H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Jaime Fillol vs Jim Delaney H2H: 2-1
Jaime Fillol holds a 2–1 lead over Jim Delaney in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on carpet, while Jaime Fillol leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Jaime Fillol won the 1980 Taipei third round 7-6 7-6.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CHI
Age 80
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
USA
Age 73
Right-Handed
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 13, 1980* | Taipei | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Jaime Fillol | 7-6 7-6 | Jim Delaney | Match data |
| Apr 21, 1977* | Denver | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Jim Delaney | 6-2 6-2 | Jaime Fillol | Match data |
| Aug 4, 1975 | Indianapolis | ATP 250 | R64 | Clay | Jaime Fillol | 6-3 6-2 | Jim Delaney | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jaime Fillol | #1,171 | #14 | 8 | 2,041 | 532 | 367 | 59.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 7 |
| Jim Delaney | #262 | #59 | 0 | 1,676 | 78 | 131 | 37.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jaime Fillol | Jim Delaney | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1972 | 1–5 | 16.7% | — | 1,453 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1973 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #159 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1974 | 9–7 | 56.2% | #109 | 1,590 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1968 | 30–10 | 75.0% | — | 1,658 | 0 | 1 | 1975 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #73 | 1,645 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1969 | 27–19 | 58.7% | — | 1,673 | 0 | 1 | 1976 | 20–29 | 40.8% | #64 | 1,631 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1970 | 32–23 | 58.2% | — | 1,749 | 0 | 1 | 1977 | 16–27 | 37.2% | #133 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1971 | 43–21 | 67.2% | — | 1,774 | 0 | 3 | 1978 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #418 | 1,600 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1972 | 44–32 | 57.9% | — | 1,745 | 0 | 3 | 1979 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #276 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1973 | 51–33 | 60.7% | #17 | 1,867 | 0 | 4 | 1980 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #269 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1974 | 48–32 | 60.0% | #31 | 1,830 | 0 | 4 | 1981 | 11–21 | 34.4% | #269 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1975 | 56–27 | 67.5% | #16 | 1,962 | 0 | 4 | 1982 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #143 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 1976 | 47–27 | 63.5% | #24 | 1,928 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1977 | 44–21 | 67.7% | #24 | 1,894 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1978 | 33–29 | 53.2% | #77 | 1,756 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1979 | 21–28 | 42.9% | #124 | 1,736 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 1980 | 10–22 | 31.2% | #86 | 1,644 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 1981 | 18–19 | 48.6% | #95 | 1,654 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 1982 | 14–8 | 63.6% | #77 | 1,707 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 1983 | 14–16 | 46.7% | #85 | 1,649 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |