H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Jaime Fillol vs Jan Kodes H2H: 5-4

Jaime Fillol holds a 5–4 lead over Jan Kodes in their ATP head-to-head. Across 9 main-draw meetings, Jan Kodes leads 3–2 on clay, while Jaime Fillol leads 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Jaime Fillol won the 1978 Madrid round of 16 6-4 2-6 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jaime Fillol
CHI Age 80 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
5 – 4
9 main draw meetings
Jan Kodes
CZE Age 80 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Jaime Fillol 6-4 2-6 6-3 Jan Kodes Match data Oct 12, 1978* R16 Madrid ATP 250 Clay
Jaime Fillol #24 6-2 6-1 2-0 (ret.) Jan Kodes #65 Match data Jun 28, 1978* R128 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass
Jan Kodes 5-7 2-6 7-6 6-2 6-3 Jaime Fillol Match data Oct 17, 1975* SF Madrid ATP 250 Clay
Jaime Fillol #23 6-4 1-6 6-0 7-5 Jan Kodes #24 Match data Mar 16, 1975* F Dusseldorf ATP 250 Clay
Jan Kodes 6-1 6-2 Jaime Fillol Match data Oct 27, 1972* R16 Barcelona Open ATP 250 Clay
Jan Kodes 2-6 6-3 6-2 Jaime Fillol Match data Sep 20, 1971 R16 Sacramento ATP 250 Hard
Jaime Fillol 6-3 7-5 Jan Kodes Match data Feb 24, 1971* R32 Salisbury ATP 250 Hard
Jan Kodes 4-6 8-6 7-5 6-4 Jaime Fillol Match data Nov 15, 1969* R16 Argentina Open ATP 250 Clay
Jaime Fillol 3-6 6-4 6-3 Jan Kodes Match data Apr 5, 1969* QF San Juan ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Jaime Fillol #794 #14 — 2,063 534 364 59.5% 0 0 0 0 8 8
Jan Kodes #1,109 #5 14 2,122 471 276 63.1% 3 0 0 0 7 10

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jaime Fillol Jan Kodes
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
22 1968 26–9 74.3% — 1,645 0 1 1968 23–18 56.1% — 1,605 0 0
23 1969 27–19 58.7% — 1,666 0 1 1969 32–19 62.7% — 1,738 0 1
24 1970 32–23 58.2% — 1,751 0 1 1970 58–31 65.2% — 1,820 1 3
25 1971 43–21 67.2% — 1,774 0 3 1971 49–23 68.1% — 1,977 2 5
26 1972 44–32 57.9% — 1,744 0 3 1972 44–15 74.6% — 1,941 2 6
27 1973 51–33 60.7% #17 1,872 0 4 1973 51–20 71.8% #9 1,936 3 8
28 1974 46–31 59.7% #31 1,833 0 4 1974 45–23 66.2% #17 1,922 3 8
29 1975 60–26 69.8% #16 1,975 0 5 1975 55–21 72.4% #19 1,985 3 9
30 1976 50–28 64.1% #24 1,971 0 6 1976 49–21 70.0% #19 1,986 3 10
31 1977 46–22 67.6% #24 1,901 0 6 1977 30–25 54.5% #41 1,854 3 10
32 1978 32–27 54.2% #77 1,762 0 6 1978 13–18 41.9% #119 1,757 3 10
33 1979 21–28 42.9% #124 1,736 0 6 1979 16–16 50.0% #88 1,704 3 10
34 1980 10–22 31.2% #86 1,644 0 6 1980 5–13 27.8% #221 1,583 3 10
35 1981 18–19 48.6% #95 1,657 0 7 1981 1–7 12.5% — 1,510 3 10
36 1982 14–8 63.6% #77 1,708 0 8 1982 0–5 0.0% — 1,466 3 10
37 1983 14–16 46.7% #85 1,651 0 8 1983 0–1 0.0% #504 1,449 3 10

