H2H data updated: 2026-09-03 00:00 UTC

Jaime Fillol vs Mel Purcell H2H: 1-0

Jaime Fillol holds a 1–0 lead over Mel Purcell in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jaime Fillol leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Jaime Fillol won the 1980 Republic of China round of 32 4-6 6-2 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jaime Fillol
CHI Age 80 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main draw meetings
Mel Purcell
USA Age 67 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Jaime Fillol 4-6 6-2 7-5 Mel Purcell #31 Match data Oct 16, 1980* R32 Republic of China ATP 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Jaime Fillol #794 #14 — 2,063 534 364 59.5% 0 0 0 0 8 8
Mel Purcell #673 #21 21 1,992 190 164 53.7% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jaime Fillol Mel Purcell
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 — — — — — — — 1978 0–2 0.0% #555 1,474 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 1979 2–4 33.3% #245 1,509 0 0
20 — — — — — — — 1980 19–13 59.4% #27 1,743 0 0
21 — — — — — — — 1981 48–20 70.6% #24 1,916 0 3
22 1968 26–9 74.3% — 1,645 0 1 1982 38–24 61.3% #28 1,838 0 3
23 1969 27–19 58.7% — 1,666 0 1 1983 30–25 54.5% #28 1,771 0 3
24 1970 32–23 58.2% — 1,751 0 1 1984 20–21 48.8% #67 1,703 0 3
25 1971 43–21 67.2% — 1,774 0 3 1985 6–9 40.0% #129 1,706 0 3
26 1972 44–32 57.9% — 1,744 0 3 1986 12–16 42.9% #72 1,650 0 3
27 1973 51–33 60.7% #17 1,872 0 4 1987 12–23 34.3% #140 1,529 0 3
28 1974 46–31 59.7% #31 1,833 0 4 1988 3–6 33.3% #268 1,538 0 3
29 1975 60–26 69.8% #16 1,975 0 5 1989 0–1 0.0% #504 1,525 0 3
30 1976 50–28 64.1% #24 1,971 0 6 — — — — — — —
31 1977 46–22 67.6% #24 1,901 0 6 — — — — — — —
32 1978 32–27 54.2% #77 1,762 0 6 — — — — — — —
33 1979 21–28 42.9% #124 1,736 0 6 — — — — — — —
34 1980 10–22 31.2% #86 1,644 0 6 — — — — — — —
35 1981 18–19 48.6% #95 1,657 0 7 — — — — — — —
36 1982 14–8 63.6% #77 1,708 0 8 — — — — — — —
37 1983 14–16 46.7% #85 1,651 0 8 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Jaime Fillol Mel Purcell
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1978 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1979 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — —
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 7 5 12 58.3% 12 5 17 70.6% — — — — 0 3 3 0.0%
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 20 3 23 87.0% 20 11 31 64.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 7 5 12 58.3%
22 1968 — — — — 14 3 17 82.4% 10 5 15 66.7% 2 1 3 66.7% 1982 14 8 22 63.6% 20 8 28 71.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 7 11 36.4%
23 1969 7 5 12 58.3% 13 6 19 68.4% 7 7 14 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1983 9 8 17 52.9% 16 11 27 59.3% 4 1 5 80.0% 1 5 6 16.7%
24 1970 12 9 21 57.1% 12 5 17 70.6% 5 5 10 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 1984 9 7 16 56.3% 8 8 16 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 4 6 33.3%
25 1971 21 8 29 72.4% 10 6 16 62.5% 8 4 12 66.7% 4 3 7 57.1% 1985 3 4 7 42.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
26 1972 17 11 28 60.7% 13 9 22 59.1% 5 4 9 55.6% 9 8 17 52.9% 1986 4 5 9 44.4% 6 7 13 46.2% — — — — 2 4 6 33.3%
27 1973 17 14 31 54.8% 25 10 35 71.4% 1 1 2 50.0% 8 8 16 50.0% 1987 1 11 12 8.3% 6 7 13 46.2% 2 2 4 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
28 1974 11 8 19 57.9% 26 15 41 63.4% 5 3 8 62.5% 4 5 9 44.4% 1988 3 2 5 60.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
29 1975 9 7 16 56.3% 41 13 54 75.9% 2 2 4 50.0% 8 4 12 66.7% 1989 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1976 5 3 8 62.5% 34 16 50 68.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 8 7 15 53.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1977 4 3 7 57.1% 34 13 47 72.3% 5 2 7 71.4% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1978 3 4 7 42.9% 21 15 36 58.3% 5 3 8 62.5% 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1979 7 9 16 43.8% 11 10 21 52.4% 0 3 3 0.0% 3 6 9 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1980 5 10 15 33.3% 2 8 10 20.0% — — — — 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 1981 2 2 4 50.0% 16 14 30 53.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 1982 5 3 8 62.5% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — 5 1 6 83.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 1983 5 8 13 38.5% 9 6 15 60.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 130 104 234 55.6% 285 153 438 65.1% 56 45 101 55.4% 63 62 125 50.4% — 71 57 128 55.5% 89 65 154 57.8% 8 9 17 47.1% 22 33 55 40.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Jaime Fillol Mel Purcell
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1978 1475 97.5 — — — — — — — 20.0% -1.80 0–1 0–1 — +0.28
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1979 1509 112.5 — — — — +27 +9 — 37.5% -0.56 0–1 0–1 — -0.34
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 1744 150.1 — — — — -128 -24 — 56.8% +0.69 4–5 (44%) 2–2 (50%) — -1.39
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 1916 153.0 — — — — +9 -97 — 62.5% +0.92 16–6 (73%) 7–4 (64%) — -2.73
22 1968 1645 119.6 — — — — -75 +81 -43 67.7% +1.18 9–4 (69%) — — +1.11 1982 1838 155.1 — — — — -35 +108 — 60.0% +0.68 6–5 (55%) 7–5 (58%) — -5.38
23 1969 1667 119.9 — — — — +17 +50 -33 55.4% +0.51 8–8 (50%) — — +1.81 1983 1771 144.5 — — — — -61 +111 -55 54.8% +0.29 8–13 (38%) 9–4 (69%) — +0.37
24 1970 1752 130.4 — — — — +6 +20 -71 53.1% +0.21 12–5 (71%) 4–5 (44%) — -0.35 1984 1703 139.2 — — — — +12 +119 -31 49.5% -0.08 7–8 (47%) 5–6 (45%) — -1.17
25 1971 1774 132.9 — — — — +93 -19 -22 59.9% +0.74 16–10 (62%) 4–6 (40%) — +2.68 1985 1706 132.0 — — — — +24 — — 39.5% -0.89 3–1 (75%) 3–5 (38%) — -2.09
26 1972 1744 130.3 — — — — +53 +10 +38 58.2% +0.57 7–15 (32%) 15–14 (52%) — +7.01 1986 1650 128.8 — — — — +22 +75 — 46.5% -0.25 5–7 (42%) 3–1 (75%) — -1.07
27 1973 1873 139.9 — — — — -33 +32 — 59.6% +0.60 15–12 (56%) 17–17 (50%) — -0.71 1987 1530 132.0 — — — — +26 +134 +149 38.6% -0.47 3–6 (33%) 2–5 (29%) — 0.00
28 1974 1833 145.7 — — — — -2 +31 0 56.6% +0.59 16–12 (57%) 6–12 (33%) — -4.09 1988 1538 115.3 — — — — +78 +54 — 40.7% -0.78 1–2 (33%) 3–0 (100%) — -0.36
29 1975 1975 157.8 — — — — -83 +56 -137 63.3% +0.92 17–9 (65%) 11–10 (52%) — -5.98 1989 1526 103.2 — — — — — — — 25.0% -1.00 — 0–1 — -0.07
30 1976 1972 157.9 — — — — -26 +33 -116 58.9% +0.79 22–7 (76%) 7–17 (29%) — -4.07 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1977 1902 145.9 — — — — -65 +78 -56 61.2% +0.52 14–3 (82%) 11–5 (69%) — +0.66 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1978 1763 140.0 — — — — -7 +59 +95 54.2% +0.18 11–14 (44%) 8–5 (62%) — -4.40 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1979 1737 136.4 — — — — -7 +55 +28 42.4% -0.36 11–7 (61%) 5–7 (42%) — -2.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1980 1644 125.6 — — — — +4 +66 — 34.2% -1.03 7–6 (54%) 4–10 (29%) — -0.58 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 1981 1657 140.6 — — — — -45 +98 — 48.4% -0.06 6–6 (50%) 6–5 (55%) — +0.31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 1982 1709 120.8 — — — — +30 +2 — 56.1% +0.35 5–1 (83%) 6–7 (46%) — +3.91 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 1983 1651 131.3 — — — — +1 +102 — 48.1% +0.08 4–5 (44%) 3–5 (38%) — +0.24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2064 144.5 — — — — +1 +50 -25 56.2% +0.46 180–124 (59%) 107–125 (46%) 98.7 -0.50 — 1993 150.0 — — — — -13 +49 +19 52.7% +0.23 53–55 (49%) 41–35 (54%) 100.0 -3.94

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.