H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Jaime Fillol vs Rod Laver H2H: 1-4
Rod Laver holds a 4–1 lead over Jaime Fillol in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Rod Laver leads 2–0 on grass and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Jaime Fillol won the 1975 Las Vegas fourth round 6-3 7-6.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CHI
Age 80
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
4
5 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 87
Left-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 16, 1975* | Las Vegas | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Jaime Fillol | 6-3 7-6 | Rod Laver | Match data |
| Apr 12, 1975* | St. Louis | ATP 250 | QF | Clay | Rod Laver | 1-6 7-5 6-3 | Jaime Fillol | Match data |
| Sep 5, 1972* | US Open | Grand Slam | R32 | Grass | Rod Laver | 6-2 4-6 6-7 6-1 7-6 | Jaime Fillol | Match data |
| Nov 19, 1970* | Wembley | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Rod Laver | 7-5 7-5 | Jaime Fillol | Match data |
| Sep 2, 1969* | US Open | Grand Slam | R32 | Grass | Rod Laver | 8-6 6-1 6-2 | Jaime Fillol | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jaime Fillol | #1,171 | #14 | 8 | 2,041 | 532 | 367 | 59.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 7 |
| Rod Laver | #662 | #3 | 0 | 2,300 | 576 | 147 | 79.7% | 5 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 65 | 72 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jaime Fillol | Rod Laver | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 22 | 1968 | 30–10 | 75.0% | — | 1,658 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1969 | 27–19 | 58.7% | — | 1,673 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1970 | 32–23 | 58.2% | — | 1,749 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1971 | 43–21 | 67.2% | — | 1,774 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1972 | 44–32 | 57.9% | — | 1,745 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1973 | 51–33 | 60.7% | #17 | 1,867 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1974 | 48–32 | 60.0% | #31 | 1,830 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1975 | 56–27 | 67.5% | #16 | 1,962 | 0 | 4 | 1968 | 73–19 | 79.3% | — | 1,881 | 1 | 13 |
| 30 | 1976 | 47–27 | 63.5% | #24 | 1,928 | 0 | 5 | 1969 | 97–14 | 87.4% | — | 2,161 | 5 | 29 |
| 31 | 1977 | 44–21 | 67.7% | #24 | 1,894 | 0 | 5 | 1970 | 89–15 | 85.6% | — | 2,213 | 5 | 42 |
| 32 | 1978 | 33–29 | 53.2% | #77 | 1,756 | 0 | 5 | 1971 | 85–20 | 81.0% | — | 2,155 | 5 | 49 |
| 33 | 1979 | 21–28 | 42.9% | #124 | 1,736 | 0 | 5 | 1972 | 50–16 | 75.8% | — | 2,016 | 5 | 54 |
| 34 | 1980 | 10–22 | 31.2% | #86 | 1,644 | 0 | 5 | 1973 | 67–16 | 80.7% | #8 | 2,088 | 5 | 61 |
| 35 | 1981 | 18–19 | 48.6% | #95 | 1,654 | 0 | 6 | 1974 | 45–10 | 81.8% | #4 | 2,115 | 5 | 67 |
| 36 | 1982 | 14–8 | 63.6% | #77 | 1,707 | 0 | 7 | 1975 | 52–13 | 80.0% | #10 | 2,087 | 5 | 72 |
| 37 | 1983 | 14–16 | 46.7% | #85 | 1,649 | 0 | 7 | 1976 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #73 | 1,995 | 5 | 72 |
| 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #124 | 1,927 | 5 | 72 |
| 39 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #216 | 1,917 | 5 | 72 |
| 40 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #662 | 1,901 | 5 | 72 |