H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Jaime Fillol vs Georges Goven H2H: 2-2
Jaime Fillol and Georges Goven are tied 2–2 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on carpet, while they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Jaime Fillol won the 1982 US Open first round 6-2 6-4 1-6 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CHI
Age 80
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
2
–
2
4 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 78
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 2, 1982* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Jaime Fillol | 6-2 6-4 1-6 6-3 | Georges Goven | Match data |
| Mar 9, 1972* | Washington | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Jaime Fillol | 7-6 6-1 | Georges Goven | Match data |
| Feb 6, 1972* | Omaha | ATP 250 | QF | Hard | Georges Goven | 6-4 2-6 7-6 | Jaime Fillol | Match data |
| Nov 23, 1971* | London 3 | ATP 250 | QF | Carpet | Georges Goven | 6-1 7-5 | Jaime Fillol | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jaime Fillol | #1,171 | #14 | 8 | 2,041 | 532 | 367 | 59.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 7 |
| Georges Goven | #783 | #56 | 0 | 1,871 | 203 | 230 | 46.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jaime Fillol | Georges Goven | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1968 | 12–6 | 66.7% | — | 1,580 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1969 | 15–13 | 53.6% | — | 1,652 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1968 | 30–10 | 75.0% | — | 1,658 | 0 | 1 | 1970 | 30–15 | 66.7% | — | 1,835 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1969 | 27–19 | 58.7% | — | 1,673 | 0 | 1 | 1971 | 36–21 | 63.2% | — | 1,822 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1970 | 32–23 | 58.2% | — | 1,749 | 0 | 1 | 1972 | 16–24 | 40.0% | — | 1,594 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1971 | 43–21 | 67.2% | — | 1,774 | 0 | 3 | 1973 | 27–28 | 49.1% | #67 | 1,601 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1972 | 44–32 | 57.9% | — | 1,745 | 0 | 3 | 1974 | 17–23 | 42.5% | #83 | 1,665 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1973 | 51–33 | 60.7% | #17 | 1,867 | 0 | 4 | 1975 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #82 | 1,673 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 1974 | 48–32 | 60.0% | #31 | 1,830 | 0 | 4 | 1976 | 3–12 | 20.0% | #163 | 1,557 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 1975 | 56–27 | 67.5% | #16 | 1,962 | 0 | 4 | 1977 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #78 | 1,548 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 1976 | 47–27 | 63.5% | #24 | 1,928 | 0 | 5 | 1978 | 6–15 | 28.6% | #129 | 1,567 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 1977 | 44–21 | 67.7% | #24 | 1,894 | 0 | 5 | 1979 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #203 | 1,543 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | 1978 | 33–29 | 53.2% | #77 | 1,756 | 0 | 5 | 1980 | 1–8 | 11.1% | #151 | 1,493 | 0 | 1 |
| 33 | 1979 | 21–28 | 42.9% | #124 | 1,736 | 0 | 5 | 1981 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #151 | 1,470 | 0 | 1 |
| 34 | 1980 | 10–22 | 31.2% | #86 | 1,644 | 0 | 5 | 1982 | 6–16 | 27.3% | #119 | 1,445 | 0 | 1 |
| 35 | 1981 | 18–19 | 48.6% | #95 | 1,654 | 0 | 6 | 1983 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #252 | 1,536 | 0 | 1 |
| 36 | 1982 | 14–8 | 63.6% | #77 | 1,707 | 0 | 7 | 1984 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #295 | 1,495 | 0 | 1 |
| 37 | 1983 | 14–16 | 46.7% | #85 | 1,649 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |