H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Jaime Fillol vs Rolf Gehring H2H: 0-4
Rolf Gehring holds a 4–0 lead over Jaime Fillol in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Rolf Gehring leads 4–0 on clay. Most recently, Rolf Gehring won the 1981 Buenos Aires fourth round 7-6 7-6.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CHI
Age 80
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0
–
4
4 main draw meetings
GER
Age 70
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 20, 1981* | Buenos Aires | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Rolf Gehring | 7-6 7-6 | Jaime Fillol | Match data |
| Dec 8, 1978* | Santiago | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Rolf Gehring | 6-4 3-6 8-6 | Jaime Fillol | Match data |
| Nov 29, 1978* | Buenos Aires | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Rolf Gehring | 6-3 2-6 6-2 | Jaime Fillol | Match data |
| Nov 23, 1978* | Bogota | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Rolf Gehring | 2-6 6-2 6-3 | Jaime Fillol | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jaime Fillol | #1,171 | #14 | 8 | 2,041 | 532 | 367 | 59.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 7 |
| Rolf Gehring | #870 | #30 | 0 | 1,828 | 113 | 130 | 46.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jaime Fillol | Rolf Gehring | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1974 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #249 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1975 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #179 | 1,564 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1976 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #239 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 8–8 | 50.0% | #113 | 1,614 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1968 | 30–10 | 75.0% | — | 1,658 | 0 | 1 | 1978 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #52 | 1,728 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1969 | 27–19 | 58.7% | — | 1,673 | 0 | 1 | 1979 | 16–15 | 51.6% | #54 | 1,752 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1970 | 32–23 | 58.2% | — | 1,749 | 0 | 1 | 1980 | 23–18 | 56.1% | #39 | 1,778 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1971 | 43–21 | 67.2% | — | 1,774 | 0 | 3 | 1981 | 22–19 | 53.7% | #42 | 1,765 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1972 | 44–32 | 57.9% | — | 1,745 | 0 | 3 | 1982 | 3–21 | 12.5% | #77 | 1,566 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1973 | 51–33 | 60.7% | #17 | 1,867 | 0 | 4 | 1983 | 8–6 | 57.1% | #93 | 1,610 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 1974 | 48–32 | 60.0% | #31 | 1,830 | 0 | 4 | 1984 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #154 | 1,567 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 1975 | 56–27 | 67.5% | #16 | 1,962 | 0 | 4 | 1985 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #270 | 1,581 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 1976 | 47–27 | 63.5% | #24 | 1,928 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1977 | 44–21 | 67.7% | #24 | 1,894 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1978 | 33–29 | 53.2% | #77 | 1,756 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1979 | 21–28 | 42.9% | #124 | 1,736 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 1980 | 10–22 | 31.2% | #86 | 1,644 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 1981 | 18–19 | 48.6% | #95 | 1,654 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 1982 | 14–8 | 63.6% | #77 | 1,707 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 1983 | 14–16 | 46.7% | #85 | 1,649 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |