H2H data updated: 2026-10-19 00:00 UTC

Jaime Fillol vs Dick Stockton H2H: 4-2

Jaime Fillol holds a 4–2 lead over Dick Stockton in their ATP head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Jaime Fillol leads 2–0 on carpet and 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Jaime Fillol won the 1980 Washington Open round of 32 7-5 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jaime Fillol
CHI Age 80 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
4 – 2
6 main-draw meetings
Dick Stockton
USA Age 75 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Jaime Fillol #99 7-5 6-3 Dick Stockton #88 Match data Jul 24, 1980* R32 Washington Open ATP 250 Clay
Dick Stockton #89 6-3 6-3 Jaime Fillol Match data Apr 25, 1980* R32 Las Vegas ATP 250 Hard
Jaime Fillol 4-6 6-3 6-4 Dick Stockton Match data Jul 25, 1975* R16 Washington Open ATP 250 Clay
Jaime Fillol 6-4 6-3 Dick Stockton Match data Feb 4, 1974* QF Dayton ATP 250 Carpet
Jaime Fillol 6-4 6-3 Dick Stockton Match data Feb 16, 1973* QF Toronto Wct ATP 250 Carpet
Dick Stockton 6-3 6-8 6-2 Jaime Fillol Match data Feb 12, 1969* R64 Salisbury ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Jaime Fillol #794 #14 — 2,063 531 363 59.4% 0 0 0 0 8 8
Dick Stockton #808 #8 0 2,128 385 266 59.1% 0 0 0 0 8 8

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jaime Fillol Dick Stockton
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 1968 2–4 33.3% — 1,475 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 1969 4–9 30.8% — 1,457 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 1970 7–8 46.7% — 1,550 0 0
20 — — — — — — — 1971 13–9 59.1% — 1,684 0 0
21 — — — — — — — 1972 26–20 56.5% — 1,785 0 0
22 1968 26–9 74.3% — 1,645 0 1 1973 38–24 61.3% #27 1,812 0 0
23 1969 27–19 58.7% — 1,666 0 1 1974 42–20 67.7% #15 1,909 0 2
24 1970 29–22 56.9% — 1,739 0 1 1975 39–21 65.0% #30 1,842 0 3
25 1971 43–21 67.2% — 1,773 0 3 1976 58–26 69.0% #15 1,998 0 4
26 1972 44–32 57.9% — 1,744 0 3 1977 56–23 70.9% #10 1,985 0 7
27 1973 51–33 60.7% #17 1,872 0 4 1978 46–27 63.0% #19 1,925 0 8
28 1974 46–31 59.7% #31 1,833 0 4 1979 20–21 48.8% #55 1,760 0 8
29 1975 60–26 69.8% #16 1,974 0 5 1980 11–16 40.7% #138 1,702 0 8
30 1976 50–28 64.1% #24 1,971 0 6 1981 14–15 48.3% #98 1,746 0 8
31 1977 46–22 67.6% #24 1,901 0 6 1982 8–18 30.8% #85 1,647 0 8
32 1978 32–27 54.2% #77 1,762 0 6 1983 1–2 33.3% #184 1,633 0 8
33 1979 21–28 42.9% #124 1,736 0 6 1984 0–3 0.0% #609 1,597 0 8
34 1980 10–22 31.2% #86 1,644 0 6 — — — — — — —
35 1981 18–19 48.6% #95 1,657 0 7 — — — — — — —
36 1982 14–8 63.6% #77 1,708 0 8 — — — — — — —
37 1983 14–16 46.7% #85 1,651 0 8 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Jaime Fillol Dick Stockton
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1968 — — — — — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1969 1 2 3 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1970 3 3 6 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1971 8 5 13 61.5% 2 1 3 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1972 9 6 15 60.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 5 7 12 41.7%
22 1968 — — — — 14 3 17 82.4% 10 5 15 66.7% 2 1 3 66.7% 1973 7 6 13 53.8% 10 6 16 62.5% 4 4 8 50.0% 17 8 25 68.0%
23 1969 7 5 12 58.3% 13 6 19 68.4% 7 7 14 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1974 13 10 23 56.5% 16 3 19 84.2% 8 3 11 72.7% 5 4 9 55.6%
24 1970 12 9 21 57.1% 9 4 13 69.2% 5 5 10 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 1975 13 5 18 72.2% 8 6 14 57.1% — — — — 18 10 28 64.3%
25 1971 21 8 29 72.4% 10 6 16 62.5% 8 4 12 66.7% 4 3 7 57.1% 1976 8 6 14 57.1% 27 9 36 75.0% 8 3 11 72.7% 15 8 23 65.2%
26 1972 17 11 28 60.7% 13 9 22 59.1% 5 4 9 55.6% 9 8 17 52.9% 1977 5 5 10 50.0% 13 5 18 72.2% 13 5 18 72.2% 25 8 33 75.8%
27 1973 17 14 31 54.8% 25 10 35 71.4% 1 1 2 50.0% 8 8 16 50.0% 1978 8 6 14 57.1% 12 6 18 66.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 26 13 39 66.7%
28 1974 11 8 19 57.9% 26 15 41 63.4% 5 3 8 62.5% 4 5 9 44.4% 1979 6 5 11 54.5% 3 4 7 42.9% 3 3 6 50.0% 8 9 17 47.1%
29 1975 9 7 16 56.3% 41 13 54 75.9% 2 2 4 50.0% 8 4 12 66.7% 1980 1 6 7 14.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 7 3 10 70.0% 2 5 7 28.6%
30 1976 5 3 8 62.5% 34 16 50 68.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 8 7 15 53.3% 1981 6 7 13 46.2% 5 3 8 62.5% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
31 1977 4 3 7 57.1% 34 13 47 72.3% 5 2 7 71.4% 3 4 7 42.9% 1982 0 6 6 0.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 3 5 8 37.5%
32 1978 3 4 7 42.9% 21 15 36 58.3% 5 3 8 62.5% 3 5 8 37.5% 1983 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1979 7 9 16 43.8% 11 10 21 52.4% 0 3 3 0.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 1984 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
34 1980 5 10 15 33.3% 2 8 10 20.0% — — — — 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 1981 2 2 4 50.0% 16 14 30 53.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 1982 5 3 8 62.5% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — 5 1 6 83.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 1983 5 8 13 38.5% 9 6 15 60.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 130 104 234 55.6% 282 152 434 65.0% 56 45 101 55.4% 63 62 125 50.4% — 89 82 171 52.0% 112 59 171 65.5% 56 42 98 57.1% 128 83 211 60.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Jaime Fillol Dick Stockton
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1968 1476 95.8 — — — — — — +22 36.8% -0.63 — — — +0.27
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1969 1457 106.9 — — — — +64 +76 +9 32.3% -0.81 2–2 (50%) — — 0.00
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1970 1550 119.1 — — — — +32 +27 -92 47.2% +0.03 2–2 (50%) 1–2 (33%) — -0.09
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1971 1685 122.8 — — — — +11 -78 — 55.0% +0.53 6–3 (67%) 10–8 (56%) 106.4 +0.96
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1972 1785 124.7 — — — — +6 -146 -131 53.0% +0.32 11–5 (69%) 9–13 (41%) 102.0 +2.19
22 1968 1645 119.6 — — — — -75 +81 -43 67.7% +1.18 9–4 (69%) — — +1.11 1973 1813 139.8 — — — — -28 -41 -156 58.9% +0.53 9–11 (45%) 17–10 (63%) 103.5 +0.72
23 1969 1667 119.9 — — — — +17 +50 -33 55.4% +0.51 8–8 (50%) — — +1.81 1974 1909 143.4 — — — — -125 +17 -99 62.9% +0.95 14–11 (56%) 11–13 (46%) 100.8 -0.92
24 1970 1740 128.7 — — — — +17 +9 -60 51.5% +0.13 12–4 (75%) 4–5 (44%) 105.1 0.00 1975 1842 148.8 — — — — +38 +40 — 60.7% +0.74 14–9 (61%) 13–9 (59%) 104.1 -1.04
25 1971 1773 132.8 — — — — +94 -30 -21 59.9% +0.74 16–10 (62%) 4–6 (40%) 101.2 +2.69 1976 1999 161.0 — — — — -36 -1 -73 67.0% +1.09 12–12 (50%) 18–7 (72%) 104.3 -5.32
26 1972 1744 130.4 — — — — +51 +6 +38 58.2% +0.57 7–15 (32%) 15–14 (52%) 93.4 +6.96 1977 1986 161.9 — — — — +77 +11 -45 64.7% +0.89 16–12 (57%) 16–12 (57%) 99.3 -4.39
27 1973 1872 139.8 — — — — -32 +33 — 59.6% +0.60 15–12 (56%) 17–17 (50%) 101.4 -0.69 1978 1926 157.1 — — — — +53 +59 — 62.1% +0.84 12–15 (44%) 14–8 (64%) 91.1 -1.12
28 1974 1833 145.7 — — — — -3 +31 0 56.6% +0.59 16–12 (57%) 6–12 (33%) 95.2 -4.10 1979 1761 144.2 — — — — +102 +144 +80 48.5% -0.12 6–5 (55%) 11–7 (61%) 101.4 -1.76
29 1975 1975 157.7 — — — — -83 +57 -137 63.3% +0.92 17–9 (65%) 11–10 (52%) 105.2 -5.97 1980 1702 136.8 — — — — +7 +154 +200 42.6% -0.24 4–6 (40%) 5–12 (29%) 94.9 -1.63
30 1976 1972 157.9 — — — — -27 +33 -116 58.9% +0.79 22–7 (76%) 7–17 (29%) 99.3 -4.08 1981 1746 143.6 — — — — 0 +94 +97 50.7% +0.21 2–6 (25%) 6–6 (50%) 93.8 -1.08
31 1977 1901 145.9 — — — — -64 +78 -55 61.2% +0.52 14–3 (82%) 11–5 (69%) 111.7 +0.66 1982 1647 136.4 — — — — +16 +132 +143 33.9% -1.06 3–6 (33%) 3–7 (30%) 93.1 -2.04
32 1978 1762 140.0 — — — — -7 +60 +96 54.2% +0.18 11–14 (44%) 8–5 (62%) 92.6 -4.40 1983 1634 106.4 — — — — -4 — — 28.6% -0.29 — 0–3 (0%) — -0.22
33 1979 1737 136.4 — — — — -7 +55 +28 42.4% -0.36 11–7 (61%) 5–7 (42%) 102.8 -2.01 1984 1597 101.7 — — — — — — — 25.0% -2.00 0–1 — — -0.44
34 1980 1644 125.6 — — — — +4 +66 — 34.2% -1.03 7–6 (54%) 4–10 (29%) 97.9 -0.58 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 1981 1657 140.6 — — — — -45 +97 — 48.4% -0.06 6–6 (50%) 6–5 (55%) 100.4 +0.31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 1982 1709 120.7 — — — — +30 +1 — 56.1% +0.35 5–1 (83%) 6–7 (46%) 102.5 +3.91 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 1983 1651 131.3 — — — — 0 +102 — 48.1% +0.08 4–5 (44%) 3–5 (38%) 95.2 +0.24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2064 144.4 — — — — +2 +49 -24 56.2% +0.45 180–123 (59%) 107–125 (46%) 99.0 -0.47 — 2128 151.9 — — — — +14 +21 -21 57.0% +0.51 113–106 (52%) 134–117 (53%) 98.8 -2.48

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.