H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Jaime Fillol vs Colin Dibley H2H: 1-3
Colin Dibley holds a 3–1 lead over Jaime Fillol in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Colin Dibley leads 2–0 on carpet, while they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Colin Dibley won the 1981 Denver third round 6-1 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CHI
Age 80
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
3
4 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 81
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 5, 1981* | Denver | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Colin Dibley | 6-1 6-2 | Jaime Fillol | Match data |
| Mar 31, 1977* | Los Angeles Psw | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Colin Dibley | 6-2 6-2 | Jaime Fillol | Match data |
| Feb 20, 1975* | La Costa Wct | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Jaime Fillol | 7-6(2) 6-2 | Colin Dibley | Match data |
| Sep 3, 1971* | South Orange | ATP 250 | R64 | Hard | Colin Dibley | 6-4 6-7 6-3 | Jaime Fillol | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jaime Fillol | #1,171 | #14 | 8 | 2,041 | 532 | 367 | 59.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 7 |
| Colin Dibley | #240 | #33 | 0 | 1,875 | 338 | 310 | 52.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jaime Fillol | Colin Dibley | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 22 | 1968 | 30–10 | 75.0% | — | 1,658 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1969 | 27–19 | 58.7% | — | 1,673 | 0 | 1 | 1968 | 3–2 | 60.0% | — | 1,521 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1970 | 32–23 | 58.2% | — | 1,749 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1971 | 43–21 | 67.2% | — | 1,774 | 0 | 3 | 1970 | 7–10 | 41.2% | — | 1,528 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1972 | 44–32 | 57.9% | — | 1,745 | 0 | 3 | 1971 | 41–21 | 66.1% | — | 1,757 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1973 | 51–33 | 60.7% | #17 | 1,867 | 0 | 4 | 1972 | 52–30 | 63.4% | — | 1,818 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 1974 | 48–32 | 60.0% | #31 | 1,830 | 0 | 4 | 1973 | 35–31 | 53.0% | #39 | 1,692 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | 1975 | 56–27 | 67.5% | #16 | 1,962 | 0 | 4 | 1974 | 35–36 | 49.3% | #87 | 1,689 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | 1976 | 47–27 | 63.5% | #24 | 1,928 | 0 | 5 | 1975 | 15–28 | 34.9% | #94 | 1,606 | 0 | 4 |
| 31 | 1977 | 44–21 | 67.7% | #24 | 1,894 | 0 | 5 | 1976 | 39–39 | 50.0% | #85 | 1,655 | 0 | 4 |
| 32 | 1978 | 33–29 | 53.2% | #77 | 1,756 | 0 | 5 | 1977 | 52–33 | 61.2% | #36 | 1,778 | 0 | 4 |
| 33 | 1979 | 21–28 | 42.9% | #124 | 1,736 | 0 | 5 | 1978 | 18–28 | 39.1% | #115 | 1,628 | 0 | 4 |
| 34 | 1980 | 10–22 | 31.2% | #86 | 1,644 | 0 | 5 | 1979 | 20–22 | 47.6% | #116 | 1,698 | 0 | 4 |
| 35 | 1981 | 18–19 | 48.6% | #95 | 1,654 | 0 | 6 | 1980 | 18–23 | 43.9% | #57 | 1,648 | 0 | 5 |
| 36 | 1982 | 14–8 | 63.6% | #77 | 1,707 | 0 | 7 | 1981 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #99 | 1,630 | 0 | 5 |
| 37 | 1983 | 14–16 | 46.7% | #85 | 1,649 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |