H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC

Jaime Fillol vs Roscoe Tanner H2H: 3-2

Jaime Fillol holds a 3–2 lead over Roscoe Tanner in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Jaime Fillol leads 2–1 on clay, while Roscoe Tanner leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Jaime Fillol won the 1975 Louisville round of 16 6-3 3-6 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jaime Fillol
CHI Age 80 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
3 – 2
5 main draw meetings
Roscoe Tanner
USA Age 74 Left-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Jaime Fillol 6-3 3-6 6-1 Roscoe Tanner Match data Aug 9, 1975* R16 Louisville ATP 250 Clay
Roscoe Tanner #14 4-6 6-4 6-3 Jaime Fillol #25 Match data Apr 26, 1975* QF Charlotte ATP 250 Clay
Jaime Fillol 7-6 6-4 Roscoe Tanner Match data Feb 24, 1972* R16 Salisbury ATP 250 Hard
Roscoe Tanner 6-2 2-6 6-4 Jaime Fillol Match data Feb 17, 1972* R32 Los Angeles ATP 250 Carpet
Jaime Fillol 8-6 6-4 Roscoe Tanner Match data Jul 22, 1970* R64 Cincinnati Open ATP 500 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Jaime Fillol #794 #14 — 2,063 534 364 59.5% 0 0 0 0 8 8
Roscoe Tanner #789 #4 0 2,162 592 294 66.8% 1 0 0 0 16 17

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jaime Fillol Roscoe Tanner
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 1969 0–2 0.0% — 1,479 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 1970 0–9 0.0% — 1,416 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 1971 16–10 61.5% — 1,706 0 0
20 — — — — — — — 1972 29–14 67.4% — 1,910 0 0
21 — — — — — — — 1973 45–30 60.0% #24 1,837 0 0
22 1968 26–9 74.3% — 1,645 0 1 1974 65–27 70.7% #14 1,963 0 2
23 1969 27–19 58.7% — 1,666 0 1 1975 65–23 73.9% #9 1,972 0 5
24 1970 32–23 58.2% — 1,751 0 1 1976 70–28 71.4% #11 2,018 0 9
25 1971 43–21 67.2% — 1,774 0 3 1977 52–30 63.4% #13 1,889 1 11
26 1972 44–32 57.9% — 1,744 0 3 1978 57–22 72.2% #11 1,940 1 13
27 1973 51–33 60.7% #17 1,872 0 4 1979 61–19 76.2% #5 2,032 1 15
28 1974 46–31 59.7% #31 1,833 0 4 1980 42–16 72.4% #13 1,996 1 16
29 1975 60–26 69.8% #16 1,975 0 5 1981 51–22 69.9% #12 1,925 1 17
30 1976 50–28 64.1% #24 1,971 0 6 1982 20–17 54.1% #43 1,785 1 17
31 1977 46–22 67.6% #24 1,901 0 6 1983 16–13 55.2% #36 1,874 1 17
32 1978 32–27 54.2% #77 1,762 0 6 1984 3–11 21.4% #249 1,680 1 17
33 1979 21–28 42.9% #124 1,736 0 6 1985 0–1 0.0% #794 1,662 1 17
34 1980 10–22 31.2% #86 1,644 0 6 — — — — — — —
35 1981 18–19 48.6% #95 1,657 0 7 — — — — — — —
36 1982 14–8 63.6% #77 1,708 0 8 — — — — — — —
37 1983 14–16 46.7% #85 1,651 0 8 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Jaime Fillol Roscoe Tanner
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1969 — — — — — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1970 0 4 4 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1971 10 5 15 66.7% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0%
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1972 9 3 12 75.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 9 3 12 75.0% 6 3 9 66.7%
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1973 12 8 20 60.0% 15 9 24 62.5% 3 4 7 42.9% 15 9 24 62.5%
22 1968 — — — — 14 3 17 82.4% 10 5 15 66.7% 2 1 3 66.7% 1974 30 11 41 73.2% 8 7 15 53.3% 17 3 20 85.0% 10 6 16 62.5%
23 1969 7 5 12 58.3% 13 6 19 68.4% 7 7 14 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1975 27 7 34 79.4% 16 8 24 66.7% 9 2 11 81.8% 13 6 19 68.4%
24 1970 12 9 21 57.1% 12 5 17 70.6% 5 5 10 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 1976 22 10 32 68.8% 22 6 28 78.6% 10 3 13 76.9% 16 9 25 64.0%
25 1971 21 8 29 72.4% 10 6 16 62.5% 8 4 12 66.7% 4 3 7 57.1% 1977 8 6 14 57.1% 16 9 25 64.0% 22 6 28 78.6% 6 9 15 40.0%
26 1972 17 11 28 60.7% 13 9 22 59.1% 5 4 9 55.6% 9 8 17 52.9% 1978 19 8 27 70.4% 6 3 9 66.7% 7 2 9 77.8% 25 9 34 73.5%
27 1973 17 14 31 54.8% 25 10 35 71.4% 1 1 2 50.0% 8 8 16 50.0% 1979 21 5 26 80.8% 5 2 7 71.4% 10 2 12 83.3% 25 10 35 71.4%
28 1974 11 8 19 57.9% 26 15 41 63.4% 5 3 8 62.5% 4 5 9 44.4% 1980 14 6 20 70.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 12 2 14 85.7% 16 7 23 69.6%
29 1975 9 7 16 56.3% 41 13 54 75.9% 2 2 4 50.0% 8 4 12 66.7% 1981 19 8 27 70.4% 1 1 2 50.0% 10 5 15 66.7% 21 8 29 72.4%
30 1976 5 3 8 62.5% 34 16 50 68.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 8 7 15 53.3% 1982 10 8 18 55.6% — — — — 4 2 6 66.7% 6 7 13 46.2%
31 1977 4 3 7 57.1% 34 13 47 72.3% 5 2 7 71.4% 3 4 7 42.9% 1983 7 5 12 58.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 3 4 7 42.9%
32 1978 3 4 7 42.9% 21 15 36 58.3% 5 3 8 62.5% 3 5 8 37.5% 1984 1 8 9 11.1% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3%
33 1979 7 9 16 43.8% 11 10 21 52.4% 0 3 3 0.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 1985 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
34 1980 5 10 15 33.3% 2 8 10 20.0% — — — — 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 1981 2 2 4 50.0% 16 14 30 53.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 1982 5 3 8 62.5% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — 5 1 6 83.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 1983 5 8 13 38.5% 9 6 15 60.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 130 104 234 55.6% 285 153 438 65.1% 56 45 101 55.4% 63 62 125 50.4% — 209 102 311 67.2% 99 59 158 62.7% 121 42 163 74.2% 163 91 254 64.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Jaime Fillol Roscoe Tanner
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1969 1479 102.4 — — — — — — — 28.6% -1.14 0–1 — — -0.17
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1970 1417 113.2 — — — — +103 +73 — 13.6% -1.45 0–2 1–2 (33%) — -0.50
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1971 1706 127.5 — — — — -2 -129 -172 56.9% +0.31 6–2 (75%) 5–4 (56%) — -0.17
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1972 1910 135.7 — — — — -21 -296 -167 59.5% +0.43 11–3 (79%) 14–8 (64%) — -0.27
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1973 1838 144.5 — — — — +53 -90 -106 56.7% +0.51 11–10 (52%) 15–15 (50%) — -3.40
22 1968 1645 119.6 — — — — -75 +81 -43 67.7% +1.18 9–4 (69%) — — +1.11 1974 1963 154.0 — — — — -10 -226 +137 65.9% +1.12 16–13 (55%) 15–17 (47%) — -2.27
23 1969 1667 119.9 — — — — +17 +50 -33 55.4% +0.51 8–8 (50%) — — +1.81 1975 1972 153.3 — — — — +62 -153 +164 67.7% +1.19 19–14 (58%) 17–14 (55%) — -0.74
24 1970 1752 130.4 — — — — +6 +20 -71 53.1% +0.21 12–5 (71%) 4–5 (44%) — -0.35 1976 2018 159.4 — — — — +24 -49 +104 66.7% +1.29 18–11 (62%) 18–20 (47%) — -2.11
25 1971 1774 132.9 — — — — +93 -19 -22 59.9% +0.74 16–10 (62%) 4–6 (40%) — +2.68 1977 1890 153.2 — — — — -1 +22 +206 62.7% +0.94 13–18 (42%) 11–12 (48%) — -0.49
26 1972 1744 130.3 — — — — +53 +10 +38 58.2% +0.57 7–15 (32%) 15–14 (52%) — +7.01 1978 1941 160.3 — — — — +36 -25 +162 67.2% +1.20 10–8 (56%) 23–10 (70%) — -1.59
27 1973 1873 139.9 — — — — -33 +32 — 59.6% +0.60 15–12 (56%) 17–17 (50%) — -0.71 1979 2032 164.1 — — — — +32 -91 +131 71.3% +1.27 13–8 (62%) 22–14 (61%) — -3.91
28 1974 1833 145.7 — — — — -2 +31 0 56.6% +0.59 16–12 (57%) 6–12 (33%) — -4.09 1980 1997 154.8 — — — — +23 — +198 70.9% +1.29 6–10 (38%) 17–5 (77%) — -1.79
29 1975 1975 157.8 — — — — -83 +56 -137 63.3% +0.92 17–9 (65%) 11–10 (52%) — -5.98 1981 1926 156.1 — — — — +117 — +82 66.0% +1.02 14–9 (61%) 19–13 (59%) — -0.51
30 1976 1972 157.9 — — — — -26 +33 -116 58.9% +0.79 22–7 (76%) 7–17 (29%) — -4.07 1982 1786 138.8 — — — — +4 — +208 51.5% -0.01 9–6 (60%) 10–12 (45%) — -2.07
31 1977 1902 145.9 — — — — -65 +78 -56 61.2% +0.52 14–3 (82%) 11–5 (69%) — +0.66 1983 1874 146.4 — — — — -44 — +125 53.4% +0.14 7–5 (58%) 11–7 (61%) — -4.29
32 1978 1763 140.0 — — — — -7 +59 +95 54.2% +0.18 11–14 (44%) 8–5 (62%) — -4.40 1984 1681 120.1 — — — — -28 — — 25.8% -1.52 2–2 (50%) 1–2 (33%) — -0.69
33 1979 1737 136.4 — — — — -7 +55 +28 42.4% -0.36 11–7 (61%) 5–7 (42%) — -2.01 1985 1662 99.2 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 1–0 — +0.08
34 1980 1644 125.6 — — — — +4 +66 — 34.2% -1.03 7–6 (54%) 4–10 (29%) — -0.58 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 1981 1657 140.6 — — — — -45 +98 — 48.4% -0.06 6–6 (50%) 6–5 (55%) — +0.31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 1982 1709 120.8 — — — — +30 +2 — 56.1% +0.35 5–1 (83%) 6–7 (46%) — +3.91 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 1983 1651 131.3 — — — — +1 +102 — 48.1% +0.08 4–5 (44%) 3–5 (38%) — +0.24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2064 144.5 — — — — +1 +50 -25 56.2% +0.46 180–124 (59%) 107–125 (46%) 98.7 -0.50 — 2162 157.4 — — — — +30 -96 +112 63.1% +0.88 155–123 (56%) 200–155 (56%) 99.8 -2.84

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.