H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Jaime Fillol vs Thomaz Koch H2H: 4-1
Jaime Fillol holds a 4–1 lead over Thomaz Koch in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Jaime Fillol leads 2–0 on carpet, while they are tied 1–1 on clay. Most recently, Thomaz Koch won the 1979 Bogota fourth round 6-0 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CHI
Age 80
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
4
–
1
5 main draw meetings
BRA
Age 81
Left-Handed
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 16, 1979* | Bogota | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Thomaz Koch | 6-0 6-4 | Jaime Fillol | Match data |
| Nov 27, 1976* | Buenos Aires | ATP 250 | SF | Clay | Jaime Fillol | 6-2 6-1 | Thomaz Koch | Match data |
| Jan 22, 1975* | Philadelphia Wct | ATP 250 | R64 | Carpet | Jaime Fillol | (w/o) | Thomaz Koch | Match data |
| Feb 10, 1971* | Washington 1 | ATP 250 | F | Carpet | Jaime Fillol | 6-1 3-6 6-4 6-7 6-4 | Thomaz Koch | Match data |
| Apr 4, 1969* | San Juan | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Jaime Fillol | 6-4 3-6 6-3 | Thomaz Koch | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jaime Fillol | #1,171 | #14 | 8 | 2,041 | 532 | 367 | 59.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 7 |
| Thomaz Koch | #857 | #24 | 0 | 1,873 | 200 | 157 | 56.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jaime Fillol | Thomaz Koch | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 22 | 1968 | 30–10 | 75.0% | — | 1,658 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1969 | 27–19 | 58.7% | — | 1,673 | 0 | 1 | 1968 | 29–17 | 63.0% | — | 1,677 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1970 | 32–23 | 58.2% | — | 1,749 | 0 | 1 | 1969 | 34–18 | 65.4% | — | 1,799 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | 1971 | 43–21 | 67.2% | — | 1,774 | 0 | 3 | 1970 | 18–15 | 54.5% | — | 1,786 | 0 | 4 |
| 26 | 1972 | 44–32 | 57.9% | — | 1,745 | 0 | 3 | 1971 | 24–13 | 64.9% | — | 1,717 | 0 | 5 |
| 27 | 1973 | 51–33 | 60.7% | #17 | 1,867 | 0 | 4 | 1972 | 19–16 | 54.3% | — | 1,717 | 0 | 6 |
| 28 | 1974 | 48–32 | 60.0% | #31 | 1,830 | 0 | 4 | 1973 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #204 | 1,704 | 0 | 6 |
| 29 | 1975 | 56–27 | 67.5% | #16 | 1,962 | 0 | 4 | 1974 | 22–12 | 64.7% | #24 | 1,861 | 0 | 6 |
| 30 | 1976 | 47–27 | 63.5% | #24 | 1,928 | 0 | 5 | 1975 | 20–22 | 47.6% | #62 | 1,743 | 0 | 6 |
| 31 | 1977 | 44–21 | 67.7% | #24 | 1,894 | 0 | 5 | 1976 | 15–8 | 65.2% | #58 | 1,803 | 0 | 6 |
| 32 | 1978 | 33–29 | 53.2% | #77 | 1,756 | 0 | 5 | 1977 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #263 | 1,706 | 0 | 6 |
| 33 | 1979 | 21–28 | 42.9% | #124 | 1,736 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 1980 | 10–22 | 31.2% | #86 | 1,644 | 0 | 5 | 1979 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #85 | 1,658 | 0 | 6 |
| 35 | 1981 | 18–19 | 48.6% | #95 | 1,654 | 0 | 6 | 1980 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #49 | 1,651 | 0 | 6 |
| 36 | 1982 | 14–8 | 63.6% | #77 | 1,707 | 0 | 7 | 1981 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #90 | 1,627 | 0 | 6 |
| 37 | 1983 | 14–16 | 46.7% | #85 | 1,649 | 0 | 7 | 1982 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #240 | 1,592 | 0 | 6 |
| 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #185 | 1,583 | 0 | 6 |