H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Jaime Fillol vs Carlos Kirmayr H2H: 3-0
Jaime Fillol holds a 3–0 lead over Carlos Kirmayr in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Jaime Fillol leads 3–0 on clay. Most recently, Jaime Fillol won the 1978 Hamburg second round 6-3 6-7 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CHI
Age 80
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
3
–
0
3 main draw meetings
BRA
Age 75
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 17, 1978* | Hamburg | ATP 250 | R64 | Clay | Jaime Fillol | 6-3 6-7 6-2 | Carlos Kirmayr | Match data |
| Nov 25, 1977* | Buenos Aires | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Jaime Fillol | 6-4 7-5 | Carlos Kirmayr | Match data |
| Jun 2, 1976* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Jaime Fillol | 6-2 6-2 6-4 | Carlos Kirmayr | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jaime Fillol | #1,171 | #14 | 8 | 2,041 | 532 | 367 | 59.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 7 |
| Carlos Kirmayr | #621 | #36 | 0 | 1,892 | 135 | 157 | 46.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jaime Fillol | Carlos Kirmayr | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1972 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1968 | 30–10 | 75.0% | — | 1,658 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1969 | 27–19 | 58.7% | — | 1,673 | 0 | 1 | 1974 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #318 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1970 | 32–23 | 58.2% | — | 1,749 | 0 | 1 | 1975 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #103 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1971 | 43–21 | 67.2% | — | 1,774 | 0 | 3 | 1976 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #119 | 1,582 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1972 | 44–32 | 57.9% | — | 1,745 | 0 | 3 | 1977 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #120 | 1,609 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1973 | 51–33 | 60.7% | #17 | 1,867 | 0 | 4 | 1978 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #78 | 1,626 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1974 | 48–32 | 60.0% | #31 | 1,830 | 0 | 4 | 1979 | 24–19 | 55.8% | #57 | 1,695 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1975 | 56–27 | 67.5% | #16 | 1,962 | 0 | 4 | 1980 | 18–13 | 58.1% | #64 | 1,713 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 1976 | 47–27 | 63.5% | #24 | 1,928 | 0 | 5 | 1981 | 27–16 | 62.8% | #41 | 1,804 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 1977 | 44–21 | 67.7% | #24 | 1,894 | 0 | 5 | 1982 | 24–23 | 51.1% | #52 | 1,779 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | 1978 | 33–29 | 53.2% | #77 | 1,756 | 0 | 5 | 1983 | 4–14 | 22.2% | #86 | 1,622 | 0 | 1 |
| 33 | 1979 | 21–28 | 42.9% | #124 | 1,736 | 0 | 5 | 1984 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #609 | 1,596 | 0 | 1 |
| 34 | 1980 | 10–22 | 31.2% | #86 | 1,644 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 1981 | 18–19 | 48.6% | #95 | 1,654 | 0 | 6 | 1986 | 2–10 | 16.7% | #119 | 1,499 | 0 | 1 |
| 36 | 1982 | 14–8 | 63.6% | #77 | 1,707 | 0 | 7 | 1987 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #565 | 1,478 | 0 | 1 |
| 37 | 1983 | 14–16 | 46.7% | #85 | 1,649 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |