H2H data updated: 2026-09-03 00:00 UTC

Jaime Fillol vs Cliff Richey H2H: 3-6

Cliff Richey holds a 6–3 lead over Jaime Fillol in their ATP head-to-head. Across 9 main-draw meetings, Cliff Richey leads 3–1 on carpet and 2–1 on clay. Most recently, Cliff Richey won the 1973 Atlanta Wct round of 16 6-1 5-7 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jaime Fillol
CHI Age 80 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
3 – 6
9 main draw meetings
Cliff Richey
USA Age 79 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Cliff Richey 6-1 5-7 6-2 Jaime Fillol Match data Mar 23, 1973* R16 Atlanta Wct ATP 250 Clay
Cliff Richey 3-6 7-6(5) 6-4 Jaime Fillol Match data Feb 9, 1973* R16 Philadelphia Wct ATP 250 Carpet
Cliff Richey 6-4 6-1 Jaime Fillol Match data Sep 24, 1971* R16 Los Angeles Open ATP 250 Hard
Cliff Richey 6-4 6-4 7-5 Jaime Fillol Match data Aug 14, 1971* SF Indianapolis ATP 250 Clay
Jaime Fillol 6-3 5-7 6-4 Cliff Richey Match data Jul 29, 1971* SF Tanglewood ATP 250 Hard
Jaime Fillol 6-1 4-6 6-3 Cliff Richey Match data Feb 9, 1971* SF Washington 1 ATP 250 Carpet
Cliff Richey 6-2 6-2 Jaime Fillol Match data Mar 2, 1970* SF Macon ATP 250 Carpet
Cliff Richey 3-6 6-0 6-4 Jaime Fillol Match data Jan 1, 1969* SF New Orleans 2 ATP 250 Carpet
Jaime Fillol 6-1 7-5 6-2 Cliff Richey Match data Jul 14, 1968* F Indianapolis ATP 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Jaime Fillol #794 #14 — 2,063 534 364 59.5% 0 0 0 0 8 8
Cliff Richey #662 #16 0 2,115 485 222 68.6% 0 0 0 0 21 21

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jaime Fillol Cliff Richey
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
21 — — — — — — — 1968 46–15 75.4% — 1,738 0 1
22 1968 26–9 74.3% — 1,645 0 1 1969 64–18 78.0% — 1,948 0 7
23 1969 27–19 58.7% — 1,666 0 1 1970 88–24 78.6% — 2,045 0 12
24 1970 32–23 58.2% — 1,751 0 1 1971 67–23 74.4% — 1,910 0 15
25 1971 43–21 67.2% — 1,774 0 3 1972 54–24 69.2% — 1,958 0 18
26 1972 44–32 57.9% — 1,744 0 3 1973 47–26 64.4% #19 1,848 0 18
27 1973 51–33 60.7% #17 1,872 0 4 1974 24–15 61.5% #23 1,907 0 19
28 1974 46–31 59.7% #31 1,833 0 4 1975 35–23 60.3% #32 1,857 0 19
29 1975 60–26 69.8% #16 1,975 0 5 1976 33–24 57.9% #28 1,861 0 20
30 1976 50–28 64.1% #24 1,971 0 6 1977 14–17 45.2% #87 1,720 0 20
31 1977 46–22 67.6% #24 1,901 0 6 1978 13–12 52.0% #57 1,709 0 21
32 1978 32–27 54.2% #77 1,762 0 6 1979 0–1 0.0% #662 1,697 0 21
33 1979 21–28 42.9% #124 1,736 0 6 — — — — — — —
34 1980 10–22 31.2% #86 1,644 0 6 — — — — — — —
35 1981 18–19 48.6% #95 1,657 0 7 — — — — — — —
36 1982 14–8 63.6% #77 1,708 0 8 — — — — — — —
37 1983 14–16 46.7% #85 1,651 0 8 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Jaime Fillol Cliff Richey
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1968 9 2 11 81.8% 22 7 29 75.9% 11 5 16 68.8% 4 1 5 80.0%
22 1968 — — — — 14 3 17 82.4% 10 5 15 66.7% 2 1 3 66.7% 1969 23 5 28 82.1% 27 7 34 79.4% 10 3 13 76.9% 4 3 7 57.1%
23 1969 7 5 12 58.3% 13 6 19 68.4% 7 7 14 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1970 26 7 33 78.8% 37 5 42 88.1% 10 4 14 71.4% 15 8 23 65.2%
24 1970 12 9 21 57.1% 12 5 17 70.6% 5 5 10 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 1971 26 7 33 78.8% 20 7 27 74.1% 8 3 11 72.7% 13 6 19 68.4%
25 1971 21 8 29 72.4% 10 6 16 62.5% 8 4 12 66.7% 4 3 7 57.1% 1972 22 8 30 73.3% 8 3 11 72.7% 5 1 6 83.3% 19 12 31 61.3%
26 1972 17 11 28 60.7% 13 9 22 59.1% 5 4 9 55.6% 9 8 17 52.9% 1973 9 5 14 64.3% 15 10 25 60.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 20 9 29 69.0%
27 1973 17 14 31 54.8% 25 10 35 71.4% 1 1 2 50.0% 8 8 16 50.0% 1974 16 8 24 66.7% 3 3 6 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
28 1974 11 8 19 57.9% 26 15 41 63.4% 5 3 8 62.5% 4 5 9 44.4% 1975 8 7 15 53.3% 10 8 18 55.6% 5 2 7 71.4% 12 6 18 66.7%
29 1975 9 7 16 56.3% 41 13 54 75.9% 2 2 4 50.0% 8 4 12 66.7% 1976 12 7 19 63.2% 16 6 22 72.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 10 15 33.3%
30 1976 5 3 8 62.5% 34 16 50 68.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 8 7 15 53.3% 1977 3 4 7 42.9% 3 6 9 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 8 6 14 57.1%
31 1977 4 3 7 57.1% 34 13 47 72.3% 5 2 7 71.4% 3 4 7 42.9% 1978 9 5 14 64.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 4 5 9 44.4%
32 1978 3 4 7 42.9% 21 15 36 58.3% 5 3 8 62.5% 3 5 8 37.5% 1979 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
33 1979 7 9 16 43.8% 11 10 21 52.4% 0 3 3 0.0% 3 6 9 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1980 5 10 15 33.3% 2 8 10 20.0% — — — — 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 1981 2 2 4 50.0% 16 14 30 53.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 1982 5 3 8 62.5% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — 5 1 6 83.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 1983 5 8 13 38.5% 9 6 15 60.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 130 104 234 55.6% 285 153 438 65.1% 56 45 101 55.4% 63 62 125 50.4% — 163 65 228 71.5% 161 64 225 71.6% 54 24 78 69.2% 107 69 176 60.8%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Jaime Fillol Cliff Richey
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1968 1739 120.9 — — — — +76 -1 -80 68.3% +1.05 12–4 (75%) — — +2.22
22 1968 1645 119.6 — — — — -75 +81 -43 67.7% +1.18 9–4 (69%) — — +1.11 1969 1948 136.7 — — — — +130 +23 -163 69.5% +1.45 14–3 (82%) — — +2.23
23 1969 1667 119.9 — — — — +17 +50 -33 55.4% +0.51 8–8 (50%) — — +1.81 1970 2046 149.9 — — — — +78 +58 -164 73.0% +1.54 16–7 (70%) 6–3 (67%) — -0.55
24 1970 1752 130.4 — — — — +6 +20 -71 53.1% +0.21 12–5 (71%) 4–5 (44%) — -0.35 1971 1911 147.5 — — — — +121 +58 +23 70.5% +1.44 11–13 (46%) 13–6 (68%) — +4.89
25 1971 1774 132.9 — — — — +93 -19 -22 59.9% +0.74 16–10 (62%) 4–6 (40%) — +2.68 1972 1958 154.4 — — — — +25 +29 +43 64.0% +1.09 16–12 (57%) 15–12 (56%) — -3.20
26 1972 1744 130.3 — — — — +53 +10 +38 58.2% +0.57 7–15 (32%) 15–14 (52%) — +7.01 1973 1849 146.1 — — — — +101 -3 +122 61.0% +0.95 13–11 (54%) 14–11 (56%) — -1.67
27 1973 1873 139.9 — — — — -33 +32 — 59.6% +0.60 15–12 (56%) 17–17 (50%) — -0.71 1974 1908 152.6 — — — — +81 -72 +58 59.8% +0.95 8–7 (53%) 9–8 (53%) — -3.69
28 1974 1833 145.7 — — — — -2 +31 0 56.6% +0.59 16–12 (57%) 6–12 (33%) — -4.09 1975 1858 145.3 — — — — +59 -38 +101 56.6% +0.54 14–10 (58%) 8–7 (53%) — -3.96
29 1975 1975 157.8 — — — — -83 +56 -137 63.3% +0.92 17–9 (65%) 11–10 (52%) — -5.98 1976 1861 149.1 — — — — -31 +42 — 57.8% +0.65 8–8 (50%) 8–10 (44%) — -1.58
30 1976 1972 157.9 — — — — -26 +33 -116 58.9% +0.79 22–7 (76%) 7–17 (29%) — -4.07 1977 1720 132.8 — — — — +62 +54 — 47.8% -0.14 4–5 (44%) 7–6 (54%) — +1.06
31 1977 1902 145.9 — — — — -65 +78 -56 61.2% +0.52 14–3 (82%) 11–5 (69%) — +0.66 1978 1710 129.8 — — — — +66 — — 50.0% -0.05 5–4 (56%) 4–3 (57%) — +0.66
32 1978 1763 140.0 — — — — -7 +59 +95 54.2% +0.18 11–14 (44%) 8–5 (62%) — -4.40 1979 1698 102.8 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.06
33 1979 1737 136.4 — — — — -7 +55 +28 42.4% -0.36 11–7 (61%) 5–7 (42%) — -2.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1980 1644 125.6 — — — — +4 +66 — 34.2% -1.03 7–6 (54%) 4–10 (29%) — -0.58 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 1981 1657 140.6 — — — — -45 +98 — 48.4% -0.06 6–6 (50%) 6–5 (55%) — +0.31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 1982 1709 120.8 — — — — +30 +2 — 56.1% +0.35 5–1 (83%) 6–7 (46%) — +3.91 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 1983 1651 131.3 — — — — +1 +102 — 48.1% +0.08 4–5 (44%) 3–5 (38%) — +0.24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2064 144.5 — — — — +1 +50 -25 56.2% +0.46 180–124 (59%) 107–125 (46%) 98.7 -0.50 — 2116 148.8 — — — — +70 +24 -48 64.7% +1.06 121–84 (59%) 84–66 (56%) 104.1 -0.52

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.