H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Jaime Fillol vs Mel Purcell H2H: 1-0
Jaime Fillol holds a 1–0 lead over Mel Purcell in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jaime Fillol leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Jaime Fillol won the 1980 Republic of China third round 4-6 6-2 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CHI
Age 80
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 67
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 16, 1980* | Republic of China | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Jaime Fillol | 4-6 6-2 7-5 | Mel Purcell | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jaime Fillol | #1,171 | #14 | 8 | 2,041 | 532 | 367 | 59.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 7 |
| Mel Purcell | #673 | #21 | 21 | 1,991 | 190 | 164 | 53.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jaime Fillol | Mel Purcell | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #555 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #245 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 19–13 | 59.4% | #27 | 1,742 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 48–20 | 70.6% | #24 | 1,914 | 0 | 3 |
| 22 | 1968 | 30–10 | 75.0% | — | 1,658 | 0 | 1 | 1982 | 38–24 | 61.3% | #28 | 1,837 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 1969 | 27–19 | 58.7% | — | 1,673 | 0 | 1 | 1983 | 30–25 | 54.5% | #28 | 1,770 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 1970 | 32–23 | 58.2% | — | 1,749 | 0 | 1 | 1984 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #67 | 1,702 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 1971 | 43–21 | 67.2% | — | 1,774 | 0 | 3 | 1985 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #129 | 1,705 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 1972 | 44–32 | 57.9% | — | 1,745 | 0 | 3 | 1986 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #72 | 1,649 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 1973 | 51–33 | 60.7% | #17 | 1,867 | 0 | 4 | 1987 | 12–23 | 34.3% | #140 | 1,529 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 1974 | 48–32 | 60.0% | #31 | 1,830 | 0 | 4 | 1988 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #268 | 1,537 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 1975 | 56–27 | 67.5% | #16 | 1,962 | 0 | 4 | 1989 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #504 | 1,525 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | 1976 | 47–27 | 63.5% | #24 | 1,928 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1977 | 44–21 | 67.7% | #24 | 1,894 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1978 | 33–29 | 53.2% | #77 | 1,756 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1979 | 21–28 | 42.9% | #124 | 1,736 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 1980 | 10–22 | 31.2% | #86 | 1,644 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 1981 | 18–19 | 48.6% | #95 | 1,654 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 1982 | 14–8 | 63.6% | #77 | 1,707 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 1983 | 14–16 | 46.7% | #85 | 1,649 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |