H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Jaime Fillol vs Ken Rosewall H2H: 0-2
Ken Rosewall holds a 2–0 lead over Jaime Fillol in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Ken Rosewall leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Ken Rosewall won the 1971 Wimbledon third round 6-3 6-1 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CHI
Age 80
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 91
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 27, 1971* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R32 | Grass | Ken Rosewall | 6-3 6-1 6-4 | Jaime Fillol | Match data |
| Jul 25, 1970* | Cincinnati | Masters 1000 | R16 | Clay | Ken Rosewall | 6-2 6-0 | Jaime Fillol | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jaime Fillol | #1,171 | #14 | 8 | 2,041 | 532 | 367 | 59.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 7 |
| Ken Rosewall | #255 | #2 | 0 | 2,231 | 541 | 195 | 73.5% | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 35 | 40 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jaime Fillol | Ken Rosewall | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 22 | 1968 | 30–10 | 75.0% | — | 1,658 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1969 | 27–19 | 58.7% | — | 1,673 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1970 | 32–23 | 58.2% | — | 1,749 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1971 | 43–21 | 67.2% | — | 1,774 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1972 | 44–32 | 57.9% | — | 1,745 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1973 | 51–33 | 60.7% | #17 | 1,867 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1974 | 48–32 | 60.0% | #31 | 1,830 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1975 | 56–27 | 67.5% | #16 | 1,962 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1976 | 47–27 | 63.5% | #24 | 1,928 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1977 | 44–21 | 67.7% | #24 | 1,894 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1978 | 33–29 | 53.2% | #77 | 1,756 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1979 | 21–28 | 42.9% | #124 | 1,736 | 0 | 5 | 1968 | 45–12 | 78.9% | — | 1,856 | 1 | 5 |
| 34 | 1980 | 10–22 | 31.2% | #86 | 1,644 | 0 | 5 | 1969 | 49–21 | 70.0% | — | 1,941 | 1 | 8 |
| 35 | 1981 | 18–19 | 48.6% | #95 | 1,654 | 0 | 6 | 1970 | 72–21 | 77.4% | — | 2,083 | 2 | 14 |
| 36 | 1982 | 14–8 | 63.6% | #77 | 1,707 | 0 | 7 | 1971 | 80–24 | 76.9% | — | 2,154 | 3 | 22 |
| 37 | 1983 | 14–16 | 46.7% | #85 | 1,649 | 0 | 7 | 1972 | 61–15 | 80.3% | — | 2,107 | 4 | 29 |
| 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1973 | 65–17 | 79.3% | #6 | 2,102 | 4 | 34 |
| 39 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1974 | 28–8 | 77.8% | #9 | 2,106 | 4 | 34 |
| 40 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1975 | 41–12 | 77.4% | #6 | 1,994 | 4 | 37 |
| 41 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1976 | 35–18 | 66.0% | #13 | 1,974 | 4 | 39 |
| 42 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 39–20 | 66.1% | #12 | 1,975 | 4 | 40 |
| 43 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 19–19 | 50.0% | #34 | 1,808 | 4 | 40 |
| 44 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #207 | 1,746 | 4 | 40 |
| 45 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #255 | 1,746 | 4 | 40 |