Jaime Fillol
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raymond Moore | 9 | 7 | 16 | Oct 3, 1981 | H2H |
| Guillermo Vilas | 2 | 13 | 15 | Apr 10, 1981 | H2H |
| Stan Smith | 3 | 12 | 15 | Jun 11, 1977 | H2H |
| Manuel Orantes | 5 | 9 | 14 | Jan 29, 1982 | H2H |
| Andrew Pattison | 7 | 6 | 13 | Jul 9, 1981 | — |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC
Jaime Fillol holds a 3–2 lead over Francisco Gonzalez in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Francisco Gonzalez leads 2–1 on hard courts, while Jaime Fillol leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Francisco Gonzalez won the 1983 Caracas round of 16 2-6 7-6 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Francisco Gonzalez | 2-6 7-6 6-3 | Jaime Fillol | Match data | Feb 4, 1983* | R16 | Caracas | ATP 250 | Hard |
| Jaime Fillol | 6-2 6-3 | Francisco Gonzalez | Match data | Nov 19, 1981* | R32 | Argentina Open | ATP 250 | Clay |
| Francisco Gonzalez | 6-4 3-6 6-1 | Jaime Fillol | Match data | Aug 23, 1979* | R32 | Cincinnati Open | ATP 500 | Hard |
| Jaime Fillol | 6-4 6-1 | Francisco Gonzalez | Match data | Apr 13, 1979* | R16 | Tulsa | ATP 250 | Hard |
| Jaime Fillol | 6-2 6-0 | Francisco Gonzalez | Match data | Oct 20, 1977* | R32 | Barcelona Open | ATP 250 | Clay |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jaime Fillol | #794 | #14 | — | 2,063 | 534 | 364 | 59.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 8 |
| Francisco Gonzalez | #997 | #40 | 0 | 1,758 | 105 | 157 | 40.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jaime Fillol | Francisco Gonzalez | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1975 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #308 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1976 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #272 | 1,455 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #281 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1968 | 26–9 | 74.3% | — | 1,645 | 0 | 1 | 1978 | 8–10 | 44.4% | #61 | 1,602 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1969 | 27–19 | 58.7% | — | 1,666 | 0 | 1 | 1979 | 21–26 | 44.7% | #77 | 1,649 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1970 | 32–23 | 58.2% | — | 1,751 | 0 | 1 | 1980 | 12–20 | 37.5% | #74 | 1,704 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1971 | 43–21 | 67.2% | — | 1,774 | 0 | 3 | 1981 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #98 | 1,659 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1972 | 44–32 | 57.9% | — | 1,744 | 0 | 3 | 1982 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #100 | 1,685 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1973 | 51–33 | 60.7% | #17 | 1,872 | 0 | 4 | 1983 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #99 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1974 | 46–31 | 59.7% | #31 | 1,833 | 0 | 4 | 1984 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #82 | 1,654 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1975 | 60–26 | 69.8% | #16 | 1,975 | 0 | 5 | 1985 | 9–17 | 34.6% | #140 | 1,533 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 1976 | 50–28 | 64.1% | #24 | 1,971 | 0 | 6 | 1986 | 0–6 | 0.0% | #548 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 1977 | 46–22 | 67.6% | #24 | 1,901 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1978 | 32–27 | 54.2% | #77 | 1,762 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1979 | 21–28 | 42.9% | #124 | 1,736 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 1980 | 10–22 | 31.2% | #86 | 1,644 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 1981 | 18–19 | 48.6% | #95 | 1,657 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 1982 | 14–8 | 63.6% | #77 | 1,708 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 1983 | 14–16 | 46.7% | #85 | 1,651 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Jaime Fillol | Francisco Gonzalez | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1975 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1976 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1968 | — | — | — | — | 14 | 3 | 17 | 82.4% | 10 | 5 | 15 | 66.7% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 1978 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 8 | 7 | 15 | 53.