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Jaime Fillol Jan Kodes
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
22 1968 — — — — 14 3 17 82.4% 10 5 15 66.7% 2 1 3 66.7% 1968 10 6 16 62.5% 13 8 21 61.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0%
23 1969 7 5 12 58.3% 13 6 19 68.4% 7 7 14 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1969 7 5 12 58.3% 20 9 29 69.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
24 1970 12 9 21 57.1% 12 5 17 70.6% 5 5 10 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 1970 16 12 28 57.1% 42 11 53 79.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 7 7 0.0%
25 1971 21 8 29 72.4% 10 6 16 62.5% 8 4 12 66.7% 4 3 7 57.1% 1971 15 9 24 62.5% 25 6 31 80.6% 6 4 10 60.0% 3 4 7 42.9%
26 1972 17 11 28 60.7% 13 9 22 59.1% 5 4 9 55.6% 9 8 17 52.9% 1972 5 3 8 62.5% 31 7 38 81.6% 6 2 8 75.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
27 1973 17 14 31 54.8% 25 10 35 71.4% 1 1 2 50.0% 8 8 16 50.0% 1973 0 3 3 0.0% 19 7 26 73.1% 16 2 18 88.9% 16 8 24 66.7%
28 1974 11 8 19 57.9% 26 15 41 63.4% 5 3 8 62.5% 4 5 9 44.4% 1974 7 4 11 63.6% 16 9 25 64.0% 10 3 13 76.9% 12 7 19 63.2%
29 1975 9 7 16 56.3% 41 13 54 75.9% 2 2 4 50.0% 8 4 12 66.7% 1975 1 2 3 33.3% 35 10 45 77.8% 2 2 4 50.0% 17 7 24 70.8%
30 1976 5 3 8 62.5% 34 16 50 68.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 8 7 15 53.3% 1976 — — — — 38 13 51 74.5% — — — — 11 8 19 57.9%
31 1977 4 3 7 57.1% 34 13 47 72.3% 5 2 7 71.4% 3 4 7 42.9% 1977 7 8 15 46.7% 19 10 29 65.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 6 10 40.0%
32 1978 3 4 7 42.9% 21 15 36 58.3% 5 3 8 62.5% 3 5 8 37.5% 1978 3 3 6 50.0% 8 10 18 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3%
33 1979 7 9 16 43.8% 11 10 21 52.4% 0 3 3 0.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 1979 6 6 12 50.0% 10 9 19 52.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
34 1980 5 10 15 33.3% 2 8 10 20.0% — — — — 3 4 7 42.9% 1980 0 3 3 0.0% 4 7 11 36.4% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
35 1981 2 2 4 50.0% 16 14 30 53.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1981 0 1 1 0.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
36 1982 5 3 8 62.5% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — 5 1 6 83.3% 1982 — — — — 0 5 5 0.0% — — — — — — — —
37 1983 5 8 13 38.5% 9 6 15 60.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1983 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
Career — 130 104 234 55.6% 285 153 438 65.1% 56 45 101 55.4% 63 62 125 50.4% — 77 65 142 54.2% 281 127 408 68.9% 43 22 65 66.2% 70 62 132 53.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Jaime Fillol Jan Kodes
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
22 1968 1645 119.6 — — — — -75 +81 -43 67.7% +1.18 9–4 (69%) — — +1.11 1968 1605 118.0 — — — — -36 +42 — 56.1% +0.68 5–9 (36%) — — -0.12
23 1969 1667 119.9 — — — — +17 +50 -33 55.4% +0.51 8–8 (50%) — — +1.81 1969 1738 130.3 — — — — -81 +93 -208 60.3% +0.76 10–9 (53%) — — +2.03
24 1970 1752 130.4 — — — — +6 +20 -71 53.1% +0.21 12–5 (71%) 4–5 (44%) — -0.35 1970 1820 143.1 — — — — -122 +159 — 63.2% +1.07 11–11 (50%) 3–0 (100%) — +2.16
25 1971 1774 132.9 — — — — +93 -19 -22 59.9% +0.74 16–10 (62%) 4–6 (40%) — +2.68 1971 1978 151.3 — — — — -117 +115 -220 62.9% +0.93 16–9 (64%) 7–2 (78%) — -1.49
26 1972 1744 130.3 — — — — +53 +10 +38 58.2% +0.57 7–15 (32%) 15–14 (52%) — +7.01 1972 1942 149.8 — — — — -111 +207 -133 68.5% +1.30 8–5 (62%) 7–3 (70%) — +0.38
27 1973 1873 139.9 — — — — -33 +32 — 59.6% +0.60 15–12 (56%) 17–17 (50%) — -0.71 1973 1937 151.7 — — — — -54 +97 +95 65.5% +1.02 14–8 (64%) 4–7 (36%) — -0.84
28 1974 1833 145.7 — — — — -2 +31 0 56.6% +0.59 16–12 (57%) 6–12 (33%) — -4.09 1974 1923 150.6 — — — — +12 +34 +136 63.7% +0.97 10–9 (53%) 8–7 (53%) — -2.48
29 1975 1975 157.8 — — — — -83 +56 -137 63.3% +0.92 17–9 (65%) 11–10 (52%) — -5.98 1975 1986 152.7 — — — — -43 +124 -4 65.8% +1.06 14–8 (64%) 8–6 (57%) — +1.04
30 1976 1972 157.9 — — — — -26 +33 -116 58.9% +0.79 22–7 (76%) 7–17 (29%) — -4.07 1976 1986 154.1 — — — — -46 +46 — 64.5% +1.06 11–6 (65%) 8–12 (40%) — +1.98
31 1977 1902 145.9 — — — — -65 +78 -56 61.2% +0.52 14–3 (82%) 11–5 (69%) — +0.66 1977 1855 150.0 — — — — -30 +83 — 55.2% +0.36 9–10 (47%) 8–3 (73%) — -2.80
32 1978 1763 140.0 — — — — -7 +59 +95 54.2% +0.18 11–14 (44%) 8–5 (62%) — -4.40 1978 1757 139.9 — — — — +40 +72 — 43.8% -0.40 5–5 (50%) 3–4 (43%) — -2.06
33 1979 1737 136.4 — — — — -7 +55 +28 42.4% -0.36 11–7 (61%) 5–7 (42%) — -2.01 1979 1704 135.5 — — — — +72 +67 — 47.7% -0.22 8–6 (57%) 7–7 (50%) — +0.10
34 1980 1644 125.6 — — — — +4 +66 — 34.2% -1.03 7–6 (54%) 4–10 (29%) — -0.58 1980 1584 112.7 — — — — +90 +91 — 30.4% -1.65 2–4 (33%) 2–1 (67%) — +0.22
35 1981 1657 140.6 — — — — -45 +98 — 48.4% -0.06 6–6 (50%) 6–5 (55%) — +0.31 1981 1510 103.4 — — — — — +86 — 15.8% -2.63 0–1 — — +0.28
36 1982 1709 120.8 — — — — +30 +2 — 56.1% +0.35 5–1 (83%) 6–7 (46%) — +3.91 1982 1466 103.6 — — — — — +64 — 0.0% -3.20 — — — -0.03
37 1983 1651 131.3 — — — — +1 +102 — 48.1% +0.08 4–5 (44%) 3–5 (38%) — +0.24 1983 1449 96.0 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — +0.31
Career — 2064 144.5 — — — — +1 +50 -25 56.2% +0.46 180–124 (59%) 107–125 (46%) 98.7 -0.50 — 2122 150.1 — — — — -50 +102 -11 60.1% +0.73 123–100 (55%) 65–52 (56%) 100.3 -0.18

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.