H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Jaime Fillol vs Roy Emerson H2H: 0-3
Roy Emerson holds a 3–0 lead over Jaime Fillol in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Roy Emerson leads 2–0 on carpet and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Roy Emerson won the 1973 Toronto Wct semifinal 6-2 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CHI
Age 80
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0
–
3
3 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 89
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 16, 1973* | Toronto Wct | ATP 250 | SF | Carpet | Roy Emerson | 6-2 6-2 | Jaime Fillol | Match data |
| Aug 14, 1970* | Boston | ATP 250 | QF | Hard | Roy Emerson | 6-3 6-2 | Jaime Fillol | Match data |
| Feb 5, 1970* | Philadelphia Wct | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Roy Emerson | 6-0 6-4 | Jaime Fillol | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jaime Fillol | #1,171 | #14 | 8 | 2,041 | 532 | 367 | 59.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 7 |
| Roy Emerson | #744 | #12 | 0 | 1,982 | 275 | 174 | 61.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jaime Fillol | Roy Emerson | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 22 | 1968 | 30–10 | 75.0% | — | 1,658 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1969 | 27–19 | 58.7% | — | 1,673 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1970 | 32–23 | 58.2% | — | 1,749 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1971 | 43–21 | 67.2% | — | 1,774 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1972 | 44–32 | 57.9% | — | 1,745 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1973 | 51–33 | 60.7% | #17 | 1,867 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1974 | 48–32 | 60.0% | #31 | 1,830 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1975 | 56–27 | 67.5% | #16 | 1,962 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1976 | 47–27 | 63.5% | #24 | 1,928 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1977 | 44–21 | 67.7% | #24 | 1,894 | 0 | 5 | 1968 | 44–26 | 62.9% | — | 1,790 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | 1978 | 33–29 | 53.2% | #77 | 1,756 | 0 | 5 | 1969 | 62–31 | 66.7% | — | 1,859 | 0 | 5 |
| 33 | 1979 | 21–28 | 42.9% | #124 | 1,736 | 0 | 5 | 1970 | 41–25 | 62.1% | — | 1,927 | 0 | 5 |
| 34 | 1980 | 10–22 | 31.2% | #86 | 1,644 | 0 | 5 | 1971 | 46–30 | 60.5% | — | 1,910 | 0 | 5 |
| 35 | 1981 | 18–19 | 48.6% | #95 | 1,654 | 0 | 6 | 1972 | 31–24 | 56.4% | — | 1,898 | 0 | 5 |
| 36 | 1982 | 14–8 | 63.6% | #77 | 1,707 | 0 | 7 | 1973 | 35–18 | 66.0% | #12 | 1,931 | 0 | 6 |
| 37 | 1983 | 14–16 | 46.7% | #85 | 1,649 | 0 | 7 | 1974 | 7–5 | 58.3% | #82 | 1,876 | 0 | 6 |
| 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1975 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #154 | 1,800 | 0 | 6 |
| 39 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1976 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #310 | 1,766 | 0 | 6 |
| 40 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 6–4 | 60.0% | #156 | 1,786 | 0 | 6 |
| 46 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,759 | 0 | 6 |