H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Jaime Fillol vs Ross Case H2H: 6-2

Jaime Fillol holds a 6–2 lead over Ross Case in their ATP head-to-head. Across 8 main-draw meetings, Jaime Fillol leads 4–0 on clay, while they are tied 1–1 on carpet. Most recently, Jaime Fillol won the 1981 Mexico City quarterfinal 7-5 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jaime Fillol
CHI Age 80 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
6 – 2
8 main draw meetings
Ross Case
AUS Age 74 Right-Handed

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Feb 28, 1981* Mexico City ATP 250 QF Clay Jaime Fillol #86 7-5 6-4 Ross Case #163 Match data
Aug 6, 1976* Louisville ATP 250 R16 Clay Jaime Fillol #15 4-6 7-6 7-5 Ross Case #22 Match data
Jun 25, 1976* Wimbledon Grand Slam R64 Grass Jaime Fillol #15 8-9 6-4 6-8 9-8 6-2 Ross Case #19 Match data
Apr 25, 1975* Charlotte ATP 250 R16 Clay Jaime Fillol #25 6-3 5-7 6-1 Ross Case #43 Match data
Apr 10, 1974* New Orleans Wct ATP 250 R32 Carpet Ross Case #33 3-6 7-6 7-6 Jaime Fillol #14 Match data
Feb 7, 1974* St. Petersburg Wct ATP 250 R32 Hard Ross Case #42 6-4 5-7 6-4 Jaime Fillol #17 Match data
Aug 17, 1973* Tanglewood ATP 250 QF Clay Jaime Fillol 6-2 6-3 Ross Case Match data
Sep 22, 1972* Seattle ATP 250 QF Carpet Jaime Fillol 1-6 6-1 6-4 Ross Case Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Jaime Fillol #1,171 #14 8 2,041 532 367 59.2% 0 0 0 0 7 7
Ross Case #758 #14 0 1,960 294 276 51.6% 0 0 0 0 4 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jaime Fillol Ross Case
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1968 3–3 50.0% — 1,503 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1969 4–4 50.0% — 1,527 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 1970 11–8 57.9% — 1,580 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 1971 26–20 56.5% — 1,642 0 0
20 — — — — — — — 1972 22–21 51.2% — 1,687 0 0
21 — — — — — — — 1973 42–34 55.3% #42 1,809 0 1
22 1968 30–10 75.0% — 1,658 0 1 1974 43–28 60.6% #29 1,828 0 2
23 1969 27–19 58.7% — 1,673 0 1 1975 38–22 63.3% #27 1,933 0 4
24 1970 32–23 58.2% — 1,749 0 1 1976 28–24 53.8% #45 1,832 0 4
25 1971 43–21 67.2% — 1,774 0 3 1977 21–24 46.7% #55 1,758 0 4
26 1972 44–32 57.9% — 1,745 0 3 1978 14–19 42.4% #86 1,680 0 4
27 1973 51–33 60.7% #17 1,867 0 4 1979 24–26 48.0% #74 1,674 0 4
28 1974 48–32 60.0% #31 1,830 0 4 1980 11–20 35.5% #163 1,619 0 4
29 1975 56–27 67.5% #16 1,962 0 4 1981 5–15 25.0% #163 1,500 0 4
30 1976 47–27 63.5% #24 1,928 0 5 1982 1–5 16.7% #215 1,466 0 4
31 1977 44–21 67.7% #24 1,894 0 5 1983 1–3 25.0% #415 1,458 0 4
32 1978 33–29 53.2% #77 1,756 0 5 — — — — — — —
33 1979 21–28 42.9% #124 1,736 0 5 — — — — — — —
34 1980 10–22 31.2% #86 1,644 0 5 — — — — — — —
35 1981 18–19 48.6% #95 1,654 0 6 — — — — — — —
36 1982 14–8 63.6% #77 1,707 0 7 — — — — — — —
37 1983 14–16 46.7% #85 1,649 0 7 — — — — — — —