H2H data updated: 2026-07-17 14:15 UTC

Jaime Fillol vs Tom Okker H2H: 2-6

Tom Okker holds a 6–2 lead over Jaime Fillol in their ATP head-to-head. Across 8 main-draw meetings, Tom Okker leads 3–1 on clay and 3–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Tom Okker won the 1978 Montreal / Toronto third round 4-6 7-6 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jaime Fillol
CHI Age 80 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
2 – 6
8 main draw meetings
Tom Okker
NED Age 82 Right-Handed 177 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 17, 1978* Montreal / Toronto Masters 1000 R32 Clay Tom Okker #46 4-6 7-6 6-3 Jaime Fillol #23 Match data
Oct 30, 1976* Paris Indoor ATP 250 QF Hard Jaime Fillol #15 6-4 6-3 Tom Okker #17 Match data
Nov 1, 1975* Paris Indoor ATP 250 QF Hard Tom Okker #9 6-1 6-4 Jaime Fillol #24 Match data
Nov 8, 1974* Stockholm ATP 250 R16 Hard Tom Okker #5 7-6 6-1 Jaime Fillol #23 Match data
Oct 18, 1974* Barcelona ATP 250 R16 Clay Jaime Fillol #23 6-1 6-3 Tom Okker #5 Match data
Dec 2, 1973* Johannesburg ATP 250 QF Hard Tom Okker #4 7-5 6-2 6-7 6-3 Jaime Fillol #18 Match data
Oct 27, 1973* Madrid ATP 250 F Clay Tom Okker #6 4-6 6-3 6-3 7-5 Jaime Fillol #23 Match data
Jul 28, 1973* Washington ATP 250 SF Clay Tom Okker 6-1 6-4 Jaime Fillol Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Jaime Fillol #1,171 #14 8 2,041 532 367 59.2% 0 0 0 0 7 7
Tom Okker #438 #3 0 2,198 672 279 70.7% 0 2 0 0 35 37

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jaime Fillol Tom Okker
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
22 1968 30–10 75.0% — 1,658 0 1 — — — — — — —
23 1969 27–19 58.7% — 1,673 0 1 — — — — — — —
24 1970 32–23 58.2% — 1,749 0 1 1968 89–23 79.5% — 1,796 0 7
25 1971 43–21 67.2% — 1,774 0 3 1969 86–25 77.5% — 2,009 0 15
26 1972 44–32 57.9% — 1,745 0 3 1970 59–27 68.6% — 1,948 0 20
27 1973 51–33 60.7% #17 1,867 0 4 1971 74–31 70.5% — 2,007 0 22
28 1974 48–32 60.0% #31 1,830 0 4 1972 69–31 69.0% — 2,041 0 23
29 1975 56–27 67.5% #16 1,962 0 4 1973 91–23 79.8% #4 2,166 0 30
30 1976 47–27 63.5% #24 1,928 0 5 1974 65–19 77.4% #6 2,061 0 33
31 1977 44–21 67.7% #24 1,894 0 5 1975 39–13 75.0% #11 2,068 0 35
32 1978 33–29 53.2% #77 1,756 0 5 1976 33–18 64.7% #23 1,956 0 35
33 1979 21–28 42.9% #124 1,736 0 5 1977 15–13 53.6% #31 1,931 0 36
34 1980 10–22 31.2% #86 1,644 0 5 1978 20–20 50.0% #50 1,879 0 36
35 1981 18–19 48.6% #95 1,654 0 6 1979 20–18 52.6% #56 1,772 0 37
36 1982 14–8 63.6% #77 1,707 0 7 1980 11–13 45.8% #107 1,715 0 37
37 1983 14–16 46.7% #85 1,649 0 7 1981 1–5 16.7% #107 1,651 0 37