H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Jaime Fillol vs Roscoe Tanner H2H: 4-2

Jaime Fillol holds a 4–2 lead over Roscoe Tanner in their ATP head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Jaime Fillol leads 2–1 on clay and 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jaime Fillol won the 1975 Louisville fourth round 6-3 3-6 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jaime Fillol
CHI Age 80 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
4 – 2
6 main draw meetings
Roscoe Tanner
USA Age 74 Left-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 9, 1975* Louisville ATP 250 R16 Clay Jaime Fillol #24 6-3 3-6 6-1 Roscoe Tanner #12 Match data
Apr 26, 1975* Charlotte ATP 250 QF Clay Roscoe Tanner #14 4-6 6-4 6-3 Jaime Fillol #25 Match data
Apr 2, 1974* Tuscon ATP 250 R32 Hard Jaime Fillol #14 7-5 6-2 Roscoe Tanner #26 Match data
Feb 24, 1972* Salisbury ATP 250 R16 Hard Jaime Fillol 7-6 6-4 Roscoe Tanner Match data
Feb 17, 1972* Los Angeles ATP 250 R32 Carpet Roscoe Tanner 6-2 2-6 6-4 Jaime Fillol Match data
Jul 22, 1970* Cincinnati Masters 1000 R64 Clay Jaime Fillol 8-6 6-4 Roscoe Tanner Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Jaime Fillol #1,171 #14 8 2,041 532 367 59.2% 0 0 0 0 7 7
Roscoe Tanner #789 #4 0 2,158 595 298 66.6% 1 1 0 0 15 17

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jaime Fillol Roscoe Tanner
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 1969 0–2 0.0% — 1,479 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 1970 0–9 0.0% — 1,417 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 1971 16–10 61.5% — 1,703 0 0
20 — — — — — — — 1972 29–14 67.4% — 1,911 0 0
21 — — — — — — — 1973 45–30 60.0% #24 1,812 0 0
22 1968 30–10 75.0% — 1,658 0 1 1974 66–28 70.2% #14 1,959 0 2
23 1969 27–19 58.7% — 1,673 0 1 1975 65–24 73.0% #9 1,965 0 5
24 1970 32–23 58.2% — 1,749 0 1 1976 70–28 71.4% #11 2,012 0 9
25 1971 43–21 67.2% — 1,774 0 3 1977 52–30 63.4% #15 1,880 1 11
26 1972 44–32 57.9% — 1,745 0 3 1978 59–24 71.1% #11 1,935 1 13
27 1973 51–33 60.7% #17 1,867 0 4 1979 61–19 76.2% #5 2,025 1 15
28 1974 48–32 60.0% #31 1,830 0 4 1980 42–16 72.4% #13 1,993 1 16
29 1975 56–27 67.5% #16 1,962 0 4 1981 51–22 69.9% #12 1,901 1 17
30 1976 47–27 63.5% #24 1,928 0 5 1982 20–17 54.1% #43 1,779 1 17
31 1977 44–21 67.7% #24 1,894 0 5 1983 16–13 55.2% #36 1,872 1 17
32 1978 33–29 53.2% #77 1,756 0 5 1984 3–11 21.4% #249 1,679 1 17
33 1979 21–28 42.9% #124 1,736 0 5 1985 0–1 0.0% #794 1,661 1 17
34 1980 10–22 31.2% #86 1,644 0 5 — — — — — — —
35 1981 18–19 48.6% #95 1,654 0 6 — — — — — — —
36 1982 14–8 63.6% #77 1,707 0 7 — — — — — — —
37 1983 14–16 46.7% #85 1,649 0 7 — — — — — — —