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1969 | 7 | 5 | 12 | 58.3% | 13 | 6 | 19 | 68.4% | 7 | 7 | 14 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1979 | 10 | 10 | 20 | 50.0% | 6 | 7 | 13 | 46.2% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% |
| 24 | 1970 | 12 | 9 | 21 | 57.1% | 12 | 5 | 17 | 70.6% | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 1980 | 11 | 9 | 20 | 55.0% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% |
| 25 | 1971 | 21 | 8 | 29 | 72.4% | 10 | 6 | 16 | 62.5% | 8 | 4 | 12 | 66.7% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 1981 | 5 | 6 | 11 | 45.5% | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% |
| 26 | 1972 | 17 | 11 | 28 | 60.7% | 13 | 9 | 22 | 59.1% | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% | 9 | 8 | 17 | 52.9% | 1982 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 5 | 7 | 12 | 41.7% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% |
| 27 | 1973 | 17 | 14 | 31 | 54.8% | 25 | 10 | 35 | 71.4% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 8 | 8 | 16 | 50.0% | 1983 | 9 | 10 | 19 | 47.4% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% |
| 28 | 1974 | 11 | 8 | 19 | 57.9% | 26 | 15 | 41 | 63.4% | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | 1984 | 5 | 7 | 12 | 41.7% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% |
| 29 | 1975 | 9 | 7 | 16 | 56.3% | 41 | 13 | 54 | 75.9% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 8 | 4 | 12 | 66.7% | 1985 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 4 | 7 | 11 | 36.4% | 5 | 6 | 11 | 45.5% |
| 30 | 1976 | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | 34 | 16 | 50 | 68.0% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 8 | 7 | 15 | 53.3% | 1986 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 31 | 1977 | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 34 | 13 | 47 | 72.3% | 5 | 2 | 7 | 71.4% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1978 | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 21 | 15 | 36 | 58.3% | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1979 | 7 | 9 | 16 | 43.8% | 11 | 10 | 21 | 52.4% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 3 | 6 | 9 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 1980 | 5 | 10 | 15 | 33.3% | 2 | 8 | 10 | 20.0% | — | — | — | — | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 1981 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 16 | 14 | 30 | 53.3% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 1982 | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 5 | 1 | 6 | 83.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 1983 | 5 | 8 | 13 | 38.5% | 9 | 6 | 15 | 60.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 130 | 104 | 234 | 55.6% | 285 | 153 | 438 | 65.1% | 56 | 45 | 101 | 55.4% | 63 | 62 | 125 | 50.4% | — | 44 | 62 | 106 | 41.5% | 26 | 43 | 69 | 37.7% | 16 | 24 | 40 | 40.0% | 19 | 28 | 47 | 40.4% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Jaime Fillol | Francisco Gonzalez | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1975 | 1487 | 102.1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 20.0% | -1.40 | 0–1 | 0–2 | — | -0.09 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1976 | 1455 | 101.2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 25.0% | -1.88 | 0–2 | 0–1 | — | +0.16 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 1500 | 113.8 | — | — | — | — | +54 | +17 | — | 39.1% | -1.61 | 2–1 (67%) | 3–2 (60%) | — | +0.31 |
| 22 | 1968 | 1645 | 119.6 | — | — | — | — | -75 | +81 | -43 | 67.7% | +1.18 | 9–4 (69%) | — | — | +1.11 | 1978 | 1602 | 128.6 | — | — | — | — | -59 | +21 | — | 41.0% | -0.90 | 3–2 (60%) | 4–1 (80%) | — | -1.22 |
| 23 | 1969 | 1667 | 119.9 | — | — | — | — | +17 | +50 | -33 | 55.4% | +0.51 | 8–8 (50%) | — | — | +1.81 | 1979 | 1650 | 132.9 | — | — | — | — | +20 | -50 | -143 | 44.3% | -0.28 | 7–6 (54%) | 6–10 (38%) | — | +0.49 |
| 24 | 1970 | 1752 | 130.4 | — | — | — | — | +6 | +20 | -71 | 53.1% | +0.21 | 12–5 (71%) | 4–5 (44%) | — | -0.35 | 1980 | 1704 | 136.2 | — | — | — | — | +18 | -124 | -228 | 40.5% | -0.65 | 4–4 (50%) | 7–7 (50%) | — | -2.51 |
| 25 | 1971 | 1774 | 132.9 | — | — | — | — | +93 | -19 | -22 | 59.9% | +0.74 | 16–10 (62%) | 4–6 (40%) | — | +2.68 | 1981 | 1659 | 126.6 | — | — | — | — | +2 | -100 | -75 | 48.6% | -0.11 | 2–4 (33%) | 5–2 (71%) | — | +0.46 |
| 26 | 1972 | 1744 | 130.3 | — | — | — | — | +53 | +10 | +38 | 58.2% | +0.57 | 7–15 (32%) | 15–14 (52%) | — | +7.01 | 1982 | 1686 | 129.7 | — | — | — | — | -33 | -103 | -85 | 46.4% | -0.12 | 3–7 (30%) | 11–12 (48%) | — | +0.29 |
| 27 | 1973 | 1873 | 139.9 | — | — | — | — | -33 | +32 | — | 59.6% | +0.60 | 15–12 (56%) | 17–17 (50%) | — | -0.71 | 1983 | 1624 | 126.5 | — | — | — | — | +5 | -83 | — | 37.7% | -0.84 | 4–0 (100%) | 6–7 (46%) | — | +0.17 |
| 28 | 1974 | 1833 | 145.7 | — | — | — | — | -2 | +31 | 0 | 56.6% | +0.59 | 16–12 (57%) | 6–12 (33%) | — | -4.09 | 1984 | 1655 | 132.0 | — | — | — | — | -20 | -90 | +1 | 46.9% | -0.02 | 4–6 (40%) | 5–6 (45%) | — | +1.36 |
| 29 | 1975 | 1975 | 157.8 | — | — | — | — | -83 | +56 | -137 | 63.3% | +0.92 | 17–9 (65%) | 11–10 (52%) | — | -5.98 | 1985 | 1533 | 120.3 | — | — | — | — | +42 | — | +57 | 39.1% | -0.35 | 5–5 (50%) | 5–7 (42%) | — | +1.77 |
| 30 | 1976 | 1972 | 157.9 | — | — | — | — | -26 | +33 | -116 | 58.9% | +0.79 | 22–7 (76%) | 7–17 (29%) | — | -4.07 | 1986 | 1470 | 107.8 | — | — | — | — | +29 | — | — | 13.3% | -2.07 | 0–2 | 1–3 (25%) | — | +0.28 |
| 31 | 1977 | 1902 | 145.9 | — | — | — | — | -65 | +78 | -56 | 61.2% | +0.52 | 14–3 (82%) | 11–5 (69%) | — | +0.66 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1978 | 1763 | 140.0 | — | — | — | — | -7 | +59 | +95 | 54.2% | +0.18 | 11–14 (44%) | 8–5 (62%) | — | -4.40 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1979 | 1737 | 136.4 | — | — | — | — | -7 | +55 | +28 | 42.4% | -0.36 | 11–7 (61%) | 5–7 (42%) | — | -2.01 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 1980 | 1644 | 125.6 | — | — | — | — | +4 | +66 | — | 34.2% | -1.03 | 7–6 (54%) | 4–10 (29%) | — | -0.58 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 1981 | 1657 | 140.6 | — | — | — | — | -45 | +98 | — | 48.4% | -0.06 | 6–6 (50%) | 6–5 (55%) | — | +0.31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 1982 | 1709 | 120.8 | — | — | — | — | +30 | +2 | — | 56.1% | +0.35 | 5–1 (83%) | 6–7 (46%) | — | +3.91 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 1983 | 1651 | 131.3 | — | — | — | — | +1 | +102 | — | 48.1% | +0.08 | 4–5 (44%) | 3–5 (38%) | — | +0.24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 2064 | 144.5 | — | — | — | — | +1 | +50 | -25 | 56.2% | +0.46 | 180–124 (59%) | 107–125 (46%) | 98.7 | -0.50 | — | 1759 | 134.8 | — | — | — | — | +8 | -53 | -47 | 42.2% | -0.47 | 34–40 (46%) | 53–60 (47%) | 102.8 | +0.56 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raymond Moore | 9 | 7 | 16 | Oct 3, 1981 | H2H |
| Guillermo Vilas | 2 | 13 | 15 | Apr 10, 1981 | H2H |
| Stan Smith | 3 | 12 | 15 | Jun 11, 1977 | H2H |
| Manuel Orantes | 5 | 9 | 14 | Jan 29, 1982 | H2H |
| Andrew Pattison | 7 | 6 | 13 | Jul 9, 1981 | — |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wojtek Fibak | 0 | 5 | 5 | Feb 22, 1985 | H2H |
| Tim Gullikson | 1 | 4 | 5 | Feb 5, 1985 | — |
| Jaime Fillol | 2 | 3 | 5 | Feb 4, 1983 | H2H |
| Harold Solomon | 0 | 5 | 5 | Feb 25, 1981 | H2H |
| Kevin Curren | 1 | 3 | 4 | Nov 20, 1986 | H2H |