H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Jaime Fillol vs Cliff Richey H2H: 3-6

Cliff Richey holds a 6–3 lead over Jaime Fillol in their ATP head-to-head. Across 9 main-draw meetings, Cliff Richey leads 3–1 on carpet and 2–1 on clay. Most recently, Cliff Richey won the 1973 Atlanta Wct fourth round 6-1 5-7 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jaime Fillol
CHI Age 80 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
3 – 6
9 main draw meetings
Cliff Richey
USA Age 79 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Mar 23, 1973* Atlanta Wct ATP 250 R16 Clay Cliff Richey 6-1 5-7 6-2 Jaime Fillol Match data
Feb 10, 1973* Philadelphia Wct ATP 250 R16 Carpet Cliff Richey 3-6 7-6(5) 6-4 Jaime Fillol Match data
Sep 24, 1971* Los Angeles ATP 250 R16 Hard Cliff Richey 6-4 6-1 Jaime Fillol Match data
Aug 14, 1971* Indianapolis ATP 250 SF Clay Cliff Richey 6-4 6-4 7-5 Jaime Fillol Match data
Jul 29, 1971* Tanglewood ATP 250 SF Hard Jaime Fillol 6-3 5-7 6-4 Cliff Richey Match data
Feb 9, 1971* Washington 1 ATP 250 SF Carpet Jaime Fillol 6-1 4-6 6-3 Cliff Richey Match data
Mar 2, 1970* Macon ATP 250 SF Carpet Cliff Richey 6-2 6-2 Jaime Fillol Match data
Jan 1, 1969* New Orleans 2 ATP 250 SF Carpet Cliff Richey 3-6 6-0 6-4 Jaime Fillol Match data
Jul 14, 1968* Indianapolis ATP 250 F Clay Jaime Fillol 6-1 7-5 6-2 Cliff Richey Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Jaime Fillol #1,171 #14 8 2,041 532 367 59.2% 0 0 0 0 7 7
Cliff Richey #662 #16 0 2,112 488 224 68.5% 0 2 0 0 21 23

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jaime Fillol Cliff Richey
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
21 — — — — — — — 1968 46–15 75.4% — 1,750 0 3
22 1968 30–10 75.0% — 1,658 0 1 1969 64–18 78.0% — 1,946 0 9
23 1969 27–19 58.7% — 1,673 0 1 1970 88–24 78.6% — 2,047 0 14
24 1970 32–23 58.2% — 1,749 0 1 1971 67–23 74.4% — 1,906 0 17
25 1971 43–21 67.2% — 1,774 0 3 1972 54–24 69.2% — 1,956 0 20
26 1972 44–32 57.9% — 1,745 0 3 1973 47–26 64.4% #19 1,848 0 20
27 1973 51–33 60.7% #17 1,867 0 4 1974 25–16 61.0% #23 1,891 0 21
28 1974 48–32 60.0% #31 1,830 0 4 1975 37–24 60.7% #32 1,855 0 21
29 1975 56–27 67.5% #16 1,962 0 4 1976 33–24 57.9% #28 1,848 0 22
30 1976 47–27 63.5% #24 1,928 0 5 1977 14–17 45.2% #97 1,714 0 22
31 1977 44–21 67.7% #24 1,894 0 5 1978 13–12 52.0% #57 1,705 0 23
32 1978 33–29 53.2% #77 1,756 0 5 1979 0–1 0.0% #662 1,693 0 23
33 1979 21–28 42.9% #124 1,736 0 5 — — — — — — —
34 1980 10–22 31.2% #86 1,644 0 5 — — — — — — —
35 1981 18–19 48.6% #95 1,654 0 6 — — — — — — —
36 1982 14–8 63.6% #77 1,707 0 7 — — — — — — —
37 1983 14–16 46.7% #85 1,649 0 7 — — — — — — —