H2H data updated: 2026-07-21 02:15 UTC
Jaime Oncins vs Bjorn Borg H2H: 1-0
Jaime Oncins holds a 1–0 lead over Bjorn Borg in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jaime Oncins leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jaime Oncins won the 1993 San Francisco third round 6-4 6-7(7) 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BRA
Age 56
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
SWE
Age 70
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 4, 1993* | San Francisco | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Jaime Oncins | 6-4 6-7(7) 6-4 | Bjorn Borg | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jaime Oncins | #1,034 | #34 | 773 | 1,796 | 61 | 86 | 41.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Bjorn Borg | #1,224 | #1 | 10 | 2,497 | 608 | 143 | 81.0% | 11 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 45 | 61 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jaime Oncins | Bjorn Borg | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1971 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1972 | 11–10 | 52.4% | — | 1,613 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1973 | 48–25 | 65.8% | #18 | 1,861 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1988 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #314 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 | 1974 | 90–24 | 78.9% | #3 | 2,057 | 1 | 8 |
| 19 | 1989 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #263 | 1,471 | 0 | 0 | 1975 | 77–19 | 80.2% | #3 | 2,178 | 2 | 13 |
| 20 | 1990 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #113 | 1,443 | 0 | 0 | 1976 | 54–12 | 81.8% | #2 | 2,292 | 3 | 19 |
| 21 | 1991 | 22–17 | 56.4% | #64 | 1,677 | 0 | 0 | 1977 | 76–8 | 90.5% | #3 | 2,336 | 4 | 30 |
| 22 | 1992 | 24–18 | 57.1% | #48 | 1,765 | 0 | 2 | 1978 | 68–9 | 88.3% | #2 | 2,331 | 6 | 38 |
| 23 | 1993 | 11–23 | 32.4% | #133 | 1,578 | 0 | 2 | 1979 | 80–7 | 92.0% | #1 | 2,427 | 8 | 50 |
| 24 | 1994 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #230 | 1,502 | 0 | 2 | 1980 | 66–7 | 90.4% | #1 | 2,376 | 10 | 58 |
| 25 | 1995 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #222 | 1,505 | 0 | 2 | 1981 | 35–6 | 85.4% | #4 | 2,334 | 11 | 61 |
| 26 | 1996 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #160 | 1,488 | 0 | 2 | 1982 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #90 | 2,308 | 11 | 61 |
| 27 | 1997 | 0–6 | 0.0% | #166 | 1,436 | 0 | 2 | 1983 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #262 | 2,282 | 11 | 61 |
| 28 | 1998 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #223 | 1,448 | 0 | 2 | 1984 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #745 | 2,251 | 11 | 61 |
| 31 | 2001 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1031 | 1,435 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1131 | 2,221 | 11 | 61 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 0–8 | 0.0% | #769 | 1,985 | 11 | 61 |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #1120 | 1,908 | 11 | 61 |