H2H data updated: 2026-07-17 14:15 UTC
Jaime Fillol vs Nikola Pilic H2H: 2-3
Nikola Pilic holds a 3–2 lead over Jaime Fillol in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Jaime Fillol leads 2–0 on clay, while Nikola Pilic leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jaime Fillol won the 1977 Hamburg third round 7-5 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CHI
Age 80
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
2
–
3
5 main draw meetings
CRO
Left-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 12, 1977* | Hamburg | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Jaime Fillol | 7-5 6-3 | Nikola Pilic | Match data |
| Oct 9, 1976* | Aviles | ATP 250 | QF | Clay | Jaime Fillol | 6-4 6-1 | Nikola Pilic | Match data |
| Nov 8, 1973* | Stockholm | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Nikola Pilic | 6-3 7-6 | Jaime Fillol | Match data |
| Nov 7, 1972* | Stockholm | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Nikola Pilic | 6-4 7-5 | Jaime Fillol | Match data |
| Sep 4, 1970* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Nikola Pilic | 6-2 6-2 7-6 | Jaime Fillol | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jaime Fillol | #1,171 | #14 | 8 | 2,041 | 532 | 367 | 59.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 7 |
| Nikola Pilic | #284 | #12 | 0 | 1,953 | 301 | 248 | 54.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jaime Fillol | Nikola Pilic | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 22 | 1968 | 30–10 | 75.0% | — | 1,658 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1969 | 27–19 | 58.7% | — | 1,673 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1970 | 32–23 | 58.2% | — | 1,749 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1971 | 43–21 | 67.2% | — | 1,774 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1972 | 44–32 | 57.9% | — | 1,745 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1973 | 51–33 | 60.7% | #17 | 1,867 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1974 | 48–32 | 60.0% | #31 | 1,830 | 0 | 4 | 1968 | 42–46 | 47.7% | — | 1,638 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 1975 | 56–27 | 67.5% | #16 | 1,962 | 0 | 4 | 1969 | 27–24 | 52.9% | — | 1,767 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 1976 | 47–27 | 63.5% | #24 | 1,928 | 0 | 5 | 1970 | 47–31 | 60.3% | — | 1,891 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | 1977 | 44–21 | 67.7% | #24 | 1,894 | 0 | 5 | 1971 | 39–31 | 55.7% | — | 1,836 | 0 | 4 |
| 32 | 1978 | 33–29 | 53.2% | #77 | 1,756 | 0 | 5 | 1972 | 34–28 | 54.8% | — | 1,894 | 0 | 5 |
| 33 | 1979 | 21–28 | 42.9% | #124 | 1,736 | 0 | 5 | 1973 | 44–27 | 62.0% | #15 | 1,840 | 0 | 5 |
| 34 | 1980 | 10–22 | 31.2% | #86 | 1,644 | 0 | 5 | 1974 | 22–12 | 64.7% | #32 | 1,898 | 0 | 5 |
| 35 | 1981 | 18–19 | 48.6% | #95 | 1,654 | 0 | 6 | 1975 | 20–15 | 57.1% | #50 | 1,857 | 0 | 6 |
| 36 | 1982 | 14–8 | 63.6% | #77 | 1,707 | 0 | 7 | 1976 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #68 | 1,743 | 0 | 6 |
| 37 | 1983 | 14–16 | 46.7% | #85 | 1,649 | 0 | 7 | 1977 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #91 | 1,701 | 0 | 6 |
| 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #284 | 1,622 | 0 | 6 |