H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Jaime Fillol vs Jim Osborne H2H: 2-1
Jaime Fillol holds a 2–1 lead over Jim Osborne in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Jaime Fillol leads 2–0 on hard courts, while Jim Osborne leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Jaime Fillol won the 1972 Jacksonville fourth round 7-5 7-6.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CHI
Age 80
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
USA
Age 81
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 20, 1973* | Jacksonville | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Jaime Fillol | 7-5 7-6 | Jim Osborne | Match data |
| Feb 17, 1971* | New York | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Jim Osborne | 7-6 6-1 | Jaime Fillol | Match data |
| Mar 14, 1970* | Caracas | ATP 250 | QF | Hard | Jaime Fillol | 7-5 4-6 6-3 | Jim Osborne | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jaime Fillol | #1,171 | #14 | 8 | 2,041 | 532 | 367 | 59.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 7 |
| Jim Osborne | #831 | #211 | 0 | 1,817 | 118 | 121 | 49.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jaime Fillol | Jim Osborne | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 22 | 1968 | 30–10 | 75.0% | — | 1,658 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1969 | 27–19 | 58.7% | — | 1,673 | 0 | 1 | 1968 | 35–24 | 59.3% | — | 1,635 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1970 | 32–23 | 58.2% | — | 1,749 | 0 | 1 | 1969 | 29–17 | 63.0% | — | 1,745 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1971 | 43–21 | 67.2% | — | 1,774 | 0 | 3 | 1970 | 26–29 | 47.3% | — | 1,665 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1972 | 44–32 | 57.9% | — | 1,745 | 0 | 3 | 1971 | 15–19 | 44.1% | — | 1,699 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1973 | 51–33 | 60.7% | #17 | 1,867 | 0 | 4 | 1972 | 8–20 | 28.6% | — | 1,517 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1974 | 48–32 | 60.0% | #31 | 1,830 | 0 | 4 | 1973 | 0–4 | 0.0% | — | 1,494 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1975 | 56–27 | 67.5% | #16 | 1,962 | 0 | 4 | 1974 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #228 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 1976 | 47–27 | 63.5% | #24 | 1,928 | 0 | 5 | 1975 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #308 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 1977 | 44–21 | 67.7% | #24 | 1,894 | 0 | 5 | 1976 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #211 | 1,571 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 1978 | 33–29 | 53.2% | #77 | 1,756 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1979 | 21–28 | 42.9% | #124 | 1,736 | 0 | 5 | 1978 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #465 | 1,569 | 0 | 0 |
| 34 | 1980 | 10–22 | 31.2% | #86 | 1,644 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 1981 | 18–19 | 48.6% | #95 | 1,654 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 1982 | 14–8 | 63.6% | #77 | 1,707 | 0 | 7 | 1981 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,551 | 0 | 0 |
| 37 | 1983 | 14–16 | 46.7% | #85 | 1,649 | 0 | 7 | 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,538 | 0 | 0 |