy | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jaime Fillol | #1,171 | #14 | 8 | 2,041 | 532 | 367 | 59.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 7 |
| Balazs Taroczy | #732 | #12 | 0 | 2,003 | 381 | 228 | 62.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 13 | 13 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jaime Fillol | Balazs Taroczy | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1972 | 4–3 | 57.1% | — | 1,563 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1973 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #193 | 1,553 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1974 | 21–12 | 63.6% | #38 | 1,771 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1975 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #69 | 1,811 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1968 | 30–10 | 75.0% | — | 1,658 | 0 | 1 | 1976 | 37–19 | 66.1% | #31 | 1,866 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1969 | 27–19 | 58.7% | — | 1,673 | 0 | 1 | 1977 | 38–23 | 62.3% | #32 | 1,852 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1970 | 32–23 | 58.2% | — | 1,749 | 0 | 1 | 1978 | 44–18 | 71.0% | #20 | 1,907 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | 1971 | 43–21 | 67.2% | — | 1,774 | 0 | 3 | 1979 | 41–22 | 65.1% | #42 | 1,812 | 0 | 6 |
| 26 | 1972 | 44–32 | 57.9% | — | 1,745 | 0 | 3 | 1980 | 46–16 | 74.2% | #22 | 1,931 | 0 | 9 |
| 27 | 1973 | 51–33 | 60.7% | #17 | 1,867 | 0 | 4 | 1981 | 45–17 | 72.6% | #15 | 1,937 | 0 | 11 |
| 28 | 1974 | 48–32 | 60.0% | #31 | 1,830 | 0 | 4 | 1982 | 43–24 | 64.2% | #27 | 1,859 | 0 | 13 |
| 29 | 1975 | 56–27 | 67.5% | #16 | 1,962 | 0 | 4 | 1983 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #52 | 1,781 | 0 | 13 |
| 30 | 1976 | 47–27 | 63.5% | #24 | 1,928 | 0 | 5 | 1984 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #43 | 1,748 | 0 | 13 |
| 31 | 1977 | 44–21 | 67.7% | #24 | 1,894 | 0 | 5 | 1985 | 9–17 | 34.6% | #157 | 1,643 | 0 | 13 |
| 32 | 1978 | 33–29 | 53.2% | #77 | 1,756 | 0 | 5 | 1986 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #382 | 1,641 | 0 | 13 |
| 33 | 1979 | 21–28 | 42.9% | #124 | 1,736 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 1980 | 10–22 | 31.2% | #86 | 1,644 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 1981 | 18–19 | 48.6% | #95 | 1,654 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 1982 | 14–8 | 63.6% | #77 | 1,707 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 1983 | 14–16 | 46.7% | #85 | 1,649 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |