H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Jaime Fillol vs Kim Warwick H2H: 3-0
Jaime Fillol holds a 3–0 lead over Kim Warwick in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Jaime Fillol leads 2–0 on grass and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Jaime Fillol won the 1977 Boston second round 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CHI
Age 80
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
3
–
0
3 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 74
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 25, 1977* | Boston | ATP 250 | R64 | Clay | Jaime Fillol | 6-3 6-3 | Kim Warwick | Match data |
| Jun 30, 1974* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R32 | Grass | Jaime Fillol | 6-3 4-6 6-1 6-4 | Kim Warwick | Match data |
| Jun 28, 1972* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Jaime Fillol | 6-0 9-7 4-6 6-3 | Kim Warwick | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jaime Fillol | #1,171 | #14 | 8 | 2,041 | 532 | 367 | 59.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 7 |
| Kim Warwick | #1,294 | #15 | 15 | 1,945 | 290 | 273 | 51.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jaime Fillol | Kim Warwick | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1969 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1970 | 6–8 | 42.9% | — | 1,472 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1971 | 4–7 | 36.4% | — | 1,467 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1972 | 11–9 | 55.0% | — | 1,569 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1973 | 11–22 | 33.3% | #108 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1968 | 30–10 | 75.0% | — | 1,658 | 0 | 1 | 1974 | 30–23 | 56.6% | #48 | 1,717 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1969 | 27–19 | 58.7% | — | 1,673 | 0 | 1 | 1975 | 28–24 | 53.8% | #49 | 1,726 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1970 | 32–23 | 58.2% | — | 1,749 | 0 | 1 | 1976 | 28–32 | 46.7% | #67 | 1,746 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1971 | 43–21 | 67.2% | — | 1,774 | 0 | 3 | 1977 | 35–29 | 54.7% | #50 | 1,710 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1972 | 44–32 | 57.9% | — | 1,745 | 0 | 3 | 1978 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #41 | 1,788 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1973 | 51–33 | 60.7% | #17 | 1,867 | 0 | 4 | 1979 | 37–27 | 57.8% | #52 | 1,804 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 1974 | 48–32 | 60.0% | #31 | 1,830 | 0 | 4 | 1980 | 39–25 | 60.9% | #36 | 1,926 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 1975 | 56–27 | 67.5% | #16 | 1,962 | 0 | 4 | 1981 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #29 | 1,743 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | 1976 | 47–27 | 63.5% | #24 | 1,928 | 0 | 5 | 1982 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #36 | 1,799 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | 1977 | 44–21 | 67.7% | #24 | 1,894 | 0 | 5 | 1983 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #99 | 1,688 | 0 | 3 |
| 32 | 1978 | 33–29 | 53.2% | #77 | 1,756 | 0 | 5 | 1984 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #196 | 1,686 | 0 | 3 |
| 33 | 1979 | 21–28 | 42.9% | #124 | 1,736 | 0 | 5 | 1985 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #497 | 1,664 | 0 | 3 |
| 34 | 1980 | 10–22 | 31.2% | #86 | 1,644 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 1981 | 18–19 | 48.6% | #95 | 1,654 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 1982 | 14–8 | 63.6% | #77 | 1,707 | 0 | 7 | 1988 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #600 | 1,652 | 0 | 3 |
| 37 | 1983 | 14–16 | 46.7% | #85 | 1,649 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |