Jaime Fillol
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raymond Moore | 9 | 7 | 16 | Oct 3, 1981 | H2H |
| Guillermo Vilas | 2 | 13 | 15 | Apr 10, 1981 | H2H |
| Manuel Orantes | 5 | 9 | 14 | Jan 29, 1982 | H2H |
| Stan Smith | 3 | 11 | 14 | Jun 11, 1977 | H2H |
| Andrew Pattison | 7 | 6 | 13 | Jul 9, 1981 | — |
H2H data updated: 2026-10-20 00:00 UTC
Rod Laver holds a 4–1 lead over Jaime Fillol in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Rod Laver leads 2–0 on grass and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Jaime Fillol won the 1975 Las Vegas round of 16 6-3 7-6.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jaime Fillol | 6-3 7-6 | Rod Laver | Match data | May 16, 1975* | R16 | Las Vegas | ATP 250 | Hard |
| Rod Laver | 1-6 7-5 6-3 | Jaime Fillol | Match data | Apr 12, 1975* | QF | St. Louis | ATP 250 | Clay |
| Rod Laver | 6-2 4-6 6-7 6-1 7-6 | Jaime Fillol | Match data | Sep 5, 1972* | R32 | US Open | Grand Slam | Grass |
| Rod Laver | 7-5 7-5 | Jaime Fillol | Match data | Nov 19, 1970* | R32 | Wembley | ATP 250 | Carpet |
| Rod Laver | 8-6 6-1 6-2 | Jaime Fillol | Match data | Sep 2, 1969* | R32 | US Open | Grand Slam | Grass |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jaime Fillol | #794 | #14 | — | 2,063 | 531 | 363 | 59.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 8 |
| Rod Laver | #662 | #3 | 0 | 2,302 | 570 | 145 | 79.7% | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 64 | 69 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jaime Fillol | Rod Laver | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 22 | 1968 | 26–9 | 74.3% | — | 1,645 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1969 | 27–19 | 58.7% | — | 1,666 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1970 | 29–22 | 56.9% | — | 1,739 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1971 | 43–21 | 67.2% | — | 1,773 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1972 | 44–32 | 57.9% | — | 1,744 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1973 | 51–33 | 60.7% | #17 | 1,872 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1974 | 46–31 | 59.7% | #31 | 1,833 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1975 | 60–26 | 69.8% | #16 | 1,974 | 0 | 5 | 1968 | 73–19 | 79.3% | — | 1,879 | 1 | 10 |
| 30 | 1976 | 50–28 | 64.1% | #24 | 1,971 | 0 | 6 | 1969 | 97–14 | 87.4% | — | 2,162 | 5 | 26 |
| 31 | 1977 | 46–22 | 67.6% | #24 | 1,901 | 0 | 6 | 1970 | 89–15 | 85.6% | — | 2,214 | 5 | 39 |
| 32 | 1978 | 32–27 | 54.2% | #77 | 1,762 | 0 | 6 | 1971 | 85–20 | 81.0% | — | 2,157 | 5 | 46 |
| 33 | 1979 | 21–28 | 42.9% | #124 | 1,736 | 0 | 6 | 1972 | 50–16 | 75.8% | — | 2,017 | 5 | 51 |
| 34 | 1980 | 10–22 | 31.2% | #86 | 1,644 | 0 | 6 | 1973 | 67–16 | 80.7% | #8 | 2,103 | 5 | 58 |
| 35 | 1981 | 18–19 | 48.6% | #95 | 1,657 | 0 | 7 | 1974 | 42–9 | 82.4% | #4 | 2,123 | 5 | 64 |
| 36 | 1982 | 14–8 | 63.6% | #77 | 1,708 | 0 | 8 | 1975 | 49–12 | 80.3% | #10 | 2,099 | 5 | 69 |
| 37 | 1983 | 14–16 | 46.7% | #85 | 1,651 | 0 | 8 | 1976 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #73 | 2,006 | 5 | 69 |
| 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #106 | 1,937 | 5 | 69 |
| 39 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #216 | 1,926 | 5 | 69 |
| 40 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #662 | 1,909 | 5 | 69 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Jaime Fillol | Rod Laver | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 22 | 1968 | — | — | — | — | 14 | 3 | 17 | 82.4% | 10 | 5 | 15 | 66.7% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1969 | 7 | 5 | 12 | 58.3% | 13 | 6 | 19 | 68.4% | 7 | 7 | 14 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1970 | 12 | 9 | 21 | 57.1% | 9 | 4 | 13 | 69.2% | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1971 | 21 | 8 | 29 | 72.4% | 10 | 6 | 16 | 62.5% | 8 | 4 | 12 | 66.7% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1972 | 17 | 11 | 28 | 60.7% | 13 | 9 | 22 | 59.1% | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% | 9 | 8 | 17 | 52.9% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1973 | 17 | 14 | 31 | 54.8% | 25 | 10 | 35 | 71.4% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 8 | 8 | 16 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1974 | 11 | 8 | 19 | 57.9% | 26 | 15 | 41 | 63.4% | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1975 | 9 | 7 | 16 | 56.3% | 41 | 13 | 54 | 75.9% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 8 | 4 | 12 | 66.7% | 1968 | 16 | 6 | 22 | 72.7% | 31 | 9 | 40 | 77.5% | 17 | 2 | 19 | 89.5% | 9 | 2 | 11 | 81.8% |
| 30 | 1976 | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | 34 | 16 | 50 | 68.0% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 8 | 7 | 15 | 53.3% | 1969 | 21 | 4 | 25 | 84.0% | 12 | 4 | 16 | 75.0% | 34 | 3 | 37 | 91.9% | 30 | 3 | 33 | 90.9% |
| 31 | 1977 | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 34 | 13 | 47 | 72.3% | 5 | 2 | 7 | 71.4% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 1970 | 33 | 3 | 36 | 91.7% | 8 | 2 | 10 | 80.0% | 21 | 4 | 25 | 84.0% | 27 | 6 | 33 | 81.8% |
| 32 | 1978 | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 21 | 15 | 36 | 58.3% | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | 1971 | 27 | 4 | 31 | 87.1% | 14 | 6 | 20 | 70.0% | 10 | 3 | 13 | 76.9% | 34 | 7 | 41 | 82.9% |
| 33 | 1979 | 7 | 9 | 16 | 43.8% | 11 | 10 | 21 | 52.4% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 3 | 6 | 9 | 33.3% | 1972 | 8 | 6 | 14 | 57.1% | 9 | 4 | 13 | 69.2% | 3 | 1 | 4 | 75.0% | 30 | 5 | 35 | 85.7% |
| 34 | 1980 | 5 | 10 | 15 | 33.3% | 2 | 8 | 10 | 20.0% | — | — | — | — | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 1973 | 18 | 3 | 21 | 85.7% | 19 | 6 | 25 | 76.0% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 28 | 6 | 34 | 82.4% |
| 35 | 1981 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 16 | 14 | 30 | 53.3% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1974 | 12 | 2 | 14 | 85.7% | 15 | 0 | 15 | 100.0% | — | — | — | — | 15 | 7 | 22 | 68.2% |
| 36 | 1982 | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 5 | 1 | 6 | 83.3% | 1975 | 19 | 2 | 21 | 90.5% | 21 | 7 | 28 | 75.0% | — | — | — | — | 9 | 3 | 12 | 75.0% |
| 37 | 1983 | 5 | 8 | 13 | 38.5% | 9 | 6 | 15 | 60.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 1976 | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% |
| 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% |
| 39 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% |
| 40 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 130 | 104 | 234 | 55.6% | 282 | 152 | 434 | 65.0% | 56 | 45 | 101 | 55.4% | 63 | 62 | 125 | 50.4% | — | 160 | 36 | 196 | 81.6% | 129 | 41 | 170 | 75.9% | 88 | 16 | 104 | 84.6% | 193 | 52 | 245 | 78.8% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Jaime Fillol | Rod Laver | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 22 | 1968 | 1645 | 119.6 | — | — | — | — | -75 | +81 | -43 | 67.7% | +1.18 | 9–4 (69%) | — | — | +1.11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1969 | 1667 | 119.9 | — | — | — | — | +17 | +50 | -33 | 55.4% | +0.51 | 8–8 (50%) | — | — | +1.81 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1970 | 1740 | 128.7 | — | — | — | — | +17 | +9 | -60 | 51.5% | +0.13 | 12–4 (75%) | 4–5 (44%) | 105.1 | 0.00 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1971 | 1773 | 132.8 | — | — | — | — | +94 | -30 | -21 | 59.9% | +0.74 | 16–10 (62%) | 4–6 (40%) | 101.2 | +2.69 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1972 | 1744 | 130.4 | — | — | — | — | +51 | +6 | +38 | 58.2% | +0.57 | 7–15 (32%) | 15–14 (52%) | 93.4 | +6.96 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1973 | 1872 | 139.8 | — | — | — | — | -32 | +33 | — | 59.6% | +0.60 | 15–12 (56%) | 17–17 (50%) | 101.4 | -0.69 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1974 | 1833 | 145.7 | — | — | — | — | -3 | +31 | 0 | 56.6% | +0.59 | 16–12 (57%) | 6–12 (33%) | 95.2 | -4.10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1975 | 1975 | 157.7 | — | — | — | — | -83 | +57 | -137 | 63.3% | +0.92 | 17–9 (65%) | 11–10 (52%) | 105.2 | -5.97 | 1968 | 1880 | 130.3 | — | — | — | — | +5 | -6 | +3 | 74.4% | +1.65 | 15–6 (71%) | — | — | -0.22 |
| 30 | 1976 | 1972 | 157.9 | — | — | — | — | -27 | +33 | -116 | 58.9% | +0.79 | 22–7 (76%) | 7–17 (29%) | 99.3 | -4.08 | 1969 | 2162 | 149.8 | — | — | — | — | +113 | -174 | +143 | 76.7% | +1.93 | 22–7 (76%) | — | — | -1.40 |
| 31 | 1977 | 1901 | 145.9 | — | — | — | — | -64 | +78 | -55 | 61.2% | +0.52 | 14–3 (82%) | 11–5 (69%) | 111.7 | +0.66 | 1970 | 2214 | 155.8 | — | — | — | — | +204 | -197 | +12 | 76.8% | +1.87 | 21–6 (78%) | 6–2 (75%) | 105.7 | -1.24 |
| 32 | 1978 | 1762 | 140.0 | — | — | — | — | -7 | +60 | +96 | 54.2% | +0.18 | 11–14 (44%) | 8–5 (62%) | 92.6 | -4.40 | 1971 | 2157 | 162.6 | — | — | — | — | +161 | -163 | 0 | 71.8% | +1.59 | 26–7 (79%) | 11–14 (44%) | 99.7 | -5.73 |
| 33 | 1979 | 1737 | 136.4 | — | — | — | — | -7 | +55 | +28 | 42.4% | -0.36 | 11–7 (61%) | 5–7 (42%) | 102.8 | -2.01 | 1972 | 2018 | 162.7 | — | — | — | — | +114 | -23 | +111 | 69.6% | +1.41 | 13–11 (54%) | 7–10 (41%) | 89.2 | -3.84 |
| 34 | 1980 | 1644 | 125.6 | — | — | — | — | +4 | +66 | — | 34.2% | -1.03 | 7–6 (54%) | 4–10 (29%) | 97.9 | -0.58 | 1973 | 2103 | 156.6 | — | — | — | — | +130 | -105 | -10 | 73.5% | +1.55 | 18–7 (72%) | 17–10 (63%) | 102.6 | -2.10 |
| 35 | 1981 | 1657 | 140.6 | — | — | — | — | -45 | +97 | — | 48.4% | -0.06 | 6–6 (50%) | 6–5 (55%) | 100.4 | +0.31 | 1974 | 2124 | 154.5 | — | — | — | — | +39 | +3 | — | 73.2% | +1.66 | 12–3 (80%) | 6–3 (67%) | 105.2 | -0.95 |
| 36 | 1982 | 1709 | 120.7 | — | — | — | — | +30 | +1 | — | 56.1% | +0.35 | 5–1 (83%) | 6–7 (46%) | 102.5 | +3.91 | 1975 | 2100 | 163.1 | — | — | — | — | +101 | -5 | — | 71.6% | +1.53 | 16–7 (70%) | 14–11 (56%) | 100.3 | -2.95 |
| 37 | 1983 | 1651 | 131.3 | — | — | — | — | 0 | +102 | — | 48.1% | +0.08 | 4–5 (44%) | 3–5 (38%) | 95.2 | +0.24 | 1976 | 2006 | 156.1 | — | — | — | — | +89 | +18 | — | 46.0% | -0.38 | 2–3 (40%) | 6–2 (75%) | 102.1 | -2.11 |
| 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 1937 | 147.8 | — | — | — | — | +75 | — | +86 | 44.4% | -0.42 | 1–4 (20%) | — | — | -2.94 |
| 39 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 1926 | 125.9 | — | — | — | — | +45 | — | — | 50.0% | 0.00 | 2–0 | 1–1 | — | -0.22 |
| 40 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 1910 | 103.6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 33.3% | -2.33 | 0–1 | 1–0 | — | -0.31 |
| Career | — | 2064 | 144.4 | — | — | — | — | +2 | +49 | -24 | 56.2% | +0.45 | 180–123 (59%) | 107–125 (46%) | 99.0 | -0.47 | — | 2302 | 159.0 | — | — | — | — | +119 | -66 | +61 | 72.3% | +1.57 | 148–62 (70%) | 69–53 (57%) | 102.7 | -3.39 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raymond Moore | 9 | 7 | 16 | Oct 3, 1981 | H2H |
| Guillermo Vilas | 2 | 13 | 15 | Apr 10, 1981 | H2H |
| Manuel Orantes | 5 | 9 | 14 | Jan 29, 1982 | H2H |
| Stan Smith | 3 | 11 | 14 | Jun 11, 1977 | H2H |
| Andrew Pattison | 7 | 6 | 13 | Jul 9, 1981 | — |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Roy Emerson | 26 | 6 | 32 | Mar 14, 1975 | H2H |
| Ken Rosewall | 24 | 7 | 31 | Apr 10, 1976 | H2H |
| Tom Okker | 22 | 3 | 25 | May 18, 1974 | H2H |
| Fred Stolle | 20 | 4 | 24 | Apr 12, 1974 | H2H |
| Arthur Ashe | 19 | 2 | 21 | Feb 28, 1976 | H2H |