H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Jaime Fillol vs Gene Mayer H2H: 2-1
Jaime Fillol holds a 2–1 lead over Gene Mayer in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Jaime Fillol leads 2–0 on clay, while Gene Mayer leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Gene Mayer won the 1982 Monterrey third round 6-2 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CHI
Age 80
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
USA
Age 70
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 25, 1982* | Monterrey | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Gene Mayer | 6-2 6-2 | Jaime Fillol | Match data |
| Aug 6, 1979 | Indianapolis | ATP 250 | R64 | Clay | Jaime Fillol | 1-6 6-2 6-3 | Gene Mayer | Match data |
| Aug 7, 1975* | Louisville | ATP 250 | R64 | Clay | Jaime Fillol | 6-1 6-2 | Gene Mayer | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jaime Fillol | #1,171 | #14 | 8 | 2,041 | 532 | 367 | 59.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 7 |
| Gene Mayer | #976 | #4 | 6 | 2,198 | 311 | 159 | 66.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 14 | 14 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jaime Fillol | Gene Mayer | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1973 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1975 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #144 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1976 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #48 | 1,700 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 17–27 | 38.6% | #142 | 1,685 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1968 | 30–10 | 75.0% | — | 1,658 | 0 | 1 | 1978 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #64 | 1,733 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1969 | 27–19 | 58.7% | — | 1,673 | 0 | 1 | 1979 | 54–25 | 68.4% | #12 | 1,979 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1970 | 32–23 | 58.2% | — | 1,749 | 0 | 1 | 1980 | 71–16 | 81.6% | #5 | 2,139 | 0 | 7 |
| 25 | 1971 | 43–21 | 67.2% | — | 1,774 | 0 | 3 | 1981 | 37–8 | 82.2% | #7 | 2,072 | 0 | 11 |
| 26 | 1972 | 44–32 | 57.9% | — | 1,745 | 0 | 3 | 1982 | 33–11 | 75.0% | #7 | 2,069 | 0 | 12 |
| 27 | 1973 | 51–33 | 60.7% | #17 | 1,867 | 0 | 4 | 1983 | 25–10 | 71.4% | #10 | 1,964 | 0 | 14 |
| 28 | 1974 | 48–32 | 60.0% | #31 | 1,830 | 0 | 4 | 1984 | 24–15 | 61.5% | #18 | 1,873 | 0 | 14 |
| 29 | 1975 | 56–27 | 67.5% | #16 | 1,962 | 0 | 4 | 1985 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #368 | 1,863 | 0 | 14 |
| 30 | 1976 | 47–27 | 63.5% | #24 | 1,928 | 0 | 5 | 1986 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #870 | 1,841 | 0 | 14 |
| 31 | 1977 | 44–21 | 67.7% | #24 | 1,894 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1978 | 33–29 | 53.2% | #77 | 1,756 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1979 | 21–28 | 42.9% | #124 | 1,736 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 1980 | 10–22 | 31.2% | #86 | 1,644 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 1981 | 18–19 | 48.6% | #95 | 1,654 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 1982 | 14–8 | 63.6% | #77 | 1,707 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 1983 | 14–16 | 46.7% | #85 | 1,649 